Jan. 1, 1919—J.D. Salinger, a star-struck youngster who became a literary Garbo by walking
away from his career at the height of his fame and acclaim, was born in
Manhattan in comfortable circumstances that made him uncomfortable—not unlike
his most indelible character, the troubled teenager Holden Caulfield.
Even that name of the protagonist of The Catcher in the Rye reflects
Salinger’s fascination with actors: It’s a mashup of two he particularly
admired, William Holden and Joan Caulfield. Holden’s older brother is a
Hollywood screenwriter, a profession that, for all its glamour, fills the
alienated teen with uneasiness.
Over the years, many readers have mourned the fact
that The Catcher in the Rye has never
been adapted for the screen. A major reason for that might have been the botch
that producer Samuel Goldwyn, together with screenwriting brothers Philip and
Julius Epstein, made of Salinger’s short story “Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut.”
That bitter satire of WASP suburbia was turned into the Susan Hayward weepie My Foolish Heart, which gave rise to an
Academy Award-winning song—and widespread critical derision.
Salinger was so embarrassed to be associated with
this travesty of his work that he almost automatically refused other
opportunities to adapt his work. I say “almost” because Salinger, a mass of
contradictions, did, for whatever reason, allow agent H.N. Swanson to make one
exception to the rule: marketing the short story “The Laughing Man.” (Producer
Jerry Wald rejected the overture, unsuccessfully urging Swanson to convince Salinger
to let him make a film of—you guessed it—The
Catcher in the Rye.)
As protective of his intellectual property as Holden
Caulfield was of innocent children, Salinger might also have feared how the
censorship regime that held sway in Hollywood from 1930 to 1967 might have
bowdlerized or twisted his depiction of sexual exploitation in the novel. (The
restrictive “Production Code” of the
time was adamant about its exclusion: “Sex perversion or any inference to it is
forbidden.”)
As noted in Dan Grossman’s perceptive piece in the online magazine The Millions, hints of this theme appear early on, in Holden’s
fear for the safety of one of his crushes, Jane Gallagher, at the hands of her
alcoholic stepfather and Holden’s prep-school tormentor, Stradlater. It
culminates in Holden fleeing the apartment of the only adult authority he
trusts, Mr. Antolini, because of his suspicion that the English teacher is
trying to seduce him.
When I read the novel as a high-school freshman, it
was possible, given Holden’s status as a not-always-reliable narrator and the
implications of his psychiatric treatment at the end of the book, to see this
incident as ambiguous. But the flood of child sexual-abuse incidents that have
been reported in prep schools and, of course, the Roman Catholic Church makes
such a reading untenable now—a fact reinforced for me after reading Caitlin Flanagan’s connection of that scene to the scandal that erupted at New York’s Horace Mann School in The Atlantic three years ago.
The details provided force the conclusion that Mr.
Antolini is a cunning sexual predator—one who latches onto the product of a
troubled or broken family and carefully “grooms” him to win his trust. When
Holden awakens to find Mr. Antolini staring at and caressing his body, the teacher
claims that Holden is imagining such a transgression, calling him a “strange
boy.”
The abundant examples of Antolini’s prior kindness,
however, are enough to make Holden wonder, as he spends the night helplessly
alone in Grand Central, if the pat on the head represented affection instead of
perversion. “The more I thought about it,” he tells us, “the more depressed and
screwed up about it I got.”
Influenced by movies, Salinger in turn would
influence generations of American filmmakers. Echoes of The Catcher in the Rye, with its loose conversational lingo, its
scorn for adult “phonies” and its sympathy for adolescents feeling misplaced,
can be found in The Royal Tenenbaums, The
Graduate, Ordinary People, Less Than Zero, Tadpole, The Ice Storm, and Igby Goes Down.
Rangy and handsome—“like a candlestick, a Giacometti
statue,” according to one admirer —with a warm, funny presence, Salinger might
have become an actor himself if his passion and commitment to writing had not
proven so all-consuming. At summer camp as a child, he had performed in at least
four plays and was voted the most popular actor by counselors and fellow
campers. His son Matthew would please his father considerably by becoming an
actor.
Among the celebrities drawn into his orbit as an
adult were Eugene O’Neill’s daughter Oona, a beautiful teenage debutante (who
would break the writer’s heart by wedding Charlie Chaplin instead) and actress
Elaine Joyce (more than a quarter-century his junior when they dated in the
early 1980s).
After his last story in The New Yorker, “Hapworth 16, 1924,” was published in 1965, it
became common to refer to Salinger as “reclusive.” But his attitude might have
been more akin to Greta Garbo, who complained that rather than wanting to “be
alone,” as normally reported, she had actually said she wanted to be “left alone.”
Someone who worked every day like Salinger could not
have helped but notice how one of his heroes, Ernest Hemingway, distracted by his monstrous celebrity and the image he had created, had seen his
productivity and art decline.
Ironically, Salinger’s decision to step away from
the publicity machine had only made him more
famous, as the World’s Most Famous Reclusive Author.
The movies created
characters from him. At least the makers of Finding
Forrester came up with a different surname.
But W.P. Kinsella even used his
actual name for the character sought by Ray Kinsella in the novel Shoeless Joe. (In a sense, this was art
mirroring art: Salinger had created a character named Ray Kinsella in his story
“A Young Girl In 1941 With No Waist At All.”) When the novel was turned into
the film Field of Dreams, changes in
the character’s name (to “Terence Mann”) and race (to African-American, to
facilitate adding James Earl Jones to the cast) still did not fool viewers
about who was really being referred
to.
After Salinger’s death in 2010, it was announced
that several books on which he had worked in his decades-long withdrawal from
publishing would be issued between 2015 and 2020. But no word has been released
since then on any publication timetable.
(A tip of my
hat to my college friend Greg, who first suggested that I write about Salinger
after the writer’s death in 2010. It took a long time, but I finally got around
to it, my friend. Thanks!)
No comments:
Post a Comment