“A state that finds itself tempted by self-interest to erode traditional norms may in time regret its conduct."— American politician, diplomat and social scientist Daniel Patrick Moynihan (1927-2003), On the Law of Nations (1990)
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
Monday, January 5, 2026
Quote of the Day (William F. Buckley, on a Past CIA Operation)
“A dozen years ago someone remarked that the weekend’s attempted assassination of Sukarno had all the earmarks of a CIA operation: Everyone in the room was killed except Sukarno.”— Political commentator, editor, and conservative public intellectual William F. Buckley (1925-2008), “On the Right,” Danville Register (Va.), Dec. 23, 1972
Well, this weekend’s removal of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was more successful than that failed (and officially
denied) hit on the Cold War Indonesian President. The story has it
that the Central Intelligence Agency had been tracking Maduro’s activities since
August.
But I doubt that we will find out soon
whether the CIA under current head John Ratcliffe made any mistakes in this or
any other activities since the beginning of Trump 2. In a larger sense, questions
are already rising about even the wisdom of such covert operations as this one.
A warning to this effect was raised by none other than
current Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. Within 24 hours of
President Trump’s announcement of Maduro’s removal, people with memories longer
than the 24-hour-news cycle were circulating Gabbard’s 2019 warning about such an operation:
“Venezuela poses no threat to the United States,”
Gabbard, then a Democrat, said in a video. “Congress has not authorized the
United States to go to war in Venezuela, and there’s no justification for our
country to violate the sovereignty of the Venezuelan people.”
Thursday, May 8, 2008
This Day in Diplomatic History (Nixon’s Disastrous Latin American “Goodwill” Tour)
Nixon would have preferred to stay home, where he could talk the administration into cutting taxes—then, as now, an electoral vote-getter, and something particularly important for the Vice-President as he looked to succeed Eisenhower as President by winning the GOP nomination and subsequent election in 1960. But Eisenhower had picked up on Franklin Roosevelt’s use of his second VP, Henry Wallace, in sending his subordinates abroad. Nixon had already journeyed to Argentina, Africa, and, in 1953, a 38,000-mile trip through Asia. The swing through Latin America was expected to be similarly uneventful.
Nobody at home expected the wave of anti-American protests that began when Nixon, on a platform at San Marcos University in Lima, was pelted by rocks and eggs and shouts of “Go Home, Nixon!” Calling the protestors “cowards,” he cut short his address, moving on to Catholic University, where the atmosphere was not much warmer but he at least didn’t have to contend with farm produce and projectiles.
Five days later, in Caracas, Venezuela, the tour turned positively violent. A hostile mob surrounded his car, pelting it with rocks and shouting “Death to Nixon!” Later, he and wife Pat would be spit upon by the crowds.
A worried Eisenhower dispatched a naval squadron in case his VP needed to be taken out of Venezuela for his own safety, but Nixon managed to leave quietly. The rest of the tour was ended.
Whatever its impact in Latin America, the demonstrations against Nixon only produced a wave of sympathy for him in the U.S.—something not easy to do, given the numerous enemies he had already created in this country. (Adlai Stevenson, for instance, referred to the red-baiting VP as “McCarthy with a white collar.”) Viewed as a representative of his country, the Vice-President was hailed for his courage. He came out of the encounter with his political prestige enhanced.

