Showing posts with label GODFATHER. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GODFATHER. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2022

Flashback, March 1972: Brilliant Brando Briefly Revived in ‘The Godfather’

The Godfather, released 50 years ago this month in the U.S., did more than just update the gangster film genre of the Great Depression, introduce a host of memorable movie catchphrases, and lift the profiles of rising actors such as Al Pacino, Robert Duvall and James Caan.

No, the top-grossing film of 1972 and winner of the Best Picture Oscar for that year also marked a return to brilliance, however brief, of the most influential actor of the postwar period: Marlon Brando.

The recent death of William Hurt, with a decade of glory in the 1980s, reminded me more than a little of Brando: another performer with a string of Oscar nominations and one statuette in a concentrated period; another character actor whose unexpected success as a leading man made him uncomfortable; and another conflicted personality whose youthful idiosyncrasies and self-indulgence reduced the quality of the projects he was given in middle age.

Hurt’s late-career Best Supporting Actor nomination as a crime boss in A History of Violence called to mind, albeit fleetingly, his great string of performances in The Big Chill, Kiss of the Spider Woman, Children of a Lesser God, and Broadcast News. But it came in a film that he did not anchor and that never became a landmark in cultural history.

In contrast, Brando’s turn as Mafia chieftain Vito Corleone did all of that.

Moreover, the character couldn’t be more different from the roles that made him a legend in the 1950s: brutal, animalistic Stanley Kowalski in A Streetcar Named Desire; rebellious gang leader Johnny Strabler in The Wild One; and the anguished washed-up boxer turned informant Terry Malloy in On the Waterfront.  

As marvelous as he was in those films, his time onscreen in The Godfather represented a master class in cinematic character creation—as well as one of the most remarkable comebacks a leading man has ever made back to relevance.

What Brando himself called 10 “dank, dismal” films made over the prior decade had given him more than a reputation for high maintenance: they had also rendered him box-office poison. 

His defiance of convention (e.g., reading cue cards placed discreetly off camera rather than memorizing lines), once tolerated if not celebrated, was now simply abominated.

Virtually none of the executives at Paramount Pictures wanted Brando as Mafia patriarch Vito Corleone, including the late producer Robert Evans. 

(I almost burst out laughing when, at Sunday night’s Oscars, director Francis Ford Coppola thanked Evans. You would never have known how much they clashed about virtually everything during the movie’s production.)

After butting heads with studio bosses over his lone directing gig, the 1961 western One-Eyed Jacks, and being blamed for the costly bomb Mutiny on the Bounty, Brando had largely lost interest in movies. Some of his projects (e.g., The Ugly American) stemmed from his well-intentioned idealism; others (e.g., Reflections in a Golden Eye), from a belief that directors like John Huston and Arthur Penn could create compelling films. None had really worked out.

In considering an adaptation of Mario Puzo’s bestselling potboiler in 1970, Hollywood execs wanted someone, anyone, else besides Brando to play Vito: Laurence Olivier, Ernest Borgnine, Richard Conte, Anthony Quinn, Carlo Ponti, even comedian-TV producer Danny Thomas. 

Maybe only two people with responsibility for how the character would be created saw Brando as ideal for the part: Puzo and Coppola, then looking to make the leap from highly regarded screenwriter (Patton) to director in his own right.

The very thought of Thomas—who, through his own long-running comedy series (Make Room for Daddy) and others he had produced for others (e.g., The Andy Griffith Show), had enough capital to buy a controlling interest in Paramount and enjoy a clear path to the role—was enough to rouse Puzo to action.

Writing from a fat farm where he had gone to shed weight, Puzo wrote a letter urging Brando to take on the role: “I think you’re the only actor who can play the Godfather with that quiet force and irony (the book is an ironical comment on American society) the part requires.”

At first, Brando dismissed the idea. But a deep look at the script roused him from his torpor by convincing him that it was not strictly about the Mafia so much as “the corporate mind.”

Or, as he elaborated to journalist Shana Alexander for a Life Magazine cover story: “The Mafia is so American! To me, a key phrase in the story is that whenever they wanted to kill somebody it was always a matter of policy. Before pulling the trigger, they told him, ‘Just business, nothing personal.’ When I read that, [Vietnam War architects Robert] McNamara, [Lyndon] Johnson, and [Dean] Rusk flashed before my eyes.”

