Showing posts with label Tabloids. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tabloids. Show all posts

Sunday, December 31, 2023

Flashback, December 1973: Murdoch Gains American Toehold With San Antonio Paper Acquisition

Completing a $19.7 million purchase of the morning San Antonio Express and afternoon San Antonio News from Harte-Hanks Newspapers Inc., Rupert Murdoch was able to secure his first American properties 50 years ago this month.

The purchase launched the Australian on a course that made him the most formidable media baron of the 20th and 21st centuries, with properties around the world, a perch from which he finally stepped down a few months ago at age 92.

At age 21, Murdoch inherited a single afternoon Australian tabloid from his father, the foundation of what became News Corp. In 1969, having bought a string of papers in his own country, he turned to the British market when he bought the weekly News of the World and the daily London Sun.  

With his San Antonio acquisitions, he planned to import the same formula that had made him a success on Fleet Street, what I would call “3C X S”: i.e., crime, controversy, and cheesecake times scandal.

More specifically, it meant in his papers screaming headlines, faux anti-elitism, and manufactured outrage—and, in the newsroom, ousters of key managers and staffers as well as broken promises about editorial independence.

Murdoch entered the American market just as the Watergate scandal was slowly but steadily eroding support for Richard Nixon. Disdain for Tricky Dick’s opponents was as much a part of the publisher’s DNA as scorn for journalistic objectivity or ethical newsgathering methods. (“The American press might get their pleasure in successfully crucifying Nixon,” he said, “but the last laugh could be on them. See how they like it when the Commies take over the West.” He could never imagine a world in which both Nixon and “the Commies” would be gone.)

Given that Murdoch was far more enthusiastic about Nixon than he has been in private about Donald Trump, I think it highly probable that Nixon could have survived his growing scandals if he had Murdoch’s backing when the publisher’s American holdings reached their eventual peak.

Even as he was getting ready to invade San Antonio, he was seeking a wider arena for his outsized ambitions. He would have those in just a couple of years, launching The National Star (later, renamed simply The Star) as a supermarket tabloid competitor of The National Enquirer in February 1974 and transforming the faded liberal daily The New York Post into a rabid right-wing publication after his acquisition in 1976.

Nevertheless, it is one of the ironies of the past half-century, when daily newspapers withered successively under the assault of the evening news, 24-hour cable stations, and the Internet, Murdoch remained one of the most enthusiastic supporters or print against electronic journalism. 

(The newspaper portion of his empire might be considerably slimmed down, if his successor, son Lachlan Murdoch—notably less enthusiastic about the old medium—has his way, according to this September 2023 AP article by Pan Pylas and Jill Lawless.)

Though the Murdoch empire has, with more than a little truth, been credited with creating the conditions for Trumpism, the denial of climate science may be the most lasting and pernicious legacy of the publisher’s.

Had Murdoch’s influence merely extended to America, he would just bear responsibility for the rise of a homegrown demagogue. But because he is invested in six continents, he has been able to undermine climate-science advocates and erode diplomatic and legislative efforts to curb the greatest existential threat of our time.

It took two screenwriters, Herman Mankiewicz and Orson Welles, to depict in fictional terms one of the early “yellow journalists”: William Randolph Hearst, in “Citizen Kane.”

In contrast, Murdoch was translated into fiction by the novelist Edward St Aubyn, in Dunbar, a 2017 retelling of King Lear, and Jesse Armstrong and his team of writers for the recently concluded series Succession.

Compared with other newspapers that he kept alive despite constant losses (notably, The New York Post, which only recorded its first annual profit in modern history this past year), San Antonio’s News and Express fell by the wayside relatively quickly in the Murdoch stable of newspapers.

After bamboozling readers for a decade with headlines like “Ax Attacker Kills Sleeper,” “Armies of Insects Marching on S.A.,” and “Uncle Tortures Tots with Hot Fork,” Murdoch began to hedge his bets with the two papers he’d bought, closing the News in favor of a reconstituted Express-News in 1984, then selling that to his longtime rival in the San Antonio market, the Hearst Corp.

Now, it was America, not just San Antonio, that he was looking to conquer. In the end, it would involve telling people what they most wanted to hear, even if his private views were far different.

To satisfy the legal requirement that only American citizens could own U.S. TV stations, Murdoch became a naturalized citizen in September 1985. Still, there is reason to wonder if he has anything other than contempt for the great mass of his adopted countrymen—or if he feels any sensitivity at all to those less fortunate than him.

