Showing posts with label Satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Satire. Show all posts

Friday, August 7, 2026

TV Quote of the Day (‘Soap,’ on Reluctance to Yield to the Will of the People)

[Burt has just received the election recount results.]

Burt [played by Richard Mulligan]: “Prentiss got caught stuffing the ballot boxes, so I won, I am the sheriff.”

[Everyone congratulates Burt.]

Danny [played by Ted Wass]: “How 'bout that? Sheriff. And I get to be deputy, right, Burt? Me, deputy, me. Please?”

Bob [played by Jay Johnson]: “I'm gonna be the deputy.”

Danny: “You are not!”

Bob: “Am too!”

[Danny and Bob argue before Mary breaks it up.]

Mary [played by Cathryn Damon]: “Burt, what's the matter?”

Burt: “Well, it's Prentiss, he won't give up the office. Yeah, he's holed up in the armory with enough weapons to quality as a Third World nation. He says he will not be taken alive and my first assignment is to take him.”

Danny: “Let's go get him.” 

Burt: “Danny, this Prentiss, he won gold medals for marksmanship and he is now in a fortified stone building.”

Bob: “On second thought, I don't want to be deputy.”—Soap, Season 3, Episode 20, original air date Mar. 13, 1980, teleplay by Susan Harris and Stu Silver, directed by J.D. Lobue

I must confess that when I heard that bit here about someone who “won’t give up the office,” I had a flashback to January 6, 2021—and especially one person involved that day. I bet some of you felt the same way.

Believe it or not, it looks like, since no legal or electoral price was paid for that refusal to accept the results of an election, other politicians want to get in on the act. A New York Times headline from the other day, about the major and several council members in rural Avenal, CA, who lost a recall election, says it all: “They Were Voted Out. They Refuse to Leave. Now What?”

Now what? Better pray that anyone else who gets this idea doesn’t get their hands on weapons, as Prentiss did in this Soap episode.


This scenario seemed the height of nuttiness 47 years ago. Now…

Friday, July 3, 2026

Song Lyric of the Day (Francis Hopkinson, Sending Up Redcoat Readiness in the Revolution)

“A soldier stood on a log of wood,
               And saw a thing surprising.
 
              As in amaze he stood to gaze,
               The truth can't be denied, sir,
              He spied a score of kegs or more
               Come floating down the tide, sir.
 
              A sailor too in jerkin blue,
               This strange appearance viewing,
              First damned his eyes, in great surprise,
               Then said, ‘Some mischief's brewing.
 
              "These kegs, I'm told, the rebels hold,
               Packed up like pickled herring;
              And they're come down to attack the town,
               In this new way of ferrying.’ 
 
              The soldier flew, the sailor too,
               And scared almost to death, sir,
              Wore out their shoes, to spread the news,
               And ran till out of breath, sir.”— American polymath and signer of the Declaration of Independence Francis Hopkinson (1737-1791), “The Battle of the Kegs,” originally published in 1778, reprinted in American Poetry: The Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, edited by David S. Shields (2007)
 
Faithful reader, if you’ve been reading this blog long enough and frequently enough, you’ll notice that I open and close the workweek with a humorous quote, on the reasonable supposition that everybody needs a laugh as they start their jobs on Monday and once they make it to Friday. I find no reason to change that pattern as we begin celebrating the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.
 
If you read anything at all about that document and the American Revolution in general (which I hope you will), nearly all of it will be very sober. And I’ll provide a bit of that over the weekend myself.
 
But human nature doesn’t change that much over the centuries, and the men and women who created this country liked to drink and laugh as much as we do. I think they would have nodded in agreement with a bibulous fellow writer on my college newspaper, when hearing a recent article described as “very sober,” remarked, “Gee, I hate anything sober!”
 
So did Francis Hopkinson, a signer of the Declaration of Independence whom I think you and I would have liked to hang with. A blog post of mine from 18 years ago described the general arc of the career of this witty Renaissance Man of the Revolution, but his part in depicting one incident in the war deserves a fuller explanation.
 
If the rhythm of his verses above sounds familiar, it should: they’re written to the tune of “Yankee Doodle.” Modern Americans associate that tune with patriots playing it on fife and drum on the way into battle, but it began a few decades before the war, with British doctor Richard Schuckburg creating a straw man with a colonist who was both a provincial hick and a pretentious fop.
 
