Movie Quote of the Day (‘Mr. Deeds Goes to Town,’ on a Source of Opera Funding)

[Longfellow Deeds, suddenly inheriting $20 million from his uncle, finds himself besieged by the opera board of directors.]

Longfellow Deeds [played by Gary Cooper]: “Gee, I'm busy. Do the opera people always come here for their meetings?”

Cornelius Cobb [played by Lionel Stander]: “Uu-hum.”

Deeds: “That's funny. Why is that?”

Cobb: “Why do mice go where there's cheese?”—Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936), screenplay by Robert Riskin and Clarence Budington Kelland, directed by Frank Capra

In the last few weeks, at least as far as the Metropolitan Opera is concerned, the cheese moved. The agreement that the Met announced last fall for the Saudi Arabian government to provide more than $800 million over eight years came unraveled, just one more casualty of the Iranian War and the resulting Strait of Hormuz standoff.

What will the Met do now? Even looking to a misogynistic, authoritarian Mideast regime to keep it afloat was…a stretch. Now, the longtime cultural institution might be hearing more variants on this sharp rejoinder from Mr. Deeds: “I personally wouldn't care to be the head of a business that kept losing money! That wouldn't be common sense.”

Quote of the Day (Anne Applebaum, on How Kleptocracies Spread From Russia)

“Since the 1990s, the kleptocratic model created in Russia has spread much further. From Angola to Zimbabwe, dictators with access to hidden sources of wealth are better able to resist demands for political change. They can hide their families and their property abroad. They can finance bribery and influence operations. The aura of secrecy they build is also part of what keeps them in power. Ordinary Russians, ordinary Chinese or ordinary Venezuelans are not allowed to know why their rulers, and their rulers’ friends and their families, are billionaires, because they’re not meant to have any influence or understanding or knowledge of politics at all. That lack of knowledge creates a sense of helplessness, apathy, even despair.”— Pulitzer-prize winning American historian Anne Applebaum, “Follow the Money,” The Financial Times, Aug. 31-Sept. 1, 2024

With Donald Trump’s election to a second term, the United States has officially joined—or, I should say, rejoined—the ranks of the dubious global fraternity of kleptocracies—i.e., governments with leaders who seek personal gain and status at the expense of those they govern.

In an interview last month with Jeffrey Rosen at the National Constitutional Center, Applebaum not only discussed how the kleptocratic model exemplified by Vladimir Putin (pictured) operates in autocracies across the world, but also how it figures in the case of Trump, whose “primary concern at all times is himself and his own finances and his own power.”

Even while President, Applebaum notes, the autocrat-curious politico maintained the practice he’d begun in his days as a New York real estate mogul of selling condos in Trump-branded or Trump-owned buildings to anonymous people, whose intentions—including whether they were out to bribe or influence White House officials—were unknown.

The potential for conflicts of interest was clear, a situation only worsened by how Trump flouted prior Presidential procedures for blind trusts. Though ostensibly turning over management of the Trump Organization to his two eldest sons after becoming President in 2017, he still received updates on the family-owned trust and remained its chief beneficiary.

Just as the Former and Future Guy made a farce of the notion of a “blind trust,” the Supreme Court did so with the belief that justice is blind. 

In a preview of its extraordinary deference in this past session in granting Trump broad immunity from prosecution for “official acts,” the Roberts Court dismissed in 2021 two cases involving his violations of the Constitution’s “emoluments clauses” for preventing Presidential corruption. (See Ciara Torres-Spelliscy’s excellent summary from that time for the Brennan Center for Justice.)

I have taken particular interest in Trump’s use of the U.S. government as a virtual slot machine for the Trump Organization because one instance of it occurred not far from my family’s ancestral homeland in County Clare, Ireland.

In September 2019, taxpayers footed a $15,000 bill for Secret Service lodging for Vice President Mike Pence’s trip to Ireland. The lucky beneficiary of this largesse? Trump’s Doonbeg resort, which he had already spent $41 million to buy, renovate and operate without returning a profit to that point. 

It was all part of a pattern in which Trump made $82 million from his three properties in Ireland and Scotland through often convoluted and unnecessary travel itineraries and exorbitant tacked-on charges, according to Rebecca Jacobs’ June 2023 report for the ethics watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

Even while in office, the Trump Organizations maintained ethically and legally questionable investments involving Trump International Hotel, New York’s Trump World Tower, Dubai’s Trump International Golf Club, trademarks in China, and royalties from The Apprentice and its spinoffs in multiple countries.

Then, while Trump planned his return to power, son-in-law Jared Kushner, while publicly withdrawing from campaign appearances, secured a $2 billion investment from a Saudi Arabian fund led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as well as $157.5 million in management fees from foreign investors for work expected to be completed in 2024.