In Michael Wolff’s recent book about the Murdochs and their empire, The Fall, Rupert is quoted taking a swipe at both his Fox evening anchor, Sean Hannity, and, implicitly, in the most insulting manner possible, many in the latter’s audience: “He’s retarded, like most Americans.”

In word and action, Murdoch might be the best example of what columnist H.L. Mencken meant nearly a century ago in concluding, “No one in this world, so far as I know...has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people."

Thursday, December 20, 2018

Quote of the Day (Mary McGrory, on DC and Trump, Nearly 3 Decades Ago)


“The defense budget is the closest we come to the sums being talked of in the divorce settlement between Ivana and Donald….We in the capital are into greed, of course, and we do a lot of lying…. Viewing Wall Street, watching the Trumps, Washington thinks of itself as wholesome.”— Political columnist Mary McGrory (1918-2004), “What Cards Those Trumps Are,” Washington Post, Feb. 18, 1990, reprinted in The Best of Mary McGrory: A Half-Century of Washington Commentary, edited by Phil Gailey (2006)

Twenty-five years ago today, Donald Trump wed Marla Maples, the Southern blonde who broke up his marriage to his first wife, Ivana, another blonde. (The latter would not be the last check--oops, I mean Czech--he would bounce.) The celebration, befitting someone of his ego and love of wretched excess, took place in New York’s Plaza Hotel.

Mary McGrory, the Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist of the Washington Post, could never have imagined that the randy real estate tycoon who diverted D.C. from weightier matters would one day obsess the capital—let alone that he would be in charge of the defense budget, and everything else related to national security. 

But, long before he was the Twitter King, Trump was the next best thing for the media: the Tabloid King. At the height of the love-triangle craze involving him, Ivana and Marla, New York area residents were exposed to a near-daily barrage of headlines from the New York Post about their tussles in the sack and the court: “Don Juan,” “Best Sex I’ve Ever Had” (which, that paper’s editor later crowed, was libel-proof because what would Trump say—he wasn’t the best sex Maples ever had?), “Safe Sex” (about a brief separation agreement between Donald and Ivana allowing them to date partners), and “Unsafe Sex” (the collapse of said agreement).

The Donald so reveled in his “Don Juan” image that he even tried to get Playboy magazine to run a "Girls of Trump" spread featuring his employees, according to an early biographer, journalist Wayne Barrett.

Trump has been tabloid executives’ delight for so long, in fact, that suspicions were bound to arise about why The National Enquirer has treated him with kid gloves for so long. The supermarket-aisle fixture, after all, made hay over John Edwards' rumored liaison, correctly surmising that readers would be offended at the prospect of a candidate fooling around behind the back of a wife who had been stricken with cancer. 

Now, we know that the Enquirer’s owner, American Media Inc. head David Pecker, a longtime friend of The Donald, bought the silence of adult film actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, then quashed their stories so they couldn’t damage Trump in the 2016 Presidential election.

Fooling around on one's pregnant wife--the circumstances that existed regarding Donald and Melania over a decade ago--is not, to my way of thinking, a significant improvement over pulling the wood over a wife who's dealt with cancer. But the recent situational ethics of GOP voters invites the same type of excited discovery that Europeans must have felt 150 years ago in pursuing the source of the Nile.

Nearly three decades ago, as McGrory observed, Trump’s greed and lying were already on such a colossal scale that they made Capitol Hill grandees feel virtuous by comparison. These days, on the GOP side, no such assurance exists. 

Terrified as much by the President’s tweets as being “primaried” by far-right wingnuts even before facing a Democratic opponent in the fall, they have either cooed about what a great President he’s been or maintained a skittish silence. 

Now comes the reckoning for their complicity. The capital was astonished by the spectacle of greed and lying swirling around the Clintons in the 1990s, but in its constant movement, the Trumps exceed even that tawdry tabloid standard. 

But we’re now learning the consequences of it all: routine violations of the Constitution’s “emoluments” clause, manipulation of the press to invent scandals about opponents while hiding real ones about the President, and a Russian leader with a background in the KGB who knew these secrets—and, perhaps, far more than we can ever imagine right now.

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

Tabloid Headline of the Day (The New York Post, With Exactly What You Knew Was Coming)



“HUMA CUTS OFF WEINER”—New York Post front-page headline, August 30, 2016

Earlier today, a phone call came in to a certain former New York congressman and mayoral candidate, who is getting through Part 3 of a scandal of his own making: “Mr. Weiner? My name’s John Wayne Bobbitt. I just want to tell you that I know EXACTLY how you feel…Hello?...Hello?”