"When falsehood can look so like the truth, who can
assure themselves of certain happiness? I feel as if I were walking on the edge
of a precipice, towards which thousands are crowding and endeavouring to plunge
me into the abyss.” —English novelist Mary Shelley (1797-1851), Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus (1818)
A Wall Street Journal article by Ed Finn and David H. Guston reminded me that 200 years ago
this month, Frankenstein made an
inauspicious beginning—released anonymously by a little-known British
publishing house that, when sales languished, discounted the title.
That wasn’t the only indignity faced by 21-year-old
author Mary Shelley, who, when sales finally began to climb and gossip soon
spread about its possible author, had to endure sexist speculation that a mere
woman couldn’t have produced such an original work without high-powered
help—either husband Percy Bysshe Shelley.
In their provocative essay, Finn and Guston observe
that, only now, through genetic engineering, has the central premise of the
novel—the unintended, horrifying consequences of scientific creation of
life—finally come to the fore.
For all its vast, often take-for-granted, influence
on science-fiction and horror literature (and, after the 1931 big-screen adaptation
starring Boris Karloff, cinema), Frankenstein
still has the capacity to jolt and shock, much like Victor’s obsessive electromagnetic
experimentation.
Today’s “Quote” is one example. It’s placed in the
middle of dialogue by Elizabeth, Victor’s fiancée, a character, in her sweet
innocence, often regarded as a drip.
But her statement, shot through with irony (she has
no idea that Victor is responsible for creating the monster now marauding
through the countryside), made me sit up and take notice when I first
encountered the words.
In the petri dish of politics, American voters
conducted their own mad experiment: electing to the Oval Office—heck,
entrusting responsibility for the fate of mankind—not only someone with neither
political nor national-security experience, but a man who, throughout his adult
life, has never evinced the slightest regard for the truth.
After walking away, for an extended period, from
observing politics, commentator Andrew Sullivan emerged to gasp at Donald Trump’s
emergence as a Presidential candidate. “I was happy doing that and was hoping
to continue, when this Grendel started stirring in the forest,” he explained in
an interview with The New York Times. “You could almost see the coffee vibrate on
the table, as this creature came out of the swamp.”
That analogy is close, but not quite comparable to
what we see now. Grendel, you see, implies the existence of a Beowulf, a
solitary hero who will slay him. No such personage appears remotely on the horizon
for us.
In the first third of the last century, most of
Europe fell under the sway of a liar of staggering proportions who did indeed lead
the continent into an abyss of violence and shame. Nobody ever dreamed that such
a monster could emerge on our shores. But why should we think we are so different from everyone else?
No comments:
Post a Comment