''Words are not as satisfactory as we should like them to be, but, like our neighbours, we have got to live with them and must make the best and not the worst of them.''—English novelist and critic Samuel Butler (1835-1902), Samuel Butler's Note-Books, edited by Geoffrey Keynes and Brian Hill (1952)
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
Monday, March 1, 2021
Photo of the Day: A Black Reconstruction Senator’s Residence in Washington, DC
The striking property here—2010 R Street, Northwest—might look much like any other in DC’s elegant Dupont Circle neighborhood. But the marker outside indicates another story.
When I passed by while on vacation in November 2015,
I never could have anticipated that the life and times of Blanche Kelso Bruce—born on this date in 1841—might possess even more relevance now than
it did when I read the inscription explaining why his home had been selected as
part of the African American Heritage Trail in our nation’s capital.
Bruce was one of the most striking figures in the Reconstruction Era, the post-Civil War period when freedmen sought greater economic opportunities
and achieved fleeting political equality with whites. In an era of polarization,
with racism and reaction ever-present threats to his gains and those of the base
that propelled him to prominence, he was obliged to step carefully through multiple
political minefields.
This past week, I saw a meme on Facebook questioning the
need for Black History Month. The remarkable rise of Bruce—the second African
American to serve in the U. S. Senate and the first to be elected to a full
term—and his equally astonishing fall back into relative obscurity demonstrate
that there might be more need for this collective commemoration than many
Americans would care to admit.
A runaway slave from Virginia, fathered by his white
master, Bruce made his way west of the Mississippi, where during the Civil War
he taught black children in Kansas and Missouri. After the conflict he worked
as a steamboat porter out of St. Louis, then moved down to Mississippi in hopes
of finding more opportunity. His business sense proved acute, as he turned an
abandoned cotton plantation into a thriving property over the next decade.
Large, imposing, and gifted with a strong voice, Bruce
possessed a charisma that attracted the attention of the Republican Party.
Soon he was accumulating political IOUs along with his real estate fortune,
holding simultaneous Bolivar County offices as sheriff, tax collector and superintendent
of education. With the help of Black Republicans and Gov. Adelbert Ames, Bruce
was selected by the state legislature to serve a term in the U.S. Senate.
With both blacks and whites suffering in the economic
collapse brought on by the Civil War, Bruce sought to work in the interests of
both groups and forge a biracial electoral coalition. For whites, he advocated
for internal improvements and financial incentives, including federal funding
to control flooding and the creation of a channel and levee system for parts of
the Mississippi’s edge. For blacks, he ardently promoted black servicemen,
including pressing for integration of the armed forces.
But as an “aristocrat of color,” Bruce lost some favor
with his African American base, and whites were not generally inclined toward
him to begin with, even though even the likes of fellow Mississippian Lucius Q.
C. Lamar, a former secessionist, acknowledged his intelligence and moderation.
With Democratic forces gathering strength back at home in an attempt to
suppress the African American vote, Bruce didn’t even try for a second term,
stepping down in March 1881.
After several years of continuing participation in
Mississippi politics, Bruce returned to the nation’s capital. serving as register
of the U.S. Treasury and recorder of deeds for the District of Columbia. He and
wife Josephine—the first black teacher in the Cleveland public schools and the
daughter of a prominent mixed-race dentist before she wed the Senator—remained
fixtures on the local social scene, living at their R Street property from 1890
to 1898.
Bruce’s career is a reminder of how far all Americans
can rise when they are presented with adequate opportunities to match their own
drive and ambition. It is also evidence of how those gains may be lost when powerfully
entrenched forces mobilize to exploit fears of an uncertain new political and
social environment.
Quote of the Day (Poet Richard Wilbur, Translating Moliere With Verve)
With your celestial charms before his eyes,
A man has not the power to be wise.
I know such words sound strangely, coming from me,
But I’m no angel, nor was meant to be,
And if you blame my passion, you must needs
Reproach as well the charms on which it feeds.
Your loveliness I had no sooner seen
Than you became my soul’s unrivalled queen;
If, in compassion for my soul’s distress,
You’ll stoop to comfort my unworthiness,
I’ll raise to you, in thanks for that sweet manna,
An endless hymn, an infinite hosanna.
With me, of course, there need be no anxiety,
No fear of scandal or of notoriety.”— French playwright Moliere (1622-1673), Tartuffe (1664; English translation by Richard Wilbur, 1965)
Richard Wilbur, born 100 years ago today in New York City, was as honored as a poet can get: the second poet laureate of the U.S. following Robert Penn Warren, as well as a Pulitzer and National Book Award winner. His work reflects his belief, as stated in a Paris Review interview, that “the universe is full of glorious energy, that the energy tends to take pattern and shape, and that the ultimate character of things is comely and good.”
Though it is uncharacteristic of the bulk of his work, Wilbur’s translations of Moliere, Voltaire, and Racine plays have their own unique merit, with Moliere in particular fulfilling what I usually choose in a “Quote of the Day” for the first and last days of the workweek: humor to get readers through tough hours.