By the outbreak of hostilities at Lexington and Concord, according to this account of the song on the Website of The Kennedy Center, the colonists were throwing the insult back, singing the tune derisively at the fleeing redcoats.
 
Nearly three years later, Hopkinson decided to make further use of the tune’s melody. You can see from the verses I’ve quoted that the lyrics are in ballad form, as capable of being sung as read.
 
What he was doing was rather audacious: taking a failed patriot military operation and, instead of being defensive about it, using it to mock vaunted British heroics.
 
In my high school, if you mentioned “The Battle of the Kegs,” some rowdy classmates might have seen it as a dare to finish off libations at a party. 

But in the American Revolution, it referred to a real patriot tactic in January 1778: to float explosive barrels at British ships. The colonists needed to try something: the British had captured and made themselves comfortable in Philadelphia, the capital of the young republic.
 
The whole thing was a big dud: no British ships blew up. But Hopkinson used the opportunity to satirize the redcoats’ panic and overreaction to the unknown objects coming their way.
 
Ultimately, the American Revolution would have to be settled by other means. But then as now, satire directed at an enemy possessing overwhelming power was necessary to sustain the spirit for the larger contest.

Friday, May 15, 2026

TV Quote of the Day (‘SNL,’ Imagining ‘Tucker Carlson’ on Maine)

“Tucker Carlson” [played by Jeremy Culhane] [after criticizing stars at the recent Met costume gala]: “What are we doing? What’s going on? Is this the New York we want to live in, Colin?”

Colin Jost: “Don't you live in, like, Maine?”

Carlson”: “Yes. And let's talk about Maine. M-a-i-n...e? Huh! Really? The ‘e’ is silent. But who silenced it and why?”

Jost: “What the hell are you talking about? You're talking about the silent ‘e’ in Maine now?”

Carlson”: “I'm glad you brought it up, Colin.”

Jost: “I didn't.”

Carlson”: “And what does that ‘e’ stand for? Oh, I know. ‘Euphoria.’” [A poster for the HBO series “Euphoria” flashes on the screen.]

Jost: “No!”

Carlson”: “Oh, yes. ‘Euphoria.’ And no, I'm not talking about the feeling I get when I press ‘1’ for ‘English.’” [High-pitched, self-satisfied cackling.]—“Weekly Update” segment, Saturday Night Live, Season 51, Episode 18, original air date May 2, 2026

Tucker Carlson has been lampooned before on SNL, but it was almost inevitable that the show would return to him recently, especially considering his podcast apology for past support of Donald Trump.

But his interview with Lulu Garcia-Navarro of The New York Times following his much-publicized break with Trump over the Iranian invasion deserved scorn that the show's writers ignored.  It’s astonishing: he can sound sincere, even logical, and before you know it Carlson’s spewing the most bigoted, conspiratorial nonsense.

All this shoots from his mouth with such glib rapidity that he can’t keep track of what he says. So he denied to Garcia-Navarro, for instance, about ever wondering if Trump might be the anti-Christ, even though he said it only a few weeks ago on a readily available recording.

I love how in his devastating impression, Jeremy Culhane captured how what Carlson wants to be a chuckle turns into a cackle. Only I wish he had included one of this demagogue’s most weaselly statements whenever he discusses matters like COVID vaccines: “I’m just asking questions.”

Monday, May 11, 2026

TV Quote of the Day (‘Parks and Recreation,’ on a Pivotal Moment in a Beauty Pageant)

[Serving as a judge in the Miss Pawnee Beauty Pageant, Leslie hopes to weed out one contestant whose lack of cranial matter is cheerfully overlooked by the male-dominated panel.]

Leslie Knope [played by Amy Poehler]: “Trish, Alexis de Tocqueville called America ‘The Great Experiment.’ What can we do, as citizens, to improve on that experiment?”

Trish Ianetta [played by April Eden]: “Uh, well, uh, I think America is the land of the free, which is a wonderful thing, and also the brave, where people can live. And nobody can ever take that away from you, and it never gives up. But the high birthing rate of immigrants frightens me! No offense to anyone out there, but if it were up to me and my family, I would actually call it our America, and not their America! Thank you.”

