Showing posts with label Kirk Douglas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirk Douglas. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Quote of the Day (Robert Louis Stevenson, on a First Encounter With Edward Hyde)



“Mr. Hyde was pale and dwarfish, he gave an impression of deformity without any nameable malformation, he had a displeasing smile, he had borne himself to the lawyer with a sort of murderous mixture of timidity and boldness, and he spoke with a husky, whispering and somewhat broken voice; all these were points against him, but not all of these together could explain the hitherto unknown disgust, loathing, and fear with which Mr. Utterson regarded him. ‘There must be something else,’ said the perplexed gentleman. ‘There is something more, if I could find a name for it. God bless me, the man seems hardly human! Something troglodytic, shall we say? or can it be the old story of Dr. Fell? or Is it the mere radiance of a foul soul that thus transpires through, and transfigures, its clay continent? The last, I think; for, O my poor old Harry Jekyll, if ever I read Satan’s signature upon a face, it Is on that of your new friend.’”— Scottish fiction writer Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-1894), “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” (1886)

The creation of Edward Hyde, the embodiment of pure evil in the physical ugliness so vividly portrayed above, is what has led so many to view this “Strange Tale” as a horror story.

But there is another horror that, to Dr. Henry Jekyll, might be just as dismaying: Hyde’s creator and opposite is not a saint, but the same old Jekyll: a proper, basically decent Victorian gentleman who cannot banish his primal urges—“that incongruous compound of whose reformation and improvement I had already learned to despair.”

According to a fascinating Huffington Post piece by Melanie Kendry, “When Does a Man Become a Monster?”, the original draft by Robert Louis Stevenson indicated that the crime of the “ordinary secret sinner” Jekyll was not murder (or even the consorting with prostitutes shown in so many cinematic versions) but homosexuality. 

It was an anticipation of a later, wittier, but equally horrifying story of a double man in Victorian society, Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray. Such were the taboos of the time in England, however, that even in the latter, more daring case, Gray’s secret sexuality could only be implied.

(The image accompanying this post shows John Barrymore, in the classic 1920 silent film version of Stevenson’s novella. Remarkably, Barrymore depicted the violent and disturbing physical transformation into Hyde without benefit of special effects. As fine as the 1933 Fredric March performance was—worthy enough of an Oscar---I still prefer Barrymore’s. I may be the only person I know who still recalls Kirk Douglas’ performance in a 1973 TV musical adaptation of the tale by composer Lionel Bart. That production was a horror story all its own!)

Saturday, December 10, 2016

Appreciations: Kirk Douglas at 100: Hollywood’s Driven Ulysses



The first time I recall seeing Kirk Douglas on the big screen was in early elementary school, at a former depot station that my hometown was trying to determine how to re-use. As part of that effort, the city replayed, on a temporary basis, old family-oriented movies (e.g., Disney’s Johnny Tremain, Kidnapped) that were cheap to rent and wouldn’t compete with the cinema just down the street.

Fifty years later, I can’t recall how much the Douglas feature, Ulysses, resembled its source material, The Odyssey. But the choice of the title character said much about Douglas’ own personality and career: resourceful, indomitable, possessed of an iron will that carried all before him.

In later years, Douglas would remember his co-star on other films, John Wayne, as a “personality star” who more or less played himself from project to project. But surely, Douglas—born 100 years ago yesterday in Amsterdam, N.Y.—infused the characters he played with his own charm, complexity and intensity.

You could not take your eyes off him, and for reasons other than that famous cleft chin that female film watchers (and, by his own admission, female co-stars) could ever get enough of. As great stars do, he could hold the screen with his gaze. He could be cajoling or intimidating, with one often tumbling immediately after the other.

But these different behaviors derived from the same ineradicable hunger, as this child of Jewish immigrants—“the ragman’s son,” in the title of his first autobiography—grasped all too well. And a mass audience understood, too. Filmgoers might find his characters cruel and hateful at times, but in recognizing their source, glimpsed their flawed humanity, too.

Like his contemporary and frequent co-star, Burt Lancaster, Douglas burst onto the Hollywood scene immediately after WWII. That massive conflict exposed Americans to a darkness in the world they had only dimly perceived before Pearl Harbor. It also prepared filmgoers for a cinema that acknowledged this reality and actors who could embody it.

Film noir, the genre of tough guys trying to survive in a dangerous, treacherous world, furnished an ideal vehicle for both Lancaster (The Killers) and Douglas (The Strange Love of Martha Ivers and Out of the Past). Both actors could have used their muscular physiques simply to star in the kind of superhero roles often associated with Victor Mature and Arnold Schwarzenegger, but they were interested far more in how that kind of strength lent their characters simultaneously a foothold and a vulnerability in a violent, corrupt environment, especially in boxing (Lancaster again, in The Killers; Douglas, in his first Oscar-nominated role, Champion).