Although this realization informed his general consciousness of the story’s larger meaning, the genius of his characterization lay in the thousands of details he used to bring it to life, in these ways:

*Physical transformation: The appearance of Vito Corleone evolved during what Coppola told the actor was a “makeup test” but which was, instead, a de factor audition for the benefit of doubting Paramount heads. Coppola had a cameraman on hand to record how Brando, a blonde in his late 40s from the Midwest, turned himself into an Italian two decades older: pulling his hair back, applying shoe polish, and then, to effect the look of what he called a “bulldog,” stuffing his cheeks with Kleenex. (During the actual filming, he used a mouthpiece made by a dentist--and, to solidify this impression of an older man, he would walk around with weights around his stomach and in his shoes.)

*Voice: Two decades after Brando made an indelible impression on American culture with the primal yell “STELLA!!!” in A Streetcar Named Desire, he did the same by lowering his voice to barely above a whisper in The Godfather. He did so because of his conviction that this is how Vito, previously shot in the throat, would sound now. Moreover, he had been struck by the raspy voice of mob boss Frank Costello in the 1951 Kefauver hearings. “Powerful people don’t need to shout,” Brando realized. This mumbling forced those who interacted with The Don—as well as the audience—to lean forward to pay closer attention.

*Improvisation: Sometimes Brando would work with a prop supplied by Coppola, such as a stray cat that the director found on the set (and which the actor then held throughout a scene). Once, it was a spontaneous decision, an outgrowth of the needs of the scene and Brando’s frustration with another actor: a slap across the face of Al Martino, playing the Sinatra-like singer Johnny Fontaine. “Martino didn’t know whether to laugh or cry,” remembered Caan. The most ingenious improvisation, though, occurred during Vito’s death scene, a sequence that studio executives initially scorned as unnecessary. Coppola was struggling with how to believably depict the sickly, elderly mob boss playing with his grandson.  As the director later told Playboy: "[Brando] said, 'Here's how I play with kids,' and took an orange peel, cut it into pieces that looked like fangs and slipped them into his mouth." “Of course!” Coppola continued. “The godfather dies as a monster!" But that wasn’t the only reason the scene suddenly became effective. Stylistically, it formed part of a leitmotif with the earlier scene when oranges roll on the street after Vito is shot. (The bright colors formed an ironic contrast with the doom represented by the action). Furthermore, this death scene, surreptitiously and hastily filmed to avoid the prying eyes of visiting studio personnel, had become so memorable that they couldn’t dream of cutting it.

*Interacting with cast members: In an interview with Parade Magazine to commemorate the movie’s 50th anniversary, Talia Shire, who played daughter Connie Corleone, praised Brando’s “tremendous elegance”: “Look at the way he dances with me in that wedding scene. But what I found was that he was also incredibly charismatic, generous and disciplined. He really wanted you to be great in a scene.” The rest of the cast, already awestruck just to be in the same movie as this seminal influence on postwar screen acting, bonded with him from the start of the production during dinner at an Italian restaurant in Manhattan.

*Trusting his director: Many of Brando’s problems with the movies of the prior decade had been caused by disillusion and even disgust with individual directors. But from the beginning, he had placed his faith in Coppola, a novice behind the camera, and he had not been disappointed. Coppola’s extensive pre-production rehearsals with actors, for instance, reminded him of a similar method used by Elia Kazan, who had guided him to Oscar-nominated performances in Streetcar, Viva Zapata!, and On the Waterfront, according to William J. Mann’s biography of Brando, The Contender. In the end, Brando’s confidence in Coppola saved the film and arguably altered the course of the director’s career after studio execs, disgruntled with the movie’s early rushes, contemplated replacing Coppola with Kazan. Hearing the news, Brando threatened to quit—a major risk for someone whose troublesome reputation had rendered him persona non grata in the Hollywood. It is impossible to imagine another director, lacking Coppola’s feel for the Italian-American milieu of the story, conjuring up similar cinematic magic.

The dominant actor of his era, Brando also dominated The Godfather; though present in less than 40% of its screen time, he consistently remained the focus of its attention. At least partly in recognition of that fact, he won an Oscar for the role. 

Yet Brando couldn’t help but display his contempt for the industry once again, as he asked actress Sacheen Littlefeather to appear at the ceremony to reject the award on his behalf as a protest against Hollywood’s stereotypical portrayals of Native Americans.

Brando had one more performance that drew on all his emotional resources, as a haunted widower in the sexually explicit Last Tango in Paris. But director Bernardo Bertolucci's demands were too much for his psyche, and he would never invest so much of his energy in roles thereafter.

Even after the shock and tumult created by his films has faded, Brando remains a complicated, even controversial, figure for his off-screen life. (Actress Rita Moreno, who attempted suicide in frustration with his cheating during their eight-year relationship, told fellow Oscar winner Jessica Chastain that he was “a bad guy when it came to women.”)

But the mysterious power of his best work onscreen endures as well. In particular, The Godfather has inspired two generations of actors, and even evoked tributes of another kind: parody. 

Disguising himself as The Godfather in The Revenge of the Pink Panther, Peter Sellers’ Inspector Clouseau accidentally swallows a cotton ball he’s stuffed in his mouth, and Brando himself sent up his character in the 1990 comedy The Freshman.

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Quote of the Day (Ron Rosenbaum, on Al Pacino’s Godfather)



“Pacino’s Michael Corleone embodies perhaps better than any other character the bitter unraveling of the American dream in the postwar 20th century—heroism and idealism succumbing to the corrupt and murderous undercurrent of bad blood and bad money. Watching it again, the first two parts anyway, it feels almost biblical: each scene virtually carved in stone, a celluloid Sistine Chapel painted with a brush dipped in blood.”—Ron Rosenbaum, “Passion Play: Al Pacino Gets Ready for the Next Act in His High-Wire Career—Bringing Live Theater to the Movie Screen,” Smithsonian, September 2013

I had this quote, waiting to be used for the last year—then forgot to include it for my post yesterday about The Godfather: Part II. But this brief but perfect commentary, by one of my favorite nonfiction writers on one of the essential postwar American films, is way too good to waste.

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Movie Quote of the Day (‘The Godfather,’ on Family)


Michael Corleone (played by Al Pacino): “When Johnny [Fontane] was first starting out, he was signed to a personal services contract with this big-band leader. And as his career got better and better, he wanted to get out of it. But the band leader wouldn't let him. Now, Johnny is my father's godson. So my father went to see this bandleader and offered him $10,000 to let Johnny go, but the bandleader said no. So the next day, my father went back, only this time with Luca Brasi. Within an hour, he had a signed release for a certified check of $1000.”
Kay Adams (played by Diane Keaton): “How did he do that?” 
Michael:  “My father made him an offer he couldn't refuse.” 
Kay: “What was that?” 
Michael:  “Luca Brasi held a gun to his head, and my father assured him that either his brains or his signature would be on the contract....That's a true story.” [Cut to Johnny singing again for about 10 more seconds before going back to Michael] "That's my family, Kay, that's not me.”—The Godfather (1972), adapted from the novel by Mario Puzo, screenplay by Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola, directed by Coppola

For an adaptation of a shameless potboiler, The Godfather—which premiered on this date 40 years ago—yielded a screenplay as notable for its memorable lines as for its sturdy structure. Today’s quote illustrates both. 

I didn’t select these lines because of the line in the middle about “an offer he couldn’t refuse,” nor because of the thinly veiled anecdote about how the Mafia induced recalcitrant jazzman Tommy Dorsey to release lead singer Frank Sinatra from his contract so he could pursue a solo career. No, it’s the last line, about family, that intrigued me.

In 1972, a protracted, dishonest foreign war that had lost any real purpose was winding toward a conclusion in keeping with the way it was conducted, and the reelection campaign of an American President was authorizing dirty tricks in a race he was unlikely to lose. In that atmosphere, the Puzo-Coppola screenplay would resonate with its insights into business, crime, power, and even the American Dream. (Kay: "Do you know how naive you sound, Michael? Presidents and senators don't have men killed." Michael: "Oh. Who's being naive, Kay?")

But it might have been in its perception of the American Family that the film cut most deeply.
In a post for the Koldcast blog, “How The Godfather Trilogy Changed the Face of the Crime Family,” Dan Berry took a now-standard view that the saga paid “homage to the traditional romanticized idea of the noble gangster as a ‘man of honor’ – one who acts outside the law but with an exemplary devotion to both the biological family as well as the crime family.” Some of this longstanding belief was propagated by Puzo himself, who once said he had presented "a highly romanticized myth" about the Mafia, as he had never met a gangster before he wrote his novel.

