Showing posts with label Dan Morgenstern. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dan Morgenstern. Show all posts

Monday, July 17, 2017

Quote of the Day (Dan Morgenstern, on John Coltrane’s Continuing Inspiration)



“[John] Coltrane — and especially the Coltrane of Giant Steps — continues to inspire countless budding saxophonists and players of other instruments as well. His sound, once so harshly criticized and even branded ugly, has become part and parcel of the sound of jazz, and his extensions of the possibilities of his instruments have been absorbed into the working vocabulary of the music, though some of the things he could do with a horn remain out of reach.”— Dan Morgenstern, Living with Jazz: A Reader (2004)

Saxophonist John Coltrane died at age 40 of liver cancer in Huntington, NY, on this day in 1967. If jazz might be said to have a Summa Theologica, it might be Coltrane’s A Love Supreme, his classic 1965 album on the glory of God. This gentle, introspective spirit had great reason to be thankful for God, as—having lost high-profile jobs with Duke Ellington and Miles Davis in the 1950s because of his heroin addiction—he had finally managed to pull himself together and get clean.

His spiritual journey was matched by his ceaseless musical experimentation as a sideman and, after 1960, a bandleader and composer in his own right. His layered “sheets of sound” technique has been described in many ways over the years, but perhaps never so memorably as by Coltrane himself: “I start in the middle of a sentence and move both directions at once.”

In 1995, Coltrane was honored by the United States Postal Service with a commemorative postage stamp. In 2007, the Pulitzer Prize Board awarded him a posthumous Special Citation for his “masterful improvisation, supreme musicianship and iconic centrality to the history of jazz.”

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Quote of the Day (Dan Morgenstern, on Sarah Vaughan)



“While the voice has lost nothing, Sarah Vaughan the improvising musician has grown in stature. She always had an exceptional ear, and this enabled her to become the first (and perhaps the only) singer who could utilize the harmonic subtleties introduced to the jazz language by Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie—not so coincidentally among her first fans and boosters. In terms of rhythm, she was able to keep up with the innovations in jazz as well. But in her earlier days, her playfulness sometimes interfered with the sense and intention of the songs. No such dangers now—she has become a great interpreter of great songs as well as a great singer, and she has accomplished this without giving up her sense of humor, which remains as delightful and unpredictable (and girlish) as ever.”— Dan Morgenstern, Living with Jazz: A Reader, edited by Sheldon Meyer (2004)

The quote above comes from a 1981 Morgenstern review. By this time, the voice and style of Sarah Vaughan—born in Newark, NJ, 90 years ago today—had changed, partly because of her smoking (which would result in her death by lung cancer in 1990) and partly because of song interpretations that had grown more baroque with age.

If you want to experience how the voice of this divine jazz singer could change over time, just compare her treatment of two standards: Howard Dietz and Arthur Schwartz’s “Dancing in the Dark,” a 1956 song of hers from Mercury Records, and Stephen Sondheim’s “Send in the Clowns,” a staple of her concerts in the 1980s. “Dancing in the Dark” is lighter, airier, practically ready to take wing; three decades later, with “Send in the Clowns,” her tones felt darker, heavier, lingering over phrases, stretching syllables.

One might also compare Vaughan with Joni Mitchell, another singer whose voice became altered by smoking. Mitchell’s had coarsened in a way that Vaughan’s did not, even well into her 60s. The interpretations of both women, however, became supercharged with experience. (See, for instance, what Mitchell did with “Both Sides Now” in her 1969 version from the Clouds LP, then in 2000 from her CD also named Both Sides Now.)

One aspect of Vaughan, however, as noted by Morgenstern, did not alter with time: the irrepressible sense of humor that led to her nickname, happily alliterative and light: “Sassy.”

(The image accompanying this post is an August 1946 photograph of Sarah Vaughan at Café Society in New York, from the William P. Gottlieb Collection of the Library of Congress.)

