Even before the premiere of the first “chapter” (when was this phrase ever associated with a movie?), the film was being reviewed not for its plot, acting, or direction, but for its budget—or, more specifically, Costner’s budget.
A director friend of mine insists that its rumored
expenditure has been distorted—it’s amortized over the four films projected
rather than this first one. But whatever the correct amount (I’ve seen ranges
from $38 million to $100 million), it was evidently enough that Costner felt
compelled to sell one of his properties to help finance the series.
Speaking of “series,” Costner’s involvement in Horizon
ended up being so intense and protracted that he decided to forego appearing on
the last season of his long-running TV show, Yellowstone.
All of this is beside the point. Costner’s money is
his to spend and no concern of yours or mine. To the extent it matters at all,
it is whether the box office for the first installment in this “American Saga”
allows the remaining ones to be seen first in theaters (Costner’s preference)
or to be streamed at home.
Ah—that’s the rub.
Though Costner might have looked to John Ford, Howard
Hawks, and Anthony Mann for guidance on how to fill a magnificent Western
landscape, he seems to have gravitated more towards the multi-character,
multi-plot P.T. Anderson 1999 movie Magnolia—only not in that film’s
three-hour running time, but over the three remaining in his series, too.
The ideal audience for this kind of project—patient,
willing to follow characters over time—is not sitting in a theater, but in
front of a suitably large home theater projection screen. Maybe that’s why “Chapter
1” did not perform up to expectations, leading the second part to be delayed
past its August 16 premiere date.
Evidently, Costner’s production company, Territory
Pictures and Horizon's distribution partner New Line Cinema, hope to
grow the audience for the second installment through widespread exposure in the
next few weeks, including on PVOD and Max.
Perhaps more than any star today, Costner has found the western a congenial genre. Silverado provided him with the first signature onscreen time, and Dances With Wolves briefly made him the king of Hollywood, with Oscars for Best Director and Best Picture.
Wyatt
Earp and Open Range continued his fascination with this form as old
as Hollywood itself. And, when his career hit a trough a decade ago, it was a
small-screen modern western, Yellowstone, that thrust him back squarely
into the forefront of Hollywood again.
It took the actor 35 years—even before he started work
on Dances With Wolves—to begin bringing this new sprawling work to the
screen. With Horizon, Costner and co-screenwriter Jon Baird want to tell
a story unlike any the actor has tried before.
Promotional men, farmers, gunslingers, soldiers,
gamblers, prostitutes, and Native Americans all contest a narrow space along Arizona’s
San Pedro River Valley, starting in 1859, a couple of years before the Civil
War. In a sense, this convergence of different groups on the frontier represented
the first American “clash of civilizations.”
The plot contains so many threads that Costner himself
doesn’t appear onscreen, as grizzled horse trader Hayes Ellison, until nearly
an hour goes by. Worse, so many characters are introduced before being quickly
shuffled off to the next segment that keeping them all straight becomes
confusing at times. Viewers may find themselves wishing for longer glimpses of
the more recognizable other actors (e.g., Sienna Miller, Luke Wilson, Michael
Rooker) in the large cast.
However much money Costner poured into the movie, viewers get their money’s worth.
Shot mostly in Utah, the vistas—low-angle
shots of the sky, open plains and mountain ranges—are as sweeping as anything
in John Ford’s Monument Valley oaters. Some sequences—including 45 minutes of a
family withstanding an Apache attack—are breathlessly tense.
Theodore Roosevelt, an advocate of continental
expansion, titled his history of the western movement The Winning of the West.
But in this first installment of Costner’s saga, few viewers will regard
anybody in this struggle “winning.”
Far from being “wide open spaces,” this land was
already occupied, and entailed the displacement of those already there and the
shock and alienation of those who, in oncoming, unstoppable waves, moved in.
Native Americans, of course, lost their lands. But
settlers lost family members in every conceivable situation (natural disasters,
Indian attacks, homesteader-cattle baron conflicts); soldiers saw too much
corruption and violence to hold onto their innocence about government’s good
intentions; and even opportunists and bullies learned not to trust their good
fortune for very long.
As the Baird-Costner screenplay makes plain, debate
and division even within each side often further complicated this struggle for
the American interior.
In extended dialogue rendered in subtitles, young
Native American warriors angry at white seizure of their lands burn with indignation as tribal elders warn of the dangers of massive retaliation.
On the other hand, soldiers trying desperately to keep a tentative peace bemoan
the continuing wagon trains that make this well-nigh impossible.
Chapters 1 and 2 of Horizon will premiere in
early September at the Venice International Film Festival. I hope industry
observers who have written off this ambitious saga will use the opportunity to
see it on the big screen to rethink any urge to call it “Kevin’s Gate.”
Whatever its flaws in marketing and execution, Horizon
is an honorable attempt to tell the true story of the American West in all its
complexity, with skill and love. If it doesn’t find its audience in 2024, it
surely will in years to come, if given the chance.
No comments:
Post a Comment