Feb. 13, 1883—A heart attack suffered on vacation in
Venice may have ended the life of Richard Wagner at age 69, but the tumult he engendered outlived him. It survives,
in some ways, even hotter today, as biographers, musicologists, even the entire
German nation consider whether this musical revolutionary spurred reactionary
politics that infected an entire continent.
The controversy starts, though, with Wagner’s
personal life. Over a week ago, Joseph Horowitz’s article in The Wall Street Journal took to task Simon
Callow for propagating the “monster” myth about the composer in the
actor-biographer’s new book, Being Wagner.
To be sure, Horowitz is correct that Wagner was an
early victim of “fake news." The article cites an 1866 newspaper report that,
ignoring generous-to-a-fault payments Wagner made his estranged wife Minna,
claimed that she had been reduced to poverty following their separation.
Horowitz might just as easily have mentioned the rumor that Wagner’s fatal
cardiac incident resulted from his argument with second wife Cosima over
excessive attention to a 23-year-old soprano who played one of the
flower-maidens in his recent triumph, Parsifal.
In one way, it is surprising that so much murkiness
has developed around what Wagner did, said, or meant, as he is virtually
unrivaled among composers in the documentation he left about himself
(approximately 12,000 letters, along with additional prose works that are
projected to run to eight volumes when scholars complete the task by 2030).
But, on second thought, such a swirl of rumors might
be understandable, as Wagner’s contemporaries believed him capable of almost anything—not just herculean feats of
creativity, but also impulsive acts destructive to his livelihood, his family,
and his reputation.
How, for instance, could the composer who counted on
wealthy patrons to bankroll his outsized ambitions be the same man who
cuckolded those benefactors? How could the member of the culturati who counted
Jews among his friends and supporters be the same man who wrote the notorious
1850 essay, Das Judenthum in der Musik
(Judaism in Music)—which even
Horowitz acknowledges as “egregiously anti-Semitic”?
In fact, amid constant upheaval in his life,
anti-Semitism prevailed as a leitmotif in Wagner's thought. As he aged, he edged away from the radical ideology that forced
him into exile after 1848. But, even with his late-life embrace of Christianity
and German nationalism and his exclusion of much youthful writing that now
embarrassed him, he never repudiated his poisonous racial nonsense.
Wagner was hardly the only anti-Semitic major figure
in classical music history, nor can he be held solely or even largely
responsible for the Holocaust. But his prejudice was virulent; Hitler idolized
him; and the element of bombast so present in his music made it a natural
culture lodestone for the Fuehrer.
Oscar Wilde, in his inimitable way, sent up that
last quality perhaps the best of anyone I have read: “I like Wagner’s music
better than any other music. It is so loud that one can talk the whole time
without people hearing what one says. That is a great advantage.”
Not hearing what is being said—when your laughter
dies down, just remember that this last effect of bombast is also what allowed
millions of ordinary Germans to pay no mind to Hitler when he divulged his mad
notions about conquests and scapegoats.
No comments:
Post a Comment