October 7, 1932—When readers saw Save Me the Waltz in bookstores, many undoubtedly recalled author Zelda Fitzgerald as the glamorous,
free-spirited wife of the man who christened the now-lost “Jazz Age,” F. Scott Fitzgerald. Only intimates of
the couple would have known that Zelda had written her debut novel while
institutionalized; that fiction writing was her latest, desperate creative
attempt to carve an identity outside that of her husband; and that the
circumstances surrounding publication had further strained a marriage already
resembling a train wreck.
Zelda’s nervous breakdown in Paris in 1930 had ended her aspirations to become a ballerina. In the two years since,
even as her condition appeared more fragile, she took up painting, then
writing, as therapy. Scott’s ambivalence about all this—a determination to take
care of someone he loved, denial of how his drinking had warped the dynamics of
their relationship, a competitive streak over who was the more creative
person, and some good old-fashioned sexism—resulted in a furious reaction to
her fiction.
Part of Scott’s frustrations over his wife’s novel
stemmed from his extreme difficulties in producing a work covering essentially
the same time period and setting: the Riviera in the 1920s. It had been seven
years since The Great Gatsby, as he
was stymied by a host of problems: the need to handle Zelda’s psychiatric care,
his own deteriorating health (including hospitalizations resulting from alcoholism),and
the urgency required to crank out one endless short story after another to pay for all of
this as well as daughter Scottie’s education.
But a factor that can’t be ruled out was his
hypercritical internal apparatus. Fitzgerald was given to telling all and
sundry (including Thomas Wolfe, who rightly regarded it as a criticism of himself) of the
need to shape a novel, to be a self-conscious craftsman in the mold of such masters as
Henry James and Gustave Flaubert.
That mindset can lead to a masterpiece such as Gatsby, but also to the
creative paralysis satirized expertly in the 1987 comedy Throw Momma From the Train, in which writing instructor Billy
Crystal can’t get beyond an opening sentence: “The night was hot,” “The night
was damp,” and, perhaps the capper, “The night was dry, yet it was raining.”
Then one day, Danny DeVito—not exactly a stellar student--submits a composition
with this opener: “The night was humid.” It seems at once uncannily derivative
and, because its author has gone further than his teacher, mocking. “Class
dismissed,” Crystal announces. “I have an enormous headache in my eye.”
The “enormous headache” experienced by Scott
Fitzgerald derived, at least initially, from a similar situation: Zelda, with
time on her hands at Phipps Clinic in Baltimore, encouragement from her current
psychiatrist (the first female one she had had), and a decade of pent-up
feelings from marriage, actually completed her manuscript—in three months—a fraction of the nine years it would eventually
take her husband to finish Tender Is the Night. But even more issues angered Scott to no end:
·
*The
chief male character of her novel was called Amory Blaine—the name of the
protagonist of what was then Scott’s best-known novel, This
Side of Paradise (1920). The only way
that Zelda could have made clearer that this was her husband was to call him
Scott Fitzgerald.
·
*Aspects
of this male character resembled Scott. Between this factor
and the one just above, he understandably feared that he would become the laughingstock
of the literary world.
·
*Zelda
had sent the manuscript to Scott’s editor at Scribners, Maxwell Perkins,
without telling her husband beforehand. Though Zelda had had
earlier pieces published, this project came as a surprise to Scott.
Informed by her psychiatrist that her husband was livid over this, Zelda
protested that she hadn’t wanted to distract him when he was still struggling
over his novel. Scott didn’t buy it, though.
·
*Zelda
had appropriated images, themes and concepts from Scott’s still-aborning
manuscript. She had “poached” his manuscript, he claimed. This
wouldn’t do at all. It wasn’t only that he was the family breadwinner, but that
he was really the truly professional writer in the family, he claimed.
On this last point, Zelda—tagged with a condition
(schizophrenia) that, according to biographer Sally Cline, might have been a
misdiagnosis—could only mutely disagree, given her dire circumstances. Since Nancy Milford’s groundbreaking
1970 biography Zelda, however, a
number of scholars (such as Cline and Linda Wagner-Martin) have taken up her
cause more vigorously than she ever could. They point to Scott’s hypocrisy
about “poaching” (he had quoted passages from Zelda's letters and diaries for a
decade in his fiction). This penchant was so rampant that, in a mock newspaper review of The Beautiful and Damned, Zelda had
noted ironically: “Mr. Fitzgerald — I believe that is how he spells his name —
seems to believe that plagiarism begins at home.”
With Zelda’s psychiatrist, in effect, mediating
their dispute, Scott agreed to publication of the novel, on several conditions:
1) “Amory Blaine” had to be named something less obvious; 2) certain scenes—especially
involving drinking—needed to be removed; and 3) Perkins, the editor
they now shared, should not encourage her about the prospects of commercial
success or critical acclaim.
The contract executed between the Fitzgeralds and
Perkins stipulated that any profits from the book should be applied to
alleviate Scott’s debt to Scribners. Yet the novel sold so poorly—only about 1,400
copies—that the clause never needed to be invoked.
The novel also came in for some brutal treatment
from critics, who seized on Zelda's lapses into purple prose (e.g., “A shooting
star, ectoplasmic arrow, sped through the nebular hypothesis like a wanton
hummingbird. From Venus to Mars to Neptune it trailed the ghost of
comprehension, illuminating far horizons over the pale battlefields of reality.”)
Ironically, one critic for the Saturday Review of Literature dismissed as implausible perhaps the
most heavily autobiographical element of the novel: “the desperation which
prompts Alabama [Zelda’s fictional alter ego] to turn to ballet-dancing with a
group of dingy, impoverished people in Paris.”
Critics today are more charitable, pointing to Zelda’s originality and sometimes startling use of language. But Save Me the Waltz (Zelda came up with the title from a record-company catalog) only succeeded in her lifetime in exacerbating tensions between husband and wife.
Seven months after its publication, the two sat down
for a joint session at the clinic. The resulting 114-page transcription of
their exchange contains some of the most extraordinarily sensitive and painful material
ever laid before readers concerning a literary couple. They argued about her
out-of-control behavior, Scott’s drinking, the costs of Zelda’s care, their
respective marital roles, and even their suspicions about the other’s sexual
orientation. Scott often sounds at his worst here: belittling her achievements
and even capabilities while championing his own. Though Zelda would be checked out of institutions from time to time through the rest of her life, she and Scott would not live together after 1934. Given the intense feelings that surfaced in the counseling session, that might have been just as well for both.
In assessing the Fitzgeralds’ marriage, several
facts need to be weighed. The couple
acted in staggeringly erratic ways that made living with each other impossible.
Yet, through it all, they continued to lean on each other, either for material
support (Zelda) or as an intellectual sounding board or moral support (Scott).
In the end, afflicted with overwhelming physical and
mental deficits, the two often stumbled, but just as often came back. Scott
sought to pay for her treatment and their daughter’s education until he
suffered his fatal heart attack in December 1940. As for Zelda, she continued
not only to paint but—surprisingly, given her painful experiences on her single
published novel—to write. She wrote a satirical play, Scandalabra, that did not find a Broadway backer, and after Scott’s
death she worked intermittently on another novel, Caesar’s Ghosts—a project interrupted for good by her death in a
fire in her last institution, in Asheville, N.C., in 1948.
No comments:
Post a Comment