Uninterested in playing conventional superheroes, Douglas was drawn more often to obsessives. Their desires and wounds translated into quests that could lift those around him—or, if they could not go along with his journey, upend them utterly. That carried over into many different characters in many different genres—athlete, policeman (Detective Story), reporter bent on a scoop (Ace in the Hole), movie producer (The Bad and the Beautiful), depressed painter (Lust for Life), slave who defies an empire (Spartacus), and modern-day rebellious cowboy (Lonely Are the Brave, a personal favorite of the actor). 

One of Douglas’ obsessions, after playing the role on Broadway, was bringing Ken Kesey's One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest to the big screen. After trying for more than a decade, only to be told that he had now become too old to play the part of psychiatric-institute rebel Randall McMurphy, Douglas passed the property along to son Michael, who produced the Oscar-winning film starring Jack Nicholson in the role that Kirk had coveted.

Yet Douglas couldn’t turn away from this character who, like himself, defied the odds. More than 20 years after he played the role, he found a character with strong similarities to it: a feisty former baseball coach confined to an eldercare institution who finds himself in opposition to its administrator (Elizabeth Montgomery) in the TV movie Amos. 

In his personal life, Douglas has survived much as he has aged: a double-knee replacement, heart surgery to install a peacemaker, a helicopter crash that killed others on board, and a massive stroke that necessitated nearly endless rehabilitation. In 1996, still less than a year after the stroke, he accepted an honorary Oscar for his 50 years in the movies. He looked into the audience. "I see my four sons," he said. "They are proud of the old man!"

As well they should be. 

Friday, June 12, 2015

Movie Quote of the Day (‘Ace in the Hole,’ on Writing the News)



“I can handle big news and little news. And if there's no news, I'll go out and bite a dog.” —Unscrupulous reporter Charles Tatum (played by Kirk Douglas), in Ace in the Hole (1951), screenplay by Billy Wilder, Lesser Samuels and Walter Newman, directed by Billy Wilder

Sunday, March 23, 2014

This Day in Theater History (‘Detective Story,’ Tragedy in Station House, Opens)



March 23, 1949— Detective Story, a gritty drama featuring wisecracking, world-weary cops, petty crooks, eccentrics, and a secret that shatters the calm of its New York station-house setting, premiered at Broadway’s Hudson Theatre, beginning the first of 581 performances—as well as the squad-room genre that would shortly become a mainstay of television.

The Manhattan melodrama’s run turned out to be the second-longest in the career of playwright Sidney Kingsley, who had already won a Pulitzer Prize before the age of 30 for Men in White (itself a parent of another TV genre, the medical show). 

Nowadays, however, if it is known at all, it will be primarily because of the excellent 1951 film adaptation, directed by William Wyler and starring Kirk Douglas (pictured here), which occasionally appears on Turner Classic Movies.

It’s not hard to see why the play is not performed as frequently as it used to be: 

*Its 30-plus speaking parts mean a serious drain on the resources of Broadway houses, never mind Off-Broadway or regional theaters. 

*Its hard-boiled slang lies submerged not only under generations of newer phrases but under profanity-laced dramas, across all entertainment media, that make Kingsley’s squad room look like Disney World. 

*The plot point once considered explosive—abortion—is now no longer a criminal offense, and has even ruled by the Supreme Court as a constitutional right. 

*The cynical police reporter and the Irish American-dominated squad room (including one officer, a law unto himself who causes endless trouble for his by-the-book superior) are regarded as cliched. 

*The ending is simply seen as unbelievable.

It amuses me, then, after a rare revival is staged, as it has, the last 15 years, in places such as Chicago or Canada’s Shaw Festival, when the local reviewer praises it. Surely, it must be due to the efforts of the director or crew on the hoary material, the review seems to imply—never the playwright.

To be sure, the drama does have its problems—notably, that reporter, who comes on every once in a while to Tell the Audience What To Think, as if it needs a reference to Captain Ahab to understand that the protagonist is a vengeful obsessive, or that, for a democracy to exist, the press, the people, the cops, and the courts must always check on each other.

But the play lives (as does Wyler’s largely faithful adaptation). Kingsley, a thoroughgoing theater professional, painstakingly researched his dramas, then, because he also usually directed them himself, just as painstakingly staged them. He caught the way a station house could be filled with so much tedium that its occupants would do almost anything to relieve it—until the point when, all of a sudden, the premonitory joke that they are “ripe for a homicide” becomes a terrifying reality.

