Showing posts with label N.C. Wyeth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label N.C. Wyeth. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Quote of the Day (N.C. Wyeth, on ‘Practical’ and ‘Artistic’ Ideals)

Practical ideals and artistic ideals are as foreign to each other as black is to white. They are of equal value (in their proper places) in their relations to life and living. But if a boy is naturally gifted with the ‘artistic ideal,’ be it in either art, music or writing, he should be guided into it, placed into its atmosphere unhampered by too much practicality; the latter will come from necessity."—American illustrator and painter N.C. Wyeth (1882-1945), letter to his father, Andrew Newell Wyeth II, July 30, 1906, in The Wyeths: Letters of N.C. Wyeth, 1901-1945, Second Edition, edited by Betsy James Wyeth (2008)

Wyeth, the patriarch of a great family of painters, knew all too well the tug between practical and artistic ideals. 

As I discussed in this prior post about his death, he was afflicted towards the end of his life with “melancholy and self-doubt over an inability to be taken seriously as a producer of fine paintings rather than of popular commercial art”—illustrations he created for classics by Robert Louis Stevenson, James Fenimore Cooper, and Jules Verne for which he is still best known.

In some way, many artists, writers, and musicians who’ve achieved popularity have struggled with the same aspiration for higher achievement that Wyeth did.

(The image accompanying this post is a self-portrait of Wyeth.)

Sunday, June 25, 2023

Spiritual Quote of the Day (1 Samuel, on How God Made Himself Known to the Prophet)

“At that time Samuel was not familiar with the LORD, because the LORD had not revealed anything to him as yet. The LORD called Samuel again, for the third time. Getting up and going to [the priest] Eli, he said, ‘Here I am.  You called me.’ Then Eli understood that the LORD was calling the youth. So he said to Samuel, ‘Go to sleep, and if you are called, reply, Speak, LORD, for your servant is listening.’ When Samuel went to sleep in his place, the LORD came and revealed his presence, calling out as before, ‘Samuel, Samuel!’ Samuel answered, ‘Speak, for your servant is listening.’ Samuel grew up, and the LORD was with him, not permitting any word of his to be without effect.” — 1 Samuel 3:8-10, 19 (New American Bible)

Like so many of the stories in the Bible, this one exerts a mysterious but powerful hold on my imagination. Like Samuel, many of us, for the longest time, go through life unsure when and how we are being called by God, and for what purpose. But the task remains for us to remain open to His call—to let God know that we are listening.

It is Samuel’s marvelous power that God would not “any word of his…be without effect.” That is the gift all writers wish for, in their way.

The image accompanying this post, “Samuel Mistakes God's Call” (depicting Samuel approaching Eli), was created by the great Pennsylvania painter and illustrator N.C. Wyeth (1882-1945)—not only an extraordinarily vivid artist himself, but also father and grandfather of others with similar gifts: Andrew and Jamie, respectively.

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

This Day in Art History (Birth of Andrew Wyeth, Brandywine Painting Prince)



July 12, 1917—Andrew Wyeth, a member of an artistic dynasty who received popular attention for his own distinctive portraits and rural landscapes drawn from the Brandywine River Valley and Maine, was born in Chadds Ford, Penn.

Andrew’s father, N.C. Wyeth, became famous for his vivid illustrations of adventure tales by Stevenson, Defoe, Cooper and Verne. His son, Jamie Wyeth, created more abstract work in his early years, though one venture into the realistic style, a portrait of President John F. Kennedy, gained much notice for him while the artist was still only a teenager, and served notice of the eventual mode he would adopt. Even two of Andrew’s sisters, Henriette and Carolyn, became artists, at a time when that was more unusual than it is now.

For people who don’t follow art closely, Andrew may be best known for reasons associated more with scandal than with achievement. I’m speaking of his “Helga” paintings, a series of renderings (frequently nudes) of neighbor Helga Testorf that were created in secret, with not even Andrew’s wife-business manager Betsy aware of them for a long time. (Or so the story went. See my prior post on the background of this controversy.)

In this and other instances, Andrew’s imagination fed on unconventional sources. One of these, I learned from a visit to his studio, was film. At age eight, he became fascinated by director King Vidor’s The Big Parade (1925), and would go on to see the antiwar silent masterpiece 200 times. He would even consider it his strongest single visual influence.

Helga was not the only neighbor that Wyeth caught on canvass. The paraplegic Christina Olson, who lived on a Maine farm near Wyeth, became the subject of Christina's World (1948, pictured), which shows her crawling in a field below her house. Created with egg tempera and, with the model’s face away from the viewer’s gaze, it is suffused with mystery and has become one of the central holdings of New York’s Museum of Modern Art.

