Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Quote of the Day (Carl Hiaasen, on the Growing Necessity for Reporters)

“People can’t get outraged [at the political arena] without rapid access to solid, useful information—what we used to call journalism. There’s so much garbage being disguised as fact and so many gasbags posing as sages; somebody has to cut through the crap. That’s the job of reporters, and their job will be more important than at any time in history. There’s been this great lamentation about the end of newspapers as we know them, the end of the era of the paper hitting your doorstep in the morning, but I don’t think the language or the craft of writing is dying. In the next 40 years, there’s going to be a larger demand than ever for people who can communicate with the written word, whatever format it takes.”—American crime novelist and retired Miami Herald columnist Carl Hiaasen, “Slipping Backward” (part of a “40 Things To Know” article cluster), interviewed by T. A. Frail, Smithsonian, July-August 2010

Fifteen years ago today, in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court opened the floodgates for unlimited campaign spending to corporations and other outside groups by ruling that any restrictions constituted a violation of freedom of speech.

In his Smithsonian Q&A, Hiaasen denounced the decision as “toxic to the whole democratic process,” and correctly predicted that “From now on, it’s basically going to be all the free speech that money can buy.”

Besides the communication skill that Hiaasen identified, more will be needed for the journalism of the present and future to affect the political process, however: the fearlessness of its practitioners and the open-mindedness of its readers. The portents for both these factors are deeply troubling right now.

While the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has twisted freedom of speech beyond recognition, it has permitted a lack of legal accountability for a President’s misdeeds and signaled, through Associate Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, that its landmark New York Times v. Sullivan freedom of the press ruling might be up for reconsideration.

Even with an unfettered press, there’s no guarantee that, in the present digital environment dominated by what Hiaasen calls “gasbags posing as sages,” their revelations will be acted upon. 

Confirmation bias”—the tendency to seek out and accept anything supporting our beliefs and ignoring anything contradicting them—has only solidified in the current polarized environment.

I’m not sure that I am any more hopeful than Hiaasen was 15 years ago. I only know that not to push back against these troubling trends constitutes preemptive, unconditional surrender that will haunt the democratic process now and into the foreseeable future. 

(For more information on the baleful effects of Citizen United—including the influx of secret “dark money” into elections—and what can be done to bring about campaign finance reform, I urge you to read Tim Lau’s December 2019 report for the nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice.)

Monday, January 20, 2025

Quote of the Day (Erasmus, on Leaders, Flatterers and the Truth)

“Yet in the midst of all their prosperity, princes in this respect seem to me most unfortunate, because, having no one to tell them truth, they are forced to receive flatterers for friends.” — Dutch monk and scholar Desiderius Erasmus (1469-1536), In Praise of Folly (1509)

Sunday, January 19, 2025

Quote of the Day (Isaac Bashevis Singer, on a Creator’s ‘Inner Vision and Its Ultimate Expression’)

“Every creator painfully experiences the chasm between his inner vision and its ultimate expression. The chasm is never completely bridged. We all have the conviction, perhaps illusory, that we have much more to say than appears on the paper.”— Polish-born Jewish-American novelist, short-story writer, memoirist, essayist, and translator—and Nobel Literature laureate— Isaac Bashevis Singer (1904-1991), quoted in Aspects of I. B. Singer, edited by Joseph Landis (1986)

Spiritual Quote of the Day (Book of Exodus, With Laws of Justice)

“You shall not utter a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man, to be a malicious witness. You shall not follow a multitude to do evil; nor shall you bear witness in a suit, turning aside after a multitude, so as to pervert justice; nor shall you be partial to a poor man in his suit….

“You shall not pervert the justice due to your poor in his suit. Keep far from a false charge, and do not slay the innocent and righteous, for I will not acquit the wicked. And you shall take no bribe, for a bribe blinds the officials, and subverts the cause of those who are in the right.

“You shall not oppress a stranger; you know the heart of a stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.”—Exodus 23: 1-3, 6-9 (Revised Standard Version)

Moses, the prototypical Judeo-Christian lawgiver, is depicted in the image accompanying this post, Moses With the Ten Commandments. It was created in 1659 by the Dutch Golden Age painter, printmaker, and draughtsman Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, AKA Rembrandt (1606-1669).

