For three
decades under artistic director Jonathan Bank, the Mint Theater Company
has carved out a small but valuable Off-Broadway niche by reviving unjustly
neglected theater. That tradition continued in sparkling fashion with its production
of a 1913 dramedy by the British woman of letters Cicely Hamilton.
During her
lifetime (1872-1952), Hamilton wrote with energy and conviction in several
genres: journalism, fiction, and memoir. Often, this feminist castigated what
seems to have enraged her the most: the subjugation of women. The
governess-turned-rebel title character of Phyl (which closed this past weekend at the Mint Theater) represented an especially vibrant example of such wayward
social freethinkers.
At Oxford
University, where the play was originally set to premiere in 1913, that
attitude didn’t appeal to its Vice Chancellor, who heavily criticized
Hamilton’s view of marriage as an only marginally valuable institution.
The
author explained to a friend that “PHYL has passed the Lord Chamberlain, who did
not require the alteration of a single line, but the Vice Chancellor appears to
possess a kind of medieval power in these matters…you may make fun of a
departure from conventional ideas, but apparently you are not allowed to treat
it seriously.”
Luckily
the university kept copies of all plays submitted for approval—a godsend,
because, despite acclaimed runs in Brighton, Edinburgh, Manchester and even Chicago
over the following year, Phyl was never published. That archive was
where the manuscript was found years later when Jonathan Bank, curious
about scattered references to the play, went searching for it.
He
found gold in Ms. Hamilton’s heroine, Phyllis (Phyl) Chester, an English
governess tasked with handling two bratty daughters and their snobby
mother.
“I’m
shut away from men in my own station of life—whatever that may be—as I’m shut
away from everyone else,” Phyl moans. “That’s what I’m paid for—to be shut
away. I look on and see other people happy—and, O God! I do so want to be happy
myself…”
Even
Phyl’s much older sister, Cathy, offers no appropriate example, having
sacrificed her own happiness to help raise Phyl after their mother’s death left
them orphaned. The issue is forced when Phyl, pushed too far, blows up at her
two young charges and finds herself out of the Ponsonby household.
An
unexpected savior appears in the form of Jack Folliott (played with charm,
subtlety and sympathy by Anthony Michael Martinez), a visitor that Mrs.
Ponsonby had sized up as marriage material for her oldest daughter. At first
merely fearing sorry for Phyl, he finds himself drawn to her
A
relationship with Jack offers Phyl access to money that will buy her all the
things she has missed for years. But what will respectable people think if they
discover the two are living together? And can their love survive if this scion
of a wealthy family discovers that his trust fund has been looted?
Hamilton
was part of a British theatrical tradition, stretching from George Bernard Shaw
to Miles Malleson (whose Yours Unfaithfully was adapted by the Mint in
2017), that questioned contemporary attitudes about marriage.
But this
suffragette differed from these males by writing with a bone-deep understanding
of the challenges that a young woman with no prospects faced in a limited
sociopolitical environment. She was very well served by the care and brio that
the Mint creative team brought to this production.
Lily Ganser was a
particularly vibrant presence as Phyl, and Martinez carefully showed how his
character—one whose intentions the audience was fully prepared to
question—possessed an inner sense of honor that matched his outward sense of
humor.
Katie Firth’s Mrs. Ponsonby demonstrated how her character,
preternaturally oriented towards bullying, could be comically thrown for a loss
when her expectations were overturned. Livvy Marcus, Charlotte Van Ledtje, and Tessa
Bilmes were pitch-perfect as the young daughters already showing the baleful
impact of their mother’s “moral” training.
At
the performance I attended, the Mint continued its tradition of post-show
“Enrichment Activities” in which speakers discuss an aspect of the production
with the audience.
In
this case, artistic director Jonathan Bank led director Britt Berke, dramaturge
Amy Stoller, and the design team members Brittany Vasta (sets), M.L. Geiger
(lighting), and Jane Shaw (sound) shared insights into the staging of the show,
including how they used these elements to suggest Phyl’s psychological
development and how they worked around the theater’s unique size dimensions.
Today’s
theatergoers will not be shocked by Phyl’s challenges to class and sex
conventions the way that its initial audiences were. But Hamilton’s feminist
cry of the heart still had charm to spare in this typically handsomely,
tastefully mounted Mint production.