“Early vaccine hesitancy mostly centered on pockets of resistance to the DTP vaccine, which covers diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. The shift in focus to the MMR vaccine, which bundles measles, mumps, and rubella, got a big push in 1998, when a doctor named Andrew Wakefield published an article in the British medical journal The Lancet that hypothesized that children who received the MMR vaccine were more likely to develop autism. Its convoluted reasoning had to do with the way the viruses from the vaccine replicated in the intestine. The article was fraudulent, unethical, and wrong, and The Lancet later retracted it. Wakefield lost his medical license, but his baseless claims have had enormous staying power. With autism rates on the rise, worried parents were desperate for explanations, and Wakefield supplied an easy one.”—Pediatrician-author Adam Ratner, interviewed by Lorraine Glennon, “Dangerous Consequences,” Columbia Magazine, Winter 2024-25
The other day, scanning the profile of a friend of a
friend on Facebook, I noticed that this proponent of homeopathic medicine also
believed in something considerably more pernicious.
Memes she had posted supporting the anti-vaccination
(or, in an undoubtedly poll-tested phrase, “medical freedom”) movement were even
more numerous than those of herself and her family. I could only shake my head
over this kind of fanaticism spreading through the digital world.
I wish someone could have sent her a link to Dr. Ratner’s
interview with Columbia Magazine, though I’m afraid that, without the
slightest bit of evidence, she would dismiss him as a champion of “Big Pharma”
simply because he takes a position in direct opposition to hers.
I read the above quote from Dr. Ratner with great
interest and dismay but little surprise. At one time, Andrew Wakefield’s faulty
research would not only have been refuted, but also so decisively sidelined
that few people would read it and even fewer spread it.
Now, of course, it’s all different. Even 15 years ago,
anti-vax resistance was forming in the nascent Tea Party movement. COVID-19 turned
these diehards into protesters.
Articles in yesterday’s New York Times by Apoorva
Mandavilli and Francesca Paris, with accompanying graphs, add details to Dr.
Ratner’s contentions. This time, anti-vax skepticism has moved beyond COVID to
polio, measles, and other once-common childhood diseases that, too optimistically,
were believed to be eradicated not long ago.
“Herd immunity”—the indirect protection for a
population, achieved by vaccination rates of at least 95%--is being breached in
geographic areas ranging from large urban districts to small rural ones.
Opposition to vaccination is being fueled by legislative
efforts that soften vaccination mandates, as well as by podcasters, cable “news”
propagandists, opportunistic politicians, and social media “experts” who claim
to be “just asking questions” when they are utterly uninterested in any from
vaccination advocates who would contest flimsy evidence.
Amid the multiple and massive horrors of the 20th
century, improved public health stands out as an unqualified triumph. In contrast, vaccination doubters are
responsible for spreading too many diseases that cause unnecessary discomfort
and deaths. In this case, ignorance is anything but bliss.