If you want to understand how shows such as Hill Street Blues, NYPD Blue, or the various Law and Order series (or, on the comic side, Barney Miller) have dominated network fare for so long, look no further than Kingsley. 

His play's title might have initially misled those who expected a standard exercise in the detective as hyperrational problem solver. 

But he realized that the squad room could be more than a venue for ratiocination, even for his stated hope of awakening postwar America to the dangers to democracy spelled by unchecked, powerful investigatory units. 

No, like Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman (which itself had premiered on Broadway only the month before), Kingsley was translating the conventions of ancient Greek tragedy for a modern audience.

I mean this in two senses. First, Kingsley strictly adhered to the classical unities for tragedy set out by Aristotle, of time (the plot occurs within 24 hours), space (the single setting of the station house) and, arguably, action (subplots—except for the one involving a mousy female shoplifter, played by an amazing Lee Grant—all contribute to the main action).   

Second, Kingsley, in effect, created a Sophoclean station house. Oedipus Rex has been called the first detective story, as a guarantor of order follows a clue that will solve a mystery: a crime that is imperiling the health of his city. Similarly, Lt. Jim McLeod of the 21st Precinct pursues every lead that will put away an abortion doctor whose incompetence has resulted in several deaths. Just as Oedipus blindly pursues his quarry, unaware that the source of the pestilence and crime lies closely than he ever could guess, a bewildered McLeod angrily disregards warnings that his pursuit of the abortion doctor holds personal dangers for himself. McLeod is even, in a sense, struggling through an oedipal conflict: resentment of his father for mistreating his mother so badly that she ended up in an insane asylum, a bitterness now so poisonous that he can’t compromise in any realm of his life, whether in giving a break to suspects who have made a single mistake or to the wife who has done likewise.

As with Kingsley’s other major foray into social realism, Dead End (also adapted to film by Wyler), ethnicity figures strongly into Detective Story. 

Although Italians, Greeks, even African-Americans are among the cast of characters, the lion’s share of the names reflects the heavy representation of Irish-Americans on the New York City police at the time (and even, to a somewhat diminished extent, to this day). 

Though Kingsley was himself Jewish, most of his police characters engage in a dialogue that pivots implicitly on the demands of Christianity.

McLeod’s fury over his wife’s abortion and the premarital love affair that preceded it seems overshadowed by his church’s insistence that the act is a mortal sin. 

But it is also part of a worldview in which he is preternaturally disposed to mistrust all motives and to judge rather than forgive. When he tells partner Lou Brody, “I am not a Christian,” he is actually referring to his eye-for-an-eye mentality. 

On the other hand, Brody embodies the precepts of Christ probably as well as anyone in that workplace can. His first appearance onstage is carrying in sandwiches for everyone, and he comes by his empathy for the embezzlement suspect Arthur (whom McLeod insists on prosecuting) because he sees something of his dead son in this decorated war veteran.

The final scene—McLeod’s death at the hands of a suspect who has swiped a gun off an unsuspecting officer in the station house—fuses the perspectives of Greek tragedy and Christianity. 

The detective’s suffering (the loss of his wife) and impending death leads to both an Aristotelian notion of purification (catharsis) and a Christian one, as he atones for his former lack of forgiveness by tearing up the complaint against Arthur.

Two members of the Broadway cast, Ralph Bellamy (who lost out to Douglas when it came time to cast McLeod for the film) and Horace McMahon (who repeated his role as Lt. Monaghan, McLeod’s tough-but-fair boss), went on to play cops on television (Bellamy, in Man Against Crime, aka Follow that Man; McMahon, on Naked City). 

In a sense, they were the first occupiers of ground carefully prepared by Kingsley, who found, in the confined setting of a station house, outsized, elemental emotions and themes dating back to the Greeks: fate, love, jealousy, hatred, order and its discontents, anguished self-recognition, and mercy. 

In the process, he helped shape the template of the TV police procedural that made the cops’ everyday stresses even more important than the clues and circumstances of a particular case.

(A longtime resident of Bergen County, NJ, where I come from, Kingsley remained active in the community long after his last play, Night Life, opened on Broadway in 1962. Partly in tribute to wife Madge Evans, a child star in silent films made in Fort Lee, he became the founding chairman of New Jersey's Motion Picture and Television Development Commission in 1977, charged with luring movie makers to the state. This Oakland resident also made a big impression early in the life of Ramapo College, where he visited and read plays submitted to one of its spring arts festivals. A friend of mine who attended the school in those days recalled him as a “gracious man” who preached the importance of researching the facts surrounding a play so that they, along with the characters, become part of the conflict.)