[The audience applauds enthusiastically.]

Leslie: “Don't applaud that. She didn't—she didn't answer my question.”— Parks and Recreation, Season 2, Episode 3, “Beauty Pageant,” original air date Oct. 1, 2009, teleplay by Katie Dippold and Harris Wittels, directed by Jason Woliner

This is a scene in which the full vacuity of a character can only be conveyed by watching an actor rather than by reading the admittedly clever dialogue.

In a few years, it sounds like Trish and her family would be among the original, hard-core MAGA contingent.

Monday, May 4, 2026

Flashback, May 1926: Miffed Sinclair Lewis Nixes Pulitzer for ‘Arrowsmith’

After bypassing Sinclair Lewis twice in the past half-dozen years, the Pulitzer Prize board –whether in recognition of present merit or compensation for past mistakes—awarded him the fiction prize for Arrowsmith in early May 1926.

Whether out of genuine principle or annoyance over his Main Street being passed over in 1920 for Edith Wharton’s The Age of Innocence or, in 1922, his Babbitt for Willa Cather’s One of Ours, Lewis rejected the citation. It may have been the most resounding rebuke of a cultural institution before George C. Scott and Marlon Brando refused to accept their Best Actor Oscars in the early 1970s.

Privately, Lewis told publisher Alfred Harcourt that he intended to turn it down because of “the Main Street burglary.” While some observers suspected peevishness on his part, Lewis gave a more high-minded public justification.

The terms of the Pulitzer called for the award to go to work that represented “the wholesome atmosphere of American life, and the highest standard of American manners and manhood”—precisely the grounds on which Main Street and Babbitt, with their withering satire, had been bypassed before.

Those terms, Lewis wrote in his letter of rejection, “would appear to mean that the appraisal of the novels shall be made not according to their actual literary merit but in obedience to whatever code of Good Form may chance to be popular at the moment.”

With three bestselling, highly acclaimed novels to his credit, Lewis wielded a great deal of credibility, particularly when he framed his rejection in the context of his also declining election to the National Institute of Arts and Letters. His refusal of the Pulitzer and the $1,000 that went with it earned front-page notice in The New York Times.

As there always are in such cases, cynics wondered if there was more to the situation than Lewis explained, and their case was bolstered four years later, when he accepted the Nobel Prize for Literature—particularly because, in turning down the Pulitzer, he had stated that “All prizes, like all titles, are dangerous.” [emphasis added]

Arrowsmith may have been the most universally appealing of Lewis’ novels to this point, featuring a protagonist who, though flawed, was an idealistic, science-oriented doctor dedicated wholly to the pursuit of knowledge and truth.

While not dispensing with the author’s gift for satire (in this case, targeting medical quackery, public-health bureaucrats, and doctors who shamelessly pursuit financial success at the expense of patients), it gave readers a chance to admire a major character unreservedly.

As the son and brother of doctors, Lewis came by his interest in the medical profession naturally. But what many critics and ordinary readers may not have realized at the time is that the career of Martin Arrowsmith drew on Lewis’ recent friendship with 35-year-old microbiologist and pathologist Paul De Kruif—one that became so close that it evolved into a genuine working collaboration.

As James Tobin explains in this blog post, Lewis even suggested to De Kruif that he be listed as co-author, with the two splitting royalties 50-50. The doctor, as much stunned by the generous offer as aware that Lewis’ name constituted the proposed project’s main selling point, thought that the split should be 75% to 25% in Lewis’ favor.

In the end, either Lewis’s publisher or the author himself rejected the microbiologist’s request for a single line on the title page: “In collaboration with Paul De Kruif.”

Instead, Lewis set out his debt to De Kruif in a different fashion, acknowledging his help “not only for most of the bacteriological and medical material in this tale but equally for his suggestions in the planning of the fable itself  – for his realization of the characters as living people, for his philosophy as a scientist.”

In the end, it wasn’t insufficient acknowledgement of his creative input that fractured De Kruif’s relationship with Lewis, but at least several incidents of the latter’s erratic, often alcohol-fueled misbehavior that at last couldn’t be ignored.

Nevertheless, his association with the now-prizing author benefited De Kruif enough that he came to write a bestselling nonfiction account of medicine later that year, Microbe Hunters, launching a second career for him as a popular writer of medical histories, biographies, and public-health advocacy.

After winning the Nobel Prize, as his alcoholism worsened, most critics agreed that the quality of Lewis’ work suffered, and his reputation took a further hit with Mark Schorer’s 1961 biography. But periodically, readers who have returned to the novels written at his peak discover their continuing relevance, and Arrowsmith is no exception.

As I mentioned in this post from late last year, though not read as widely as two other novels published in 1925, F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Theodore Dreiser’s An American Tragedy, it shared with them a searing criticism of American materialism at the height of the Roaring Twenties.

More than a few 21st-century patients will nod appreciatively at how, in med school, Arrowsmith listens to a professor who extols the value of salesmanship to his students—including the value of convincing patients of the need for dubious small but money-making operations.

They will also detect the early baleful influence of Big Pharma in the Hunziker Company’s harassment of Arrowsmith’s mentor, the German scientist Max Gottlieb, for his reluctance to market an antitoxin he’s developed until he’s absolutely certain of its effectiveness—and, since COVID-19, they will shudder on the enormous pressures and responsibilities felt by Arrowsmith as he battles the outbreak of bubonic plague on an island in the West Indies.

Friday, May 1, 2026

Movie Quote of the Day (‘How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying,’ With a Typical Executive Disclaimer of Responsibility)

J. B. Biggley [played by Rudy Vallee, on the left with Robert Morse]: “I realize that I'm the president of this company, the man that's responsible for everything that goes on here. So, I want to state, right now, that anything that happened is not my fault.”— How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying (1967), based on the novel by Shepherd Mead, adapted into a Pulitzer and Tony-winning musical with book by Abe Burrows, Jack Weinstock and Willie Gilbert, music and lyrics by Frank Loesser, movie written and directed by David Swift

For years, I’ve heard many politicians—I won’t say from which party—express their belief that government should be “run more like a business.” I wonder if the business they have in mind is J.B. Biggley’s World Wide Wicket Company?

Well, I’ll tell you: that statement of his that I’ve highlighted here is, for all intents and purposes, the continued default option for corporate executives who run into trouble, whether in the form of product or service failure, a disastrous earnings report, even fraud or misconduct. Their most common method for avoiding responsibility is to blame a predecessor.

Now that I think of it, a politician I can think of immediately has also taken this very course.

Monday, March 23, 2026

Song Lyric of the Day (Gilbert and Sullivan, on ‘Little Errands for the Ministers of State’)

“Oh, philosophers may sing
Of the troubles of a King;
Yet the duties are delightful, and the privileges great;
But the privilege and pleasure
That we treasure beyond measure
Is to run on little errands for the Ministers of State.”— “Rising Early in the Morning," from The Gondoliers: or, The King of Barataria (1889), libretto by W.S. Gilbert (1836-1911), music by Arthur Sullivan (1842-1900)

The image accompanying this post shows Rutland Barrington and Courtice Pounds as Giuseppe and Marco, the title characters in the 1889 production of The Gondoliers

Times have changed greatly since then, but it seems like all over the world, there’s still no shortage of people ready to run “little errands for the Ministers of State.” Only they're called bureaucrats rather than gondoliers.

Friday, February 20, 2026

TV Quote of the Day (‘Yes, Prime Minister,’ on What Worries the U.K. Government)

James Hacker [played by Paul Eddington]: “Humphrey, I'm worried.”

Sir Humphrey Appleby [played by Nigel Hawthorne]: “Oh, what about, Prime Minister?”

Hacker: “About the Americans.”

Appleby: “Oh yes, well, we're all worried about the Americans.” — Yes, Prime Minister, Season 1, Episode 6, “A Victory for Democracy,” original air date Feb. 13, 1986, teleplay by Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, directed by Sydney Lotterby

Forty years after this episode in this hilarious series aired, the British have even more to worry about their partner in the “special relationship” than they did back when it only concerned Americans going crazy about Communist subversion.

Now, the Prime Minister has so much more on his mind—like whether the current American President will destroy the transatlantic alliance, subvert representative governments around the globe, spark a trade war by ratcheting up tariffs, or use Royal Air Force bases for potential unilateral strikes on Iran.

Moreover, the Prime Minister and King Charles are sweating over what else the Americans have in the Epstein files—like whether they could make matters even worse, if possible, for the former Prince Andrew, and, with more revelations spilling out about additional cabinet ministers, whether the government of Keir Starmer could fall.

Monday, February 2, 2026

TV Quote of the Day (‘Yes, Minister,’ on a Government Aide’s Job Function)

[A British Cabinet member is annoyed at an aide’s long-winded rambling.]

James Hacker, Minister [played by Paul Eddington, left]: “You're blathering, Bernard.”

Bernard Woolley, Principal Private Secretary [played by Derek Fowlds, right]: “Yes, Minister.”

Hacker: “Why are you blathering, Bernard?”

Bernard: “It's my job, Minister.”—Yes, Minister, Season 1, Episode 7, “Jobs for the Boys,” original air date Apr. 7, 1980, teleplay by Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, directed by Sydney Lotterby

Monday, December 8, 2025

Verse of the Day (A.M. Juster, on an Ambitious Government Bureaucrat)

“Your uphill climb will never stop;
   scum always rises to the top.” —Poet, translator, and essayist A.M. Juster (pseudonym for Michael J. Astrue, former head of the Social Security Administration), “To My Ambitious Colleague,” in Sleaze and Slander: New and Selected Comic Verse, 1995-2015 (2016)

Tuesday, December 2, 2025

TV Quote of the Day (‘Veep,’ on Executive Branch Overspending)

Selina Meyer [played by Julia Louis-Dreyfus] [berating aide Gary for overspending on a state dinner on her behalf]: “Who do you think you are? Gary Antoinette?!” —Veep, Season 4, Episode 2, “East Wing,” original air date Apr. 19, 2015, teleplay by Kevin Cecil, Roger Drew, and Andy Riley, directed by Stephanie Laing

Friday, November 7, 2025

TV Quote of the Day (‘Yes, Minister,’ on Balancing Public and Private Interests)

[To save a financially troubled soccer club, James Hacker floats the idea of selling an unpopular local art gallery, the Corn Exchange Art Gallery, to private interests.]

Sir Humphrey Appleby [played by Nigel Hawthorne, facing camera]: “Now minister, I do hope that you've considered the implications of your new appointment on the subject you're discussing?”

James Hacker [played by Paul Eddington, shown from behind]: “Rescuing a football club?”

Sir Humphrey: “No, I was wondering how it would look if, as cabinet minister responsible for the arts, your first action would be to knock down an art gallery?” —Yes, Minister, Season 3, Episode 7, “The Middle-Class Rip-Off,” original air date Dec. 23, 1982, teleplay by Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, directed by Peter Whitmore

More than 40 years ago, British TV audiences would have howled at the massive irony of the “first action” in the above quote. “Impossible!” they would have scoffed.

Today, across the ocean, more than a few Americans are wincing at a President who, without so much as a by-your-leave, has knocked down an entire wing of the White House. That even puts in the pale the same President’s appointment of himself to chair the board of the Kennedy Center.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Quote of the Day (Steve Hely, Imagining Ghostwriting College Essays for Rich American Teens)

“They'd send you something about how Anchorman or the golf team had changed their lives. I'd polish it up, change Will Ferrell to Toni Morrison, and golf to learning woodworking from a Darfur refugee.”—American novelist, TV writer-producer, and podcaster Steve Hely, How I Became a Famous Novelist (2009)

Friday, October 17, 2025

Movie Quote of the Day (‘Prizzi’s Honor,’ on a Hit Man’s Head-Scratcher)

[Charley is telling former girlfriend Maerose about new love Irene Walker.]

Charley Partanna [played by Jack Nicholson]: “I met her in a church. It just happened. I knew she was the woman for me. She'd organized the scam in Vegas. I go looking for the bad guy and it turns out to be my woman, can you imagine this? Not only that—Pop tells me she's the piece man for the Nettabino contract. Just the same, I love her, Mae... I love her.”

Maerose Prizzi [played by Anjelica Huston]: “Well...”

Charley: “How can I live with this? I gotta do something about it. I gotta straighten it out.”

Maerose: “Then do.”

Charley: “Do what? Do I ice her? Do I marry her? Which one of these?”— Prizzi’s Honor (1985), screenplay by Richard Condon and Janet Roach, adapted from the novel by Richard Condon, directed by John Huston

Tuesday, September 2, 2025

Quote of the Day (Tim O'Brien, on the ‘Mythomania’ Epidemic of the Last Decade)

“Mythomania—or plain old lying—infiltrated churches, schools, hair salons, corporate boardrooms, courtrooms, and nightclubs. Smith & Wesson received seven hundred write-in votes in Topeka’s mayoral race. The Library of Congress was under pressure to ban its copy of the Gutenberg Bible for flaunting the word fornicate and the first two syllables of the word sodomy. Speechwriters jumped aboard. Nannies and city councilmen in Prescott, Arizona, denounced the devil’s codex implanted in the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution; NASA was burning down forests in Idaho; the Census Bureau was refusing to count people with blue eyes; Grover Cleveland’s skull was buried under the Watergate complex; vigilantes roamed the nighttime streets of Fargo in search of Democrats and Kenyans; Columbine was a CIA operation; Pearl Harbor never happened; corporations were people; Amazon was a distinguished citizen. In Fulda, where the Truth Tellers were led by Dink O’Neill, his brother Chub, and Chamber of Commerce President Earl Fenstermacher, the burdens of seeding fake unfake news kept them hopping through the hot days of September 2019.”— American novelist Tim O'Brien, America Fantastica (2023)

Friday, August 29, 2025

Quote of the Day (Larry David, Imagining Himself Hiding Immigrants)

February 12, 2025. Today I heard something about an Alien Enemies Act. I don't know what that is, but it's over two hundred years old and sounds really scary. All of it put Mr. Larry in a terrible mood, which was made even worse when he couldn’t find the remote control to the TV. He came up to the attic and asked if anyone knew where it could be. He was very angry. ‘What is it with these remotes? Why are we always looking for them? I'm so sick of this!’ Mr. Larry said he liked it better when the only way to change the channel was to walk up to the TV and turn the dial and that those were the days. Papa told him to look between the couch cushions. Mr. Larry said he did. Papa said to dig deeper—it's always there. Of course, he was right. Not only did he find the remote. He also found an old phone called a BlackBerry, from 2002.”— American comedian, writer, actor, and television producer Larry David, “Shouts and Murmurs: The Diary of Anna Franco,” The New Yorker, July 21, 2025

“Anna Franco.” Oh, boy. An outrageous premise that could only come from the man who imagined a Seinfeld episode involving a date during the showing of Schindler’s List.

(This image of the creator of Seinfeld and Curb Your Enthusiasm was taken at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival by David Shankbone.)

Monday, July 28, 2025

TV Quote of the Day (‘Scandal,’ As Olivia Shows Why She’s an Ace Crisis Manager)

Olivia Pope [played by Kerry Washington]: “The mayor's wife is upstairs lying in a pool of blood while my team erases evidence of a crime scene. I'd say it takes a lot to surprise me.”—Scandal, Season 4, Episode 19, “I’m Just a Bill,” original air date Apr. 16, 2015, teleplay by Shonda Rhimes, Raamla Mohamed, and Paul William Davies, directed by Debbie Allen

After watching only a few episodes of Scandal a decade ago, I gave up. Its plots were getting so crazy, I figured, that they were no longer remotely close to reality.

Today, reality has overtaken anything that series showrunner Shonda Rimes could ever dream up. Even Hollis Doyle, a billionaire with Presidential ambitions invented late in the show’s run, can’t begin to suggest how his real-life original is acting these days.

Maybe around the turn of the century, no politician with national ambitions could hope to go far without an Olivia Pope to snuff out scandals. In the new Washington, who needs the likes of her? The new mantra: Be as brazen as you wanna be!

Friday, July 25, 2025

TV Quote of the Day (‘Yes, Minister,’ With the Transatlantic ‘Golden Rule’ of Scandal Containment)

Bernard Woolley, the Minister’s principal private secretary [played by Derek Fowlds, left]:So what do we believe in?”

Sir Humphrey Appleby, the Permanent Secretary for the Ministry of Administrative Affairs [played by Nigel Hawthorne, right]:At this moment, Bernard, we believe in stopping the minister from informing the Prime Minister.”

Bernard: “But why?”

Sir Humphrey: “Because once the Prime Minister knows, there will have to be an enquiry, like Watergate. The investigation of a trivial break-in led to one ghastly revelation after another and finally the downfall of a president. The golden rule is don't lift lids off cans of worms. Everything is connected to everything else. Who said that?”

Bernard: “The Cabinet Secretary?”

Sir Humphrey: “Nearly right. Actually, it was Lenin.” —Yes, Minister, Season 3, Episode 6, “The Whisky Priest,” original air date Dec. 16, 1982, teleplay by Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, directed by Peter Whitmore

These days, the Trump Administration is well past the “golden rule” propounded by Sir Humphrey, let alone Jesus Christ. As he looks around the fast-developing wreckage of the Epstein scandal, the President must wonder, “How did I ever get into this mess?”

So now, the Orange Menace is resorting to what may be thought of as his 3D Defense. You know: Deny, Distract, Delay, then repeat, till events break your way.

It’s worked before. Let’s see if the old Trump Voodoo gets him out of this latest doo-doo. With Congress closing sooner this week (courtesy of House Speaker Mike Johnson), anything can happen.

Monday, July 7, 2025

Quote of the Day (Evelyn Waugh, With a British Definition of ‘News’)

“News is what a chap who doesn't care much about anything wants to read. And it's only news until he's read it. After that it's dead.” —English novelist Evelyn Waugh (1903-1966), Scoop (1938)

Well, I guess in the United States, the closest equivalent is any media outlet owned by the Murdoch family.

Friday, May 16, 2025

Flashback, May 1975: ‘Seven Beauties’ Scores With Pitch-Black Satire on the Death Camps

With the world premiere of Seven Beauties in France in May 1975, Lina Wertmüller not only maintained the buzz surrounding her since Love and Anarchy three years before, but reached what turned out to be her career zenith.  

No other filmmaker had created such a brand of biting, individually rendered satire since Preston Sturges’ run of Hollywood comedies in the early 1940s.

Then, like Sturges, Wertmüller made the mistake of releasing a movie that didn’t make money—and found her critical cachet as depleted as her box office grosses.

Even notoriously acerbic movie critic John Simon hailed her in a New York Magazine cover story as “The Most Important Film Director Since Ingmar Bergman." 

Such was the acclaim and attention that she became the first female to be nominated for a Best Director Oscar with this film, briefly reminding Hollywood that women had been at the forefront of industry back in the silent era.

Her iconoclastic views on class, sex, and politics in The Seduction of Mimi, Love and Anarchy, and Swept Away—all featuring Giancarlo Giannini as an antihero—set the stage for this latest triumph, at a time when loosened censorship made these topics a matter of incessant debate among cinephiles.

What made her work so compelling—and, at the same time, flummoxed many viewers—was Wertmuller’s refusal to fit neatly into an ideological box. Professedly a socialist, she gravitated more toward anarchism. (Pedro, a philosophical concentration camp inmate, echoes the director’s belief that “A new man in disorder is our only hope.”) Though a trailblazing female director, she evinced little interest in feminism.

The filmmaker’s creative methods were as unconventional as her subjects. The supercharged, slapstick energy of the films of her prime derives from her early training in the Italian commedia dell'arte form, characterized by extensive improvisation.

Most of the film’s scorn is directed at Giannini’s Pasqualino Frafuso, a small-time Neapolitan hood sarcastically nicknamed “Seven Beauties” for the group of homely sisters whose honor he continually boasts of protecting.

Flashbacks detail how his foolish machismo lead him to kill one sister’s pimp, fall into the hands of the police (right after boasting loudly that he’d never be taken alive), fake insanity to avoid jail, volunteer for service in Mussolini’s army when he fears he will go crazy with other lunatics, desert from the Eastern Front, and find himself in a German concentration camp. He is now face to face with the question: how far will he go to survive?

That turns out to be desperately far: first, when he decides to seduce the grotesque, pitiless female camp commandment, then when given charge of fellow inmates—including with responsibility for selecting who will live and who will die.

