After so much negative news about the impact of COVID-19 on stores, the front page of this past Sunday’s New York Times was a welcome sight with its examination of the rise of curbside pickup.
Granted, it took seven months after stores began to implement
this measure in response to fears of the pandemic before the Gray Lady gave this
topic the treatment it deserved, and there wasn’t anything to know about the
phenomenon now that couldn’t be learned then. But better late than never.
None of the contradicts my point two weeks ago that
the loss of many more physical stores continues to be a live possibility with
potential for grave damage, both to the retail real estate industry and to
their communities nationwide.
But, because of its visibility, the Times article
will shine a spotlight on a subject that other reporters on smaller papers will
want to examine for the implications for business in their cities and towns.
In one sense, Ann-Marie Alcantara’s July Wall
Street Journal piece deserves credit for getting there first. But it
was oddly silent on one crucial aspect that Sapna Maheshwari and Michael
Corkery highlighted in the Times: how curbside pickup mitigates the dilemma
of “the last mile,” the expensive final step in delivering merchandise to the
customer.
As I read these two articles, several questions that
came to mind that I hope will be addressed soon by general-interest reporters
rather than those who write for more narrow retail-focused publications:
* What merchandise is best suited to take advantage of
additional consumer impulse buying at the point of pickup?
*How will parking spaces be allocated in the future to
allow for easier customer pickup of goods?
*If more space is allotted on the sidewalk for pickup,
will this materially affect store interior space?
*If less space is devoted to retail interiors, what
will malls do with their vacant square footage, and how will this affect tenant
mix?
*To what extent will leases be modified to account for
merchandise bought online but picked up at physical locations?
Unlike, say, drive-in theaters, which have enjoyed a
minor revival since this spring, curbside pickup will likely remain an enduring
feature of the retail landscape even once COVID-19 fades as a threat. It is a
natural development of technological changes that have come into their own
after considerable tinkering over the last 20 years, as companies evolved from multi-channel
retail (enabling customers to purchase wherever they shop, but with the
physical and digital elements functioning as separate “silos”) to omni-channel
retail (seamless integration into a “phygital” experience for the
consumer).
I wish that the Times and Journal
reporters had canvassed more industry practitioners on ways to upgrade the customer
experience with curbside pickup. In this regard, Brian Donnelly, marketing
director at LivePerson, offered some suggestions, in a blog post for “Retail Customer Experience,” on how retailer can avoid leaving customers “confused
in their parking lots, struggling to engage associates to fulfill their orders”
(for example, providing “an automated way to initiate the fulfillment that
doesn't rely on the consistent availability of a store associate”).
Though retailers are understandably focused right now
on merely surviving a projected “second wave” of COVID-19 as the weather turns colder,
make no mistake: they are already looking carefully at their initial
experiments with curbside pickup as a fulfillment option. They will strive to
build on their successes and minimize their weaknesses with a measure largely
adopted out of grim necessity but now constituting a narrow but shining path
into an unknown future.
No comments:
Post a Comment