On the contrary, I don’t think that Coppola and Puzo romanticized the story of Vito Corleone anymore than the sagas of King David and King Lear were. In all three cases, the sins of a powerful man were visited upon him multiple times over in the divisions and deaths among his children.

If parents bask in the good fortune of their children, then Vito Corleone could only groan about how his turned out:

·        *  Connie is abused by her husband, who will pay for his sins—not merely physical mistreatment but betrayal of a family member to enemies—with his life;
·      *   Sonny’s hair-trigger temper makes him so unwary that he steps into a trap that leads to his blood-splattered end;
·        *  Fredo is a weakling chafing at his sidelined status within the family; and
·        *  Michael—the smart one that everyone hoped would lead the family to respectability—becomes a coldly calculating capo who orchestrates multiple hits that occur as he stands at the baptism of his wife’s child, where he hears the traditional Catholic ritual language about renouncing Satan and his works. 


     The film is, in fact, an ironic reversal of the opening scene of Connie's wedding to Carlo. Michael will eventually not only order Carlo's murder in retaliation for betraying Sonny, but also will advise the older, weakling Fredo, working for Vegas casino owner Moe Greene, never to side with outsiders against the family.


     The full import of Michael's transformation--in theological terms, his fall from grace--becomes underscored in a brilliant scene commissioned from screenwriter (and ace script "doctor") Robert Towne when Coppola sensed there was still something missing from the film. What Towne supplied works perfectly, not only in providing a plot hinge but also in yielding character insights and underscoring a principal theme of the film. Vito, increasingly relinquishing control of family operations following the attempt on his life that thrust Michael into the family business, now sits with his youngest son in the family patio, warning him about another crime family. 


     Vito: "So Barzini will move against you first. He'll set up a meeting with someone that you absolutely trust... guaranteeing your safety. And at that meeting, you'll be assassinated." (as the Don drinks from a glass of wine as Michael watches him) "... I like to drink wine more than I used to. Anyway, I'm drinking more..."

Michael: "It's good for you, Pop."

Vito: "I dunno. Your wife and children. Are you happy with them?"

Michael: "Very happy..."

Vito:  "That's good. I hope you don't mind the way I...I keep going over this Barzini business..."

Michael: "No, not at all..."

Vito:  "It's an old habit. I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless, but not men. How's your boy?"

Michael: "He's good."

Vito: "You know he looks more like you every day."

Michael: "He's smarter than I am. Three years old, he can read the funny papers."

Vito: (laughs) "Read the funny papers. Oh...well... eh, I want you to arrange to have a telephone man check all the calls that go in and out of here because..."

Michael: "I did it already, Pop."

Vito: "Ya know, cuz it could be anyone..."

Michael: "Pop, I took care of that."

Vito: "Oh, that's right. I forgot."

Michael: (reaching over, touching his father) "What's the matter? What's bothering you?" (after the Don doesn't answer) "I'll handle it. I told you I can handle it, I'll handle it."

Vito: (as he stands) "I knew that Santino was going to have to go through all this. And Fredo...well... Fredo was...well…. But I never...I never wanted this for you. I work my whole life - I don't apologize, to take care of my family. And I refused to be a fool dancing on a string held by all those - big shots. I don't apologize; that's my life. But I thought that...when it was your time that - that you would be the one to hold the strings. Senator Corleone. Governor Corleone, or something...This wasn't enough time, Michael, it wasn't enough time."

Michael: "We'll get there, Pop. We’ll get there."

Vito: (after kissing Michael on the cheek) "Now listen. Whoever comes to you with this Barzini meeting – he's the traitor. Don't forget that."

The admonition that begins and ends this long scene can be seen in another way besides the running of Murder Inc.: an aging, weakened parent's attempt to pass along the secrets of the family business--or, more benignly, the wisdom accumulated from a lifetime.

But sandwiched in the middle of this is Vito's half-strangled cry of pain. "What's bothering" Vito? A life of suspicion and violence is not what he had hoped for this son with the most impeccable credentials: a college education, an enviable war record, a beautiful fiancee. This son could have ascended to heights that the father, fighting to make his way forward in a country that maligned his ethnic group, could never achieve. Its lack of fulfillment leaves a regret that won't go away, any more than the loss of Sonny will.

You could imagine Joe Kennedy nodding his head in agreement with Vito's sentiments--just as you can imagine the political patriarch's similar anguish over the dark fates coming to his children.