For years, Wyeth was hardly a darling of critics. They regarded his realistic style as unoriginal and out of step with the avant-garde movement; aside from the “Helga” cache of paintings, they saw little of the notorious or transgressive in his work; and those of a bohemian bent regarded Andrew's known votes for Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan appalling.

More recently, however, the critical pendulum has swung toward Wyeth, wrote Daniel Grant in a Huffington Post piece in March. The qualities that the public perceived—meticulous attention to detail, compositional balance, and subdued tones that make the viewer curious about this world—have finally become more apparent to the critical establishment.

Above all, the artist’s intense identification with his subjects can no longer be derided as merely sentimental. “Know it spiritually,” N.C. advised his son on how to approach a subject. “Be a part of it.”

Andrew learned his lesson well.

Sunday, August 21, 2016

Flashback, August 1986: Secret Wyeth ‘Helga’ Paintings Cause Sensation



Andrew Wyeth was already a highly regarded painter, part of a multi-generational artistic dynasty, when he became the art world’s answer to Bruce Springsteen by landing on the covers of Time and Newsweek in the same week in August 1986. But this level of fame came less because of his skill than the whiff of scandal associated with a secret cache of paintings unknown to his wife.

In a blogpost from three years ago, I called the Brandywine River Museum of Art, in Chadds Ford, Pa., “perhaps the best regional art museum I’ve come across.” One major reason for this was its association with Wyeth and his family. Andrew’s father, N.C., became famous for vivid illustrations for Robert Louis Stevenson and Jules Verne classics that enthralled me as a child. Son Jamie has made his own mark over the years, including a painting of a thoughtful, grave President Kennedy.

Unlike many of his contemporary painters who created abstract works, Andrew Wyeth seldom left viewers puzzled at what they were seeing. But that didn’t mean he didn’t make them wonder what was behind it. That was particularly the case with his 246 studies, drawings, and paintings of neighbor Helga Testorf.

The 15 years in which Helga posed, the intense amount of time even a single sitting might take (sometimes up to eight hours), and the intimate of the paintings—including a number of full-frontal nudes—would have been enough to make the work notorious. But what sealed the deal was the one-word description of their subject matter by Wyeth’s wife and business manager, Betsy: “Love.”
Betsy, the New York Times reported, did not know of the paintings’ existence until 1985, when Wyeth, fearing he might be dying of influenza, told her about them.

Not everyone accepted the history of the paintings presented by the Wyeths. One dissenter was Robert Hughes, chief art critic of Time. “I expressed skepticism about it,” he recalled two decades later about his conversation with his bosses at Time. “It all seemed a little too good to be quite true, and the romance with the blonde struck me as distinctly unlikely. And since it had long been a well-known fact that Betsy Wyeth was her husband’s business manager, the notion of a quarter of a thousand objects squirreled away from her eyes over one-third of their matrimonial life together seemed even less likely.”

Neither Hughes nor his counterpart as chief art critic at Newsweek wrote their magazines’ cover stories on the find. Consequently, the stories played up the scandal seemingly beneath the surface, with words like “secret” and “obsession” on the covers, rather than putting the work within the context of the artist’s broader career.

I found particularly interesting in this whole curious incident the role played by a secondary character, Leonard Andrews, the initial buyer of the paintings. Andrews owned 25 newsletters. (My favorite title: Swine Flu Claim and Litigation Reporter.) Wyeth, grateful for the Texan’s promise to keep the collection intact, awarded him reproduction rights in return for $6 million.

Wasting no time in drumming up interest in the collection, Andrews sent out press releases and, with scandal whetting publishers’ interest, signed a book deal that became a bonanza when 400,000 copies were sold. A touring exhibition of seven American galleries, including the National Gallery of Art, exposed the collection to a million visitors.

In 1989, Andrews sold the paintings to an unidentified Japanese collector, for somewhere between $40 million and $60 million. Altogether, the Texas publisher was believed to have reaped an estimated three-year profit on this cache of art of more than 600%, according to Los Angeles Times critic Christopher Knight.

Given these circumstances, were Hughes’ suspicions correct about a nonexistent scandal used to hype the paintings and drive up their sales price? In favor of that notion were the following:

*It would have been enormously difficult for Wyeth to hide the paintings’ existence from Betsy because of the amount of time he is supposed to have spent with Helga;

*At least one person not involved with the Wyeth or Testorf families had seen at least one of these works: Nancy Hoving, wife of the head of the Metropolitