Saturday, September 26, 2026

Quote of the Day (Robert Browning, on How ‘Truth is Within Ourselves’)

“Truth is within ourselves; it takes no rise
    
From outward things, whate’er you may believe.     
There is an inmost centre in us all,    
Where truth abides in fullness; and around,  
Wall upon wall, the gross flesh hems it in,            
This perfect, clear perception—which is truth.         
A baffling and perverting carnal mesh          
Binds it, and makes all error: and, to KNOW,          
Rather consists in opening out a way
Whence the imprisoned splendour may escape,               
Than in effecting entry for a light      
Supposed to be without.”—English poet Robert Browning (1812–1889), Paracelsus (1835)

Friday, September 25, 2026

TV Quote of the Day (‘Yes, Prime Minister,’ In Which a High-Level Leaker Is Not Just Caught Out But Embarrassed)

[Sir Humphrey Appleby makes several highly indiscreet, "off-the-record" statements regarding government policy on unemployment and the media during an interview for a BBC radio documentary. implying the government lacks courage and that the true, harsh nature of unemployment policy is hidden. A tape of this outtake is sent to Humphrey, and the Prime Minister, Jim Hacker, obtains it, using it to blackmail Humphrey, turning the tables on his often-manipulative Cabinet Secretary.]

James Hacker [played by Paul Eddington, back turned in picture]: “How did your broadcast go?”

Sir Humphrey Appleby [played by Nigel Hawthorne, facing in picture] [quickly]: “Oh, very well, very well.”

Hacker [smiling, waiting to pounce]: “What did you say?”

Sir Humphrey: “Oh, nothing in particular. I think I pointed out some of the difficulties in allocating responsibilities as between [waving hands quickly] politicians and civil servants.”

Hacker: “But you were discreet?”

Sir Humphrey [more nervously]: “Why do you ask?”

Hacker: “Were you or weren't you?”

Sir Humphrey: “Yes!”

Hacker: “Yes you were or yes you weren’t?”

Sir Humphrey: “Yes.”

Hacker [prodding, with a cunning smile]: “Humphrey…”

Sir Humphrey: “Oh yes. Well, didn’t you expect me to be discreet?”

Hacker: “Well, yes, of course.”

Sir Humphrey [quickly trying to conclude this]: “Well, there you are, then!”

Hacker: “Well, that's all right, isn’t it?” [Sir Humphrey relaxes and smiles, thinking he’s escaped danger.]

Sir Humphrey: “Why do you ask, Prime Minister?” [He starts to sit down at last.]

Hacker: “Well, it's just that the BBC sent me a tape…” [Sir Humphrey shoots out of his seat, alarmed.]—Yes, Prime Minister, Season 2, Episode 8, “The Tangled Web,” original air date Jan. 28, 1988, teleplay by Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, directed by Sydney Lotterby

I wonder if a variation of this scene occurred recently on this side of the Atlantic Ocean? You know how the Trump Administration used a Politico story to justify denying it access to the White House grounds—all because of it having allegedly “threatened national security and/or spread falsehoods”?

Well, guess who the (once anonymous) source of that story was? None other than J.D. Vance, who, according to this Daily Beast article, wanted to put a positive spin on ongoing peace negotiations with Iran.

It all goes to show that when it comes to secrets divulged, Washington leaks from the top. Vance would just be the latest member of what the late great syndicated satirist Art Buchwald, back in March 1983, referred to as “the National Council of Office Leakers,” which meets weekly “and is chaired by a very high White House source.”

Thursday, September 24, 2026

Quote of the Day (Jessamyn West, on What Heals or Festers)

“A broken bone can heal, but the wound a word opens can fester forever.”— American novelist Jessamyn West (1902-1984), The Life I Really Lived (1979)

Wednesday, September 23, 2026

This Day in Jazz History (Birth of John Coltrane, Saxophonist Supreme)

Sept. 23, 1926— John Coltrane, a saxophonist, bandleader, and composer who, after overcoming a heroin addiction in his early 30s, achieved a spiritual awakening that fueled his subsequent jazz masterpieces, was born in Hamlet, NC.

Early on, the musical promise of this country boy was recognized by a bandleader only four months his senior: Miles Davis. But six years of dependence on heroin and alcohol turned Coltrane into an unsteady, unreliable member of the Davis quintet, leading to his abrupt ouster.

The way back nine months later into the good graces of the bandleader he called “Teacher” was harrowing: locking himself in his mother’s room in Philadelphia and, without medication or medical assistance, quitting his chemical dependence cold turkey.

For the decade remaining before he died of liver cancer, “Trane” gave thanks to God for his liberation from drugs, and sought a purity in sound that mirrored his ecstatic spiritual vision.

Particularly in albums like the Grammy-nominated A Love Supreme (1965), listeners discerned a spiritual path of devotion and redemption, open to all. In fact, for more than half a century, the African Orthodox Church, founded by Black Episcopalians critical of what they saw as racism in the larger denomination, has even officially canonized him, naming its San Francisco house of worship in his honor.

Not everyone felt well-disposed towards the even greater religious intensity his work assumed in the last couple of years of Coltrane’s life. Critic Stanley Crouch, for instance, for all his appreciation of the musician’s early work, dismissed his late ventures as “naive submission to actual noise and incompetence.”

But few would deny that Coltrane was relentlessly dedicated to practicing his craft, as well as pursuing a musical question as unexpected as his spiritual one.

“Sheets of sound” is how Downbeat jazz critic Ira Gitler described the vertical improvisational style emanating from Coltrane’s saxophone—dense layers of scales, modes and keys over an entire progression. It proved extremely influential. 

But Coltrane was uninterested in repeating himself, and his devotees could hardly keep up with his innovations over the course of the 25 albums he released as a bandleader in his abbreviated lifespan.

Even with the Great American Songbook, the corpus of popular standards that jazz has plumbed for years, Coltrane created something unique with his 1961 interpretation of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s “My Favorite Things.” He transformed that approximately three-minute chestnut from The Sound of Music into what Sam Stephenson called, in a 2014 blog post for The Paris Review, “a thirteen-minute warhorse of dominion.”

Like Davis, Coltrane was connected to the area of New Jersey where I live: Bergen County, NJ. Together they worked Cookin' with the Miles Davis Quintet in autumn 1956 at the Hackensack home studio of legendary jazz recording engineer Rudy Van Gelder. Leading his own band, Coltrane created three albums in Van Gelder’s later Englewood Cliffs studio, including, most notably, A Love Supreme.

(For a good, concise summary of Coltrane at his zenith, I recommend Patrick Jarenwattananon’s September 2010 blog post on—what else?—“Your Blog Supreme.”)

Quote of the Day (Edna St. Vincent Millay, on How Autumn ‘Shudders’ and ‘Clambers’)

“Now the autumn shudders
In the rose's root.
Far and wide the ladders
Lean among the fruit.
 
“Now the autumn clambers
Up the trellised frame,
And the rose remembers
The dust from which it came.” —Pulitzer Prize-winning American poet Edna St. Vincent Millay (1892-1950), “Autumn Chant,” in Edna St. Vincent Millay: Selected Poems, edited by J. D. McClatchy (Library of America edition, 2003)

Tuesday, September 22, 2026

This Day in Television History (‘Charlie's Angels’ Soars in Debut)

Sept. 22, 1976— Charlie's Angels, the latest product from the factory of TV writer-producer Aaron Spelling, quickly took flight in the Nielsen ratings following its premiere on ABC.

The series, featuring three beautiful women working for an unseen but often heard male owner of a detective agency, only heightened the criticism that Spelling was, according to the highbrow The New Yorker, a “schlock merchant.”

Spelling he laughed all the way to the bank, as his fantasy detective drama began what turned out to be five seasons in prime time.

This current post might not be the kind of elevated fare that longtime readers of this blog might recall from earlier items concerning, for instance, the Metropolitan Opera’s 1966 debut at Lincoln Center, the NY Times Jayson Blair scandal, or the death of landscape painter Thomas Moran.

But the show, even in its earliest incarnation a half-century ago, exerts a tenacious hold, particularly on those of a certain age. Just witness the social-media hoopla surrounding “Angel” Jaclyn Smith’s just-published memoir, and her appearance with former co-star Kate Jackson on The Drew Barrymore Show. 

Beyond that, the story of the show says much about manufacturing and maintaining fame, managing star egos, and an often-unacknowledged adjunct of TV production: attorneys on speed dial to launch or defend against lawsuits resulting from success.

Though Spelling, the most prolific producer in TV history (according to the Guinness Book of World Records) cheerfully acknowledged that his shows represented “mind candy,” this series—which made stars of Smith, Jackson, and Farrah Fawcett—was more like eye candy.

One nickname, more scornful, quickly caught on: “Jiggle TV,” for scenes focusing on its stars’ physical assets. The opening credits, with Smith in a bikini, would hardly be the last time that the show was associated with swimsuits.

In a fortuitous bit of marketing synergy, a poster featuring Fawcett in a red swimsuit went on sale right around the time the show premiered. By March 1977, five million copies were decorating bedrooms and dorms all across the country, making it, according to this 2020 Biography article, the bestselling poster of all time.

A year later, at the height of Farrahmania, an incorrect rumor circulated where I lived in Bergen County, NJ, that the former Texas model with the tousled blond hair was planning to live on the same street as Yankee catcher Thurman Munson in Norwood. The news was enough to lead one teenage guy I knew to vow to camp out overnight to catch sight of her!

Fawcett was careful to appear in a one-piece swimsuit to conceal a childhood scar on her stomach. No such problem existed for later Angel Cheryl Ladd, who, tired of being asked incessantly to wear a bikini on the show, finally came to the set one day with one that left very, very little to the imagination. 

In a 2016 oral history of Spelling in The Hollywood Reporter, the actress recalled, “I got a note from Aaron that said, ‘OK, little rebel, I got the point. And this will never happen again.’ But he didn’t mean I’d never be in a bikini again. It was more like, don’t try that again.”

Externals like clothes and hair absorbed much of Spelling’s attention, as they would for his later nighttime soap operas like Dynasty, Beverly Hills 90210, and Melrose Place. But the success of Charlie’s Angels meant that he would be ensnared, not always successfully, in keeping his stars satisfied. 

After one season, Fawcett quit to pursue other opportunities. Spelling and partner Leonard Goldberg filed a breach-of-contract lawsuit. (The case was settled out of court, with the actress agreeing on six guest appearances before bowing out.)

For her increasing annoyance with the show’s declining script quality, lack of compensation for suggesting the series’ name in the first place, and Spelling’s refusal to adjust her shooting schedule to allow for outside work like the Oscar-winning Kramer vs. Kramer, Jackson went from being nicknamed “The Smart One” among the angelic trio to being tagged “The Difficult One.” To her vast relief, she was gone after Season 3.

Smith would be the only one of the original trio to last all five seasons and 115 episodes of the show. Unlike, say, M*A*S*H or Cheers, where cast changes revitalized the series for the long haul, lineup alterations did not have a similar effect for Charlie’s Angels. Ratings were drooping when everyone decided to call it a day after the fifth season.

Spelling, Goldberg, and ABC executives may have felt particular relief in moving on. In 1979, husband and wife actors Robert Wagner and Natalie Wood, silent investors in the show but not listed as producers, sued Spelling for misappropriation of funds, claiming that he had channeled their money towards another crime show, Starsky and Hutch.

The investigation dragged on for a year, until the L.A. District Attorney’s office announced that there were “insufficient grounds to institute criminal charges.” With that, “Angelgate” was consigned to history, though it involved enduring questions about proving that head-scratching Hollywood bookkeeping represented fraud rather than sloppiness.

(More than two decades later, Wagner was back in court over the angels, this time hoping for a share of the profits from the two Charlie’s Angels feature films. He gained no satisfaction or money from that lawsuit, either.)

Astonishingly, nearly decades after the show went off the air, it was revived as a multi-media franchise, on film (Charlie's Angels, 2000; Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle, 2003, and a 2019 reboot), TV again (a short-lived 2011 series and an animated web series), and even a video game.

That subsequent history underscored how much the series confounded its critics.  Its appeal to male viewers was, well, obvious. (Hint: it had nothing to do with plots!) But I was surprised to discover that even among females, the show had its defenders.

In my high school yearbook, for instance, several female classmates listed among their memories “C’s A’s.” It took me a while to surmise that this referred to their time together watching Charlie’s Angels in its original Wednesday night slots.

Drew Barrymore must have felt a similar affinity for the show, as she not only starred in the two film versions of the early aughts but produced them. The appeal of the show for her? Girl Power—a reminder in the new millennium that Sisterhood Is Powerful.

Quote of the Day (Lee Bollinger, on How Authoritarian Threats to Higher Education Developed)

“You would have to go back to the McCarthy period in the 1950s to see something comparable to what’s happening today. For many decades we lived free from government efforts to seize control of universities and suppress criticism and independent thought. And in this time, we forged individualistic identities. We want our students and our faculty to think of themselves as loyal to our particular institution, and at the same time, we’re competing for students and faculty against other schools. So we’ve set up a system in which institutions have individual identities and compete with one another, and this makes us more vulnerable to authoritarian efforts to undermine us.”—Former Columbia University President Lee Bollinger interviewed by Paul Hond, “Defending the Fifth Branch: A Response to Authoritarian Attacks on Universities,” Columbia Magazine, Spring/Summer 2026

With the academic year in full swing now, new threats are sure to develop against America's colleges and universities, even beyond the wide-ranging war aged by the Trump Administration outlined in Cecelia Smith-Schoenwalder's US News article from earlier this month. 

In the face of all of this, Bollinger advocates “the equivalent of a NATO charter, with an Article 5 for universities in the US: If any institution among us is attacked, all of us will come to its defense.”

That may be not just the best way, but the only way to proceed now. Following President Trump’s ban on CNN, Politico and MS NOW, the White House TV pool, which includes CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and Fox, responded by not covering him last night. (Predictably, the President counterattacked with—what else?—“Trump TV.”)

If the pool’s strategy works, other American institutions—like higher education and prominent law firms—should follow with a similar resort to collective action.

(The image of Lee Bollinger that accompanies this post was taken on Oct. 11, 2007, by Daniella Zalcman.)