Let’s stop for a second on that last item. Mohammed bin Salman—you may remember him as “MBS,” the shadowy potentate credibly charged with ordering the October 2018 assassination of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Is it necessary to spell out the obvious implications of the Kushner deal for diplomacy and influence peddling?

The naturalist writer Frank Norris titled his 1901 novel of corruption by a massive railroad conglomerate The Octopus. With the resounding victory of MAGA forces this week, American voters have given carte blanche to the Trump Octopus.

Presidents' financial misdeeds are not as easy to understand as their infidelities, but they are more important to know if we hope to grasp how the long-term interests of the American people can be subverted. 

Despite Trump’s war against the group he calls “the enemy of the people,” the press owes it to the republic to continue and even amplify its reporting on the President-elect’s festering corruption—and Americans in turn owe it to themselves to pay attention and act accordingly.

Quote of the Day (Donna Abu-Nasr, on Pickup Moves By Saudi Arabian Men)

“Often, while I was stuck in traffic, young men would slam Post-its or papers with their mobile phone numbers scribbled on them on the window of my car. That was one way to pick up women. Another was to go to the mall and throw the little slips of paper at the feet of women covered head to toe in black.”— Donna Abu-Nasr, Bloomberg’s Saudi Arabia bureau chief, “An Orange Bra in Riyadh,” in Our Women on the Ground:Essays by Arab Women Reporting from the Arab World, edited by Zahra Hankir (2019)

Trump: The Sultan of Stamina????

Just how beleaguered might White House staffers be feeling these days? Bad enough that Donald Trump is facing a special prosecutor, that he basically admitted to firing James Comey over “the Russia thing” after aides had sworn up and down only 24 hours before that it was all about the FBI director’s handling of the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation, or that he’d shared classified information with the Russian ambassador within a day of that firing.

But now, aides have scrambled to explain why Trump had gone from slamming "Islamist extremism"— perpetrated by political movements that implement Islamic law and theology—to "Islamic extremism," a slap at millions of adherents to one of the world’s oldest religions that prior Presidents studiously avoided.

It was entirely understandable, they said. The President was “just an exhausted guy" following his 14-hour journey from Washington, a senior White House official said on a CNN report.

You could practically hear the massive groans from Trump supporters. First, their standard-bearer had been photographed bowing to a Saudi prince—the type of act that Barack Hussein Obama might do. Now, he was sucking wind during his very first time on the diplomatic track—what they’d been to conditioned to expect from Hillary Clinton, a.k.a. Lady Macbeth, Killary, and the Lady Who Got Sick at the 9/11 Memorial Service Because She Had Parkinson's.

Someone I know—not a Trump admirer—said to me not long ago, “I’ve got to hand it to him—he has some energy for someone his age! Hillary would never be able to keep up that pace.”

I don’t care for Mrs. Clinton’s Becky Sharp instincts, but I’ve been kicking myself since this conversation that I didn’t dispute this statement more vigorously at the time. Not only is she far more likely to pore over briefing books than The Donald, but as Secretary of State she maintained a punishing schedule: 956,733 miles, 112 countries and 401 days spent traveling in four years, reports the Washington Post.

Contrast that with Trump. Even when traveling inside the U.S., he has been reluctant to stay in non-Trump accommodations that stint on his preferred creature comforts. When it came time to venture abroad for the first time, the President reportedly strongly urged his aides to shorten the trip from nine days to five, according to a New York Times account.

He was right to be concerned. Trump had only made it to his first stop—only his second day abroad, mind you!—when his staff already was offering the exhaustion excuse. All of this from a man who, as a candidate nearly a year and a half ago, tweeted: “Hillary Clinton doesn't have the strength or stamina to be president. Jeb Bush is a low energy individual, but Hillary is not much better!”

Why slime one opponent when you can slime two?

Mrs. Clinton might not be svelte, but her exercise and yoga regimen compare favorably with her victorious opponent, who discounts the value of jogging (and who, almost certainly, hasn’t meditated for 30 seconds in his life). He is lucky to wear a bright cap when he golfs, as it distracts momentarily from his bulging waistline and prominent rear end when he swings a club, as evidenced in the 

accompanying photo.

The touch of an attractive woman has been known to practically turbocharge some politicians. (See, for instance, the late Sen. Strom Thurmond, who appeared mummy-like when making political appearances in his 90s—until, that is, he’d be introduced to a young lady.) 

In the past, that might have applied to Trump. But his luck on this first foreign trip has been considered so abominable that even this didn’t work for him. In their first day as President and First Lady abroad, as he reached out for Melania’s hand, she yanked it away--two days in a row!.

Babe Ruth might have been the Sultan of Swat, but Trump, despite his trip to an Arab country, will not be named the Sultan of Stamina anytime soon. If you want to know the truth, though, I care less about the shape Trump’s in than in the shape he’s going to leave the Presidency and country in when he goes—not a moment too soon.