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Quote of the Day (Clive James, on Benny Goodman, Jazz and Race)


“A man like Benny Goodman, for example, can’t possibly be fitted into a schematic history that would base itself on the white exploitation of a black invention. He carried within himself the only answer to the conflict, and, as things have turned out, he presaged the outcome: a measure of tolerance and mutual respect, and at least a step toward a colour-blind creative world. Being white, he was able to translate his prodigious talent into economic power: the very power to which black musicians, however successful, were always denied access. But Goodman used his power to break the race barrier. Though his mixed small groups existed mainly in the recording studios and rarely on stage—the Carnegie Hall appearance with Count Basie was strictly an interlude—the music they made was the emblem of a political future, and in the aesthetic present it was a revelation.” --Clive James, Cultural Amnesia: Necessary Memories From History and the Arts (2007)

All hail Benny Goodman, the “King of Swing,” born 100 years ago today in Chicago, one of 12 siblings in a dirt-poor Russian emigrant family.

The Clive James quote above refers to Goodman’s integration of jazz, what is often called America’s unique contribution to culture—a full decade before Branch Rickey did the same thing for America’s pastime by hiring Jackie Robinson. The big-band leader had already recorded with the African-American pianist Teddy Wilson as part of a trio (along with regular Goodman drummer Gene Krupa; the three are pictured in the image accompanying this post) when he was convinced by Helen Oakley, a young jazz writer, to have the small group play in concert.

The chemistry on that Easter Sunday in 1936 was perfect—“The three of us,” Goodman recalled, “worked together as if were had been born to play that way”—and the audience in the Urban Room of Chicago’s Congress Hotel clapped and roared approvingly. The later addition of virtuouso vibraphonist Lionel Hampton made it a quartet.

At this point, it becomes necessary to interject with what, to his contemporaries in the music world, was the obvious: Goodman was a driven, excellence-demanding professional entertainer, but not a saint. In a PBS “American Masters” documentary on his life broadcast some years ago, his daughter remembered how, brusquely, even brutally, he had discouraged her from a career as a musician by saying point-blank that she had no talent.

Gary Giddins’ “The Mirror of Swing” essay in the great anthology Reading Jazz, while celebrating his musical achievements, also depicted an ironic juxtaposition: a galaxy of jazzmen, gathered together for a tribute in Goodman’s honor, yet overwhelmingly carping about his “legendary cheapness, absentmindedness, mandarin discipline, rudeness to musicians, and various eccentricities.”

That’s not the end of it, by any means. Dan Morgenstern’s essay in Living With Jazz: A Reader puts the matter within a larger framework by quoting another musician, Mel Powell, that Goodman was “one of the very, very few white people I’ve known who had not a single fiber of racism in him. He was absolutely, authentically color-blind….One of the real giveaways to his outlook was that he could be as rude to a black man as to a white man. He did not get patronizing or suddenly gentle. Not at all. And I always found that admirable.”

Longtime devotees of professional football will recognize the same attitude in a man four years Goodman’s junior, Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi. “He treats us all alike,” one of his players supposedly said, “like dogs.”

Scions of immigrant families, the two men also burned to succeed, driving themselves perhaps more mercilessly than anyone else. Professional triumph came at something of a price in both cases. Goodman, as we’ve seen, was more admired than loved, while Lombardi’s ferocious, inward-turning anxiety probably fed the cancer that killed him at age 57.

Two last aspects of the James quote are left for me to remark on. The first is race. James was reacting to several critics and musicians who have downgraded Goodman in comparison with black musicians and band leaders. This seems to me churlish. Just as it is inconceivable to deny the central African-American contribution to jazz, it is also impossible to deny Goodman’s part in the story. He excelled on the clarinet in the jazz, pop and classical realms—something that few other musicians of any race could match.

Second, though the occasion for this post is Goodman’s birth, I’d like to close by going full-circle: to his death. His daughter, hurt as she was by her father’s thoughtlessness, could also only marvel at his perseverance in the face of cancer, making sure to practice every day, no matter how awful he felt. Goodman died, in fact, rehearsing for a Mostly Mozart festival in June 1986.

Fans of the jazz legend might want to listen to WKCR, the radio station of my alma mater, Columbia University, as they air, through June, a tribute to Goodman in celebration of his centennial.