I encountered Wilbur’s Tartuffe
translation in a high-school anthology, and it made me eager to watch this
comedy about a religious hypocrite when the Circle in the Square production was
aired on public television in the 1970s. The excerpt above, I think, will give
you an idea of its sprightliness, with its rhyming couplets rendering the playwright
in as close an English approximation of the joy and wit of the French original
as it may be possible to get.
Sunday, February 28, 2021
Appreciations: Neil Simon’s ‘Prisoner of Second Avenue,’ on the Suddenly Redundant Male Worker
In his heyday, Neil Simon’s niche as Broadway’s king of comedy would have been secure if only for his nearly 50 produced plays. But his extraordinary run of hits over three decades made him the most wildly successful American playwright of the post-World War II era.
Over the last quarter-century, he slipped from that
lofty perch. Attempted revivals of both his 1963 hit, Barefoot in the Park,
and his more acclaimed Brighton Beach Memoirs foundered.
Mysteriously, whether through the punishing recent economics
of mounting a straight play, the bad luck associated with individual
productions (Plaza Suite, projected as a star vehicle for real-life
couple Matthew Broderick and Sarah Jessica Parker, closed before it could open
because of the COVID-19 lockdown), or even the altered tastes of
comedy-conscious fans, this former Tony and Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright
had become the forgotten man of American theater by his death 2½ years ago.
At first glance, the best prospects for his
resuscitated reputation might lie with two of his more acclaimed later works, Lost
in Yonkers or the more autobiographical “Eugene Trilogy” (Brighton Beach
Memoirs, Biloxi Blues and Broadway Bound). But another,
further back in his career, presents a vehicle more relevant to the COVID-19
era.
The Prisoner of Second Avenue,
which premiered 50 years ago this coming November on Broadway, marked a notable
step in the evolution of the playwright. In the 1960s, while alternating
between comedies and musicals, he had stuck to a format marked by nonstop one-liners, incorporating the style he honed as a TV comedy writer for Your Show of Shows and The Phil Silvers Show.
But with a new decade came a growing seriousness,
first evidenced in The Gingerbread Lady, about an alcoholic actress. The
Prisoner of Second Avenue dug deeper into this new seriocomic vein, uniting
Simon’s keener interest in the decay he increasingly glimpsed in New York City
with the travails of a middle-aged male suddenly made redundant at the office.
Imagine a somewhat more comic Death of a Salesman, but for the
white-collar set.
The play was brought back to my attention several
months ago when I saw the 1975 film adaptation starring Jack Lemmon and
Anne Bancroft (pictured) as, respectively, advertising exec Mel Edison and his
concerned wife Edna (assuming the roles played originally on Broadway by Peter
Falk and Lee Grant).
When I viewed it on the big screen, it made
no lingering impression. Indeed, how much could a teenager always told his life was ahead of him understand an angst-ridden urban
professional suddenly aware that half his career, if not more, is over?
Mel’s dilemma registers far more forcefully now. Today,
so-called “mature workers” face similar issues: adapting to an office environment
and job market increasingly inimical to the middle-aged.
“I’m gonna be 47 years old in January,” Mel complains
in the first scene. “Forty-seven! They could get two
twenty-three-and-a-half-year-old kids for half my money.”
That fear turns out to be all too prescient. Mel ends
up unemployed, as have countless real-life counterparts in the last
half-century. Age discrimination remains common even though it had been banned
under federal law only a few years before Prisoner of Second Avenue
premiered. It may be the most blithely practiced and most persistent form of
discrimination left.
Unemployment plunges Mel headlong towards a nervous breakdown.
“I don’t know where or who I am any more,” he confesses desperately. “I’m
disappearing, Edna. I don’t need analysts, I need Lost and Found.”
Suddenly feeling superfluous, he putters around the
apartment for most of the day in his pajamas, isolated save for one dangerous
connection to the outside world: talk radio. “How many people you think listen
to the radio at ten o’clock in the morning?” he informs Edna. “Everybody is
working. But I heard it. And as sure as we’re standing here in the middle of
the room, there’s a plot going on in this country.”
When Simon wrote his comedy-drama, Rush Limbaugh and
his imitators had not yet reached nationwide audiences, but New York had its
own progenitor of right-wing talk radio with Bob Grant—unnamed here,
but, as he was already attracting local notoriety at WMCA, the probable
inspiration for the paranoid delusions to which Mel is now susceptible. Now
“open to channels of information twenty-four hours a day,” Mel is suddenly a
stronger believer in “the
social-economical-and-political-plot-to-undermine-the-working-classes-in-this-country.”
Simon foresaw the all-encompassing, even
contradictory nature of the right-wing conspiracy theories more and more common
these last three decades: “It’s not just me they’re after, Edna. They're after
you, they’re after our kids, my sisters, every one of our friends. They're
after the cops, they’re after the hippies, they’re after the government, they’re
after the anarchists, They're after women's lib, the fags, the blacks, the
whole military complex.”