Saturday, January 18, 2025

Quote of the Day (Mike Davis, on How Southern California ‘Transgressed Environmental Common Sense’)

“Los Angeles has deliberately put itself in harm’s way. For generations, market-driven urbanization has transgressed environmental common sense. Historic wildfire corridors have been turned into view-lot suburbs, wetland liquefaction zones into marinas, and floodplains into industrial districts and housing tracts. Monolithic public works have been substituted for regional planning and a responsible land ethic. As a result, Southern California has reaped flood, fire and earthquake tragedies that were as avoidable, as unnatural, as the beating of Rodney King and the ensuing explosion in the streets.”— Urban theorist and historian Mike Davis (1946-2022), Ecology of Fear: Los Angeles and the Imagination of Disaster (1998)

In this weekend’s Wall Street Journal, columnist Peggy Noonan, remembering how her family’s house in New Jersey burned down over 50 years ago, observes that “you never get over a fire.” More problematically, she contends that “All disasters have political reverberations,” and, in particular, that after the Palisades wildfires of this past week, there will likely be “a new shift, a reorientation toward reality.”

I have the utmost respect for the writing style that won Ms. Noonan a Pulitzer Prize, and sometimes find myself agreeing with her arguments. But her most recent column epitomizes so much of the mistaken and misdirected commentary that has raged, high and low, in the wake of this catastrophe that has already burned more than 90,000 acres, displaced 92,000 residents and cost more than two dozen lives.

Although her latest reflections show no understanding of either the long history or still relatively recent events that have led Southern California to this pass, what is truly shocking is that so many other comments in the public and private sphere are far worse—ranging from the wildly irrelevant to the astonishingly ill-informed.

This past Sunday, a priest in my parish related how dumbfounded he felt when a friend called to claim that God was punishing California for all the abortions in the state. From the opposite side of the political spectrum, some have seen this as God’s judgment on the U.S. for abetting the enormous loss of life in Gaza.

A few days ago, a member of a Facebook group devoted to the work of novelist and Christian apologist C.S. Lewis set off a ferocious debate by posting a meme with a fake photo of an Oscar statuette burnt to a crisp—presumably representing divine judgment on liberal, godless Hollywood.

For sure, L.A. Mayor Karen Bass should be embarrassed for making a trip to Ghana that broke her campaign promise to stick close to home—and this at a time when the area’s weather condition had become increasingly vulnerable. But just as surely, her responsibility for the disaster is being exaggerated by rivals past and present, outside and inside her party, who dream of occupying her office themselves someday.

More important, though the level of the disaster might be unprecedented, its occurrence is anything but. It might, in fact, be more proper to speak of the recurrence of wildfires.

Which brings us to Mike Davis and the above quote.

Upon his death two years ago, the British paper The Guardian hailed him for offering “prophetic warnings” about so much related to Southern California’s environment. But I doubt that Davis would claim any such powers of divination.

If anything, he would say, he was only pointing out that disasters had already happened in the state, that they had happened again, and—based on that record and the unrestrained growth spurring it in the first place—it was practically guaranteed that disaster would strike again.

Ms. Noonan faults progressive California politicians for preoccupation with “unquantifiable secondary and tertiary issues” like climate change.

But as far back as 1998, Davis warned that Malibu was already “the wildfire capital of North America and, possibly, the world”:

“At least once a decade a blaze in the chaparral grows into a terrifying firestorm consuming hundreds of homes in an inexorable advance across the mountains to the sea. Since 1970 five such holocausts have destroyed more than one thousand luxury residences and inflicted more than $1 billion in property damage. Some unhappy homeowners have been burnt out twice in a generation, and there are individual patches of coastline or mountain, especially between Point Dume and Tuna Canyon, that have been incinerated as many as eight times since 1930.”

What lay behind all this, Davis wrote, was a “selfish, profit-driven presentism.” Politicians and developers rebuffed proposals to preserve parks, beaches, playgrounds and mountain reserves for the community, choosing instead an “artificial borderland of chaparral and suburb [that] magnified the natural fire danger while creating new perils for firefighters who now had to defend thousands of individual structures as well as battle the fire front itself.”

Ms. Noonan sees the three-decade dominance of the Democratic Party in the state as a major reason for the failure to contain the fire. I even agree with her that “A one-party state will yield one-party rule that encourages, sloth, carelessness and corruption.”

But she ignores the long postwar history when Republicans, at the state and federal level, were equally responsible as Democrats, if not more so, for the lack of control on growth. (And, if one-party rule poses grave difficulties for governance, she has been noticeably silent about the dangers posed by the current GOP control of the three branches of the federal government.)

Couple this destructive postwar development trend with the current months-long drought—among the “feedback loops” in the delicate ecosystem that Davis pointed out—and you have the necessary conditions for the most recent natural disaster.

Mother Nature belongs to no political party, Ms. Noonan, and will not be disrespected by either Republicans or Democrats. At long last, after so much time, Mother Nature has imposed such high costs associated with insurance and rebuilding that growth in Southern California may be halted, even reversed.

In the meantime, let’s not blame the most recent conflagration on an angry Almighty. And while we’re at it, let’s lay off the ecological Cassandras that tried to alert government officials, business professionals, and residents about what all too sadly, has now occurred.

Friday, January 17, 2025

Quote of the Day (Adam Ratner, on the Origin of the Recent Anti-Vaccination Movement)

“Early vaccine hesitancy mostly centered on pockets of resistance to the DTP vaccine, which covers diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. The shift in focus to the MMR vaccine, which bundles measles, mumps, and rubella, got a big push in 1998, when a doctor named Andrew Wakefield published an article in the British medical journal The Lancet that hypothesized that children who received the MMR vaccine were more likely to develop autism. Its convoluted reasoning had to do with the way the viruses from the vaccine replicated in the intestine. The article was fraudulent, unethical, and wrong, and The Lancet later retracted it. Wakefield lost his medical license, but his baseless claims have had enormous staying power. With autism rates on the rise, worried parents were desperate for explanations, and Wakefield supplied an easy one.”—Pediatrician-author Adam Ratner, interviewed by Lorraine Glennon, “Dangerous Consequences,” Columbia Magazine, Winter 2024-25

The other day, scanning the profile of a friend of a friend on Facebook, I noticed that this proponent of homeopathic medicine also believed in something considerably more pernicious.

Memes she had posted supporting the anti-vaccination (or, in an undoubtedly poll-tested phrase, “medical freedom”) movement were even more numerous than those of herself and her family. I could only shake my head over this kind of fanaticism spreading through the digital world.

I wish someone could have sent her a link to Dr. Ratner’s interview with Columbia Magazine, though I’m afraid that, without the slightest bit of evidence, she would dismiss him as a champion of “Big Pharma” simply because he takes a position in direct opposition to hers.

I read the above quote from Dr. Ratner with great interest and dismay but little surprise. At one time, Andrew Wakefield’s faulty research would not only have been refuted, but also so decisively sidelined that few people would read it and even fewer spread it.

Now, of course, it’s all different. Even 15 years ago, anti-vax resistance was forming in the nascent Tea Party movement. COVID-19 turned these diehards into protesters.

Articles in yesterday’s New York Times by Apoorva Mandavilli and Francesca Paris, with accompanying graphs, add details to Dr. Ratner’s contentions. This time, anti-vax skepticism has moved beyond COVID to polio, measles, and other once-common childhood diseases that, too optimistically, were believed to be eradicated not long ago.

“Herd immunity”—the indirect protection for a population, achieved by vaccination rates of at least 95%--is being breached in geographic areas ranging from large urban districts to small rural ones.

Opposition to vaccination is being fueled by legislative efforts that soften vaccination mandates, as well as by podcasters, cable “news” propagandists, opportunistic politicians, and social media “experts” who claim to be “just asking questions” when they are utterly uninterested in any from vaccination advocates who would contest flimsy evidence.

Amid the multiple and massive horrors of the 20th century, improved public health stands out as an unqualified triumph.  In contrast, vaccination doubters are responsible for spreading too many diseases that cause unnecessary discomfort and deaths. In this case, ignorance is anything but bliss.

TV Quote of the Day (‘Mad Men,’ on Inferior Ad Submissions)

[Two ad firm partners are discussing the portfolio of a spouse’s cousin.]

Don Draper [played by Jon Hamm]: “His book.” [Chuckles] “It was filled with old ads.”

Roger Sterling [played by John Slattery]: [Chuckles] “Plagiarism. That's resourceful.”

Don: “He had five originals. There were all the same thing.”

Roger: “I told him to be himself. That was pretty mean, I guess.”—Mad Men, Season 4, Episode 6, “Waldorf Stories,” original air date Aug 29, 2010, teleplay by Brett Johnson and Matthew Weiner, directed by Scott Hornbacher