The lesson that Wertmuller drives home—that the horrors of Fascism become possible not just by political criminals who seize control of the state, but by the supine complicity of ordinary citizens—comes early in the film, when Pasqualino and fellow army escapee Francesco stumble upon Nazi soldiers perpetrating a massacre against helpless prisoners in an open field.

Carefully hiding while watching helplessly from a distance, Pasqualino and Francesco debate what they could have done. Francesco says that they are accomplices in the atrocity: “We didn't make a sound, didn't come out and spit in their faces.”

Nothing doing, Pasqualino counters: that would just be a “useless suicide.”

But Francesco persists: “No, it wouldn't have been useless because in the face of certain things you've got to say no, and instead I said yes to Mussolini, to duty, and to all that crap.”

As demonstrated in Maureen Orth’s October 1975 profile in Newsweek, Wertmuller indulged her penchant for non-professional actors by including the American journalist (originally on a brief leave of absence as her assistant) and her mother among the extras as a prostitute and her madam.

Like mentor Federico Fellini (for whom she worked on ), she sought unusual, sometimes grotesque, faces. Moreover, she often preferred visual to verbal instructions forgoing a translation of her remarks to the American actress Shirley Stoler, saying, “I don’t care if she understands what I say, I just want her to imitate what I do.”

Despite its considerable critical acclaim, Seven Beauties has not lacked detractors, then or now. Like Wertmuller’s prior films, it featured graphic violence (including rape, which has troubled many feminists who would otherwise champion her work).

Although its depiction of the Nazi death camps is grim, its tone veers as often into the satiric as the sorrowful. In the opening minutes, grainy black-and-white images of World War II contrast with a sardonic male voice-over intoning, “Oh, yeah” two dozen times (“The ones who vote for the right because they're fed up with strikes. Oh yeah. The ones who vote white in order not to get dirty. The ones who never get involved with politics. Oh yeah.”)

The repetition feels much like the “so it goes” mantra that Kurt Vonnegut used to comment on the senseless carnage of that conflict in Slaughterhouse Five.  The sequence is a necessary prelude to understand how Pasqualino will exhibit the amoral survival instincts of a cockroach.

Furthermore, though the Nazi victims onscreen include political dissidents and deserters, none are specifically identified as Jewish, even though that group was the major target of Nazi extermination schemes. That fact is all the more surprising given that Wertmuller based her screenplay on an Italian-Jewish death-camp survivor who, like Pasqualino, killed his sister’s pimp—and whom she even cast as an extra.

Seven Beauties opened in broader release around the world in the fourth quarter of 1975, giving it exposure for Oscar consideration. In the end, the film came away with four nominations (including for Wertmuller and Giannini) but no wins. (Even in the Best Foreign Film category, it lost to Black and White in Color.)

For a while, it seemed that Wertmuller’s white eyeglasses would become as synonymous with Italian cinema as Fellini’s Borsalino fedora. Hollywood even came calling, courtesy of a four-film contract she signed with Warner Bros. But after the failed English-language A Night Full of Rain (1978), the studio canceled the remaining three projects.

The filmmaker returned to Italy, making 16 more films for the big screen—each one progressively more strident and less available in America than the last. 

Yet the likes of Jane Campion, Sofia Coppola, Kathryn Bigelow, and Greta Gerwig owe her a debt for making manifest the possibilities inherent in a female director’s vision—and Hollywood recognized that contribution by awarding her an Honorary Award, at age 91, for her career in 2019, two years before her death.

With Eurocommunism in fashion in the year of the release of Seven Beauties, few could have predicted the end of Marxism as a viable force. But fewer still could have guessed that far-right nationalism would stage a comeback in Wertmuller’s Italy a half-century later, let alone that it would enter the United States.

That situation makes viewing Seven Beauties far more disturbing today than it was at the time. Its opening minutes of World War II footage immediately connect an ignorant, benighted, machismo-dominated populace to life in a dictatorship.

Thinking, a socialist tells Pasqualino while the two are awaiting prison, is “the most atrocious crime a citizen could commit.” In the present state of democracies worldwide, thinking is as dangerous as Wertmuller’s political prisoner suggests, but also as much of an absolute necessity.