“Who?” a bewildered Edna asks. “You mentioned
everybody. There's no one left.”
As loving, understanding and resilient as Edna is, she
finds it difficult not to pulled into Mel’s emotional whirlpool. In this case,
the claustrophobia of their East Side apartment becomes progressively
corrosive, as the couple begins sniping at each other.
Even Edna’s attempt to sustain them through her work only exacerbates her husband’s worthlessness as a breadwinner. The
relationship, while it guards against loneliness, also irritates because of its
by now stifling closeness. More than a few couples, I suspect, will find it an
accurate reflection of their own marital tensions.
I wonder now if Lemmon’s prior association with Simon
screenplays (The Odd Couple and The Out of Towners) might have
misled some critics as to the nature of this role. The earlier characters were
first-class neurotics, with a superabundance of internal sensors rendering them
helpless before outside stimuli.
In contrast, Mel’s distress is triggered by an outside
convulsion—the sudden loss of his job. Three plays later, Simon would create
one of the few bombs of his early career with God’s Favorite, a
retelling of the Book of Job. But The Prisoner of Second Avenue seems
like a practice run for that.
Parallel to Mel’s nervous breakdown is the one that
New York, in those pre-fiscal crisis years, was also experiencing. The signs of
outward disorder—a breakdown in services, rising crime and civic incivility—are
reflected within the Edisons’ building, as they cope with a nonfunctioning
elevator, no water, lack of air conditioning or heat, a robbery in their own apartment and obnoxious
upstairs neighbors.
In the end, Mel’s initial roar against his crumbling
universe (“If you’re a human being you reserve the right to complain, to protest”)
is exposed in all its futility. Like the more famous bearer of his surname, he must
“invent”—or, in this case, re-invent: a new form of living and acceptance of what lies outside
his control.
The Prisoner of Second Avenue has
not run on Broadway since it closed in 1973 after nearly 800 performances. To
my knowledge, its most high-profile revival since then was not
here in the U.S. but in Great Britain in 2010, in a West End production
starring Jeff Goldblum and Mercedes Ruehl,
Somehow, this very dark dramedy deserves to be seen
again. Though much of the action relies on physical interaction between Mel and
Edna that may be difficult to perform under present circumstances, I hope that
some creative director will try to reimagine it for the kind of Zoom production
that so many theater companies are attempting these days. Audiences will be surprised
at how well Neil Simon anticipated our own confinement—as well as how expertly
he made us laugh and weep over disruption and isolation.
Spiritual Quote of the Day (St. John XXIII, on Jesus and ‘The Law of Love’)
“God has engraved his law on men’s hearts; he has revealed it through Moses. It is a strict law, and sometimes it may seem a hard one. But when Jesus, the Redeemer of the world, came down to join us he explained it and made it gentler, giving it a new, fascinating and appealing character. It is the law of love, of forgiveness, of wise judgment; it is the law of forbearance, according to the various circumstances, always provided that there be no question of violating the Lord’s commandment. Therefore the true Christian, serving one master only, is on the right road and has nothing to fear.”—St. John XXIII (1881-1963), Days of Devotion: Daily Meditations From the Good Shepherd, translated by Dorothy White, edited by John P. Donnelly (1967, reprinted 1996)
Saturday, February 27, 2021
Photo of the Day: A Break From a Dreary Sky
It doesn’t sound very extreme, but throughout the morning and half this afternoon, my area of northern New Jersey was in the grip of a gray drizzle. Gradually, almost imperceptibly, the droplets from the sky ceased, and I waited impatiently for the sun.
When the sky opened at last, I made a break for it. My
restless spirit took me on a 20-minute drive to Pascack Brook County Park.
As I neared the entrance to the 79-acre park, the combination of the sun and
the snow left on the ground produced a white curtain of light rising from the
still-icebound pond.
Had the sun come out earlier, I’m sure throngs would
have lined the path encircling the pond. Still, I didn’t mind. The few walkers
who did turn out made me smile, consisting as they were of parents with very
young kids and dog owners with very small pooches. (I mean, small enough
to deposit in a handbag, had they wanted.)
Puddles were as deep as they were widespread, but no
matter: It was worth it to bolt out the door, take a drive, and come away with
this photographic memory of how I seized the day.
Quote of the Day (Tommy Lasorda, Assessing His Catcher’s Speed)
“If he raced his pregnant wife, he’d finish third.”—Los Angeles Dodgers manager and Baseball Hall of Famer Tommy Lasorda (1927-2021), on catcher Mike Scioscia, quoted in Houston Mitchell, “The Late Tommy Lasorda Was Known As Much for His Quotes As for His Managerial Acumen,” Los Angeles Times, Jan. 8, 2021
I was going to use another quote from the late Dodger
legend—one of those classic locker-room inspirational mottoes. But as soon as I
saw this one—well, let’s just say I knew I had spotted a winner!
(The image accompanying this post, showing the retired
Lasorda in his honorary capacity as spring training manager, was taken March
12, 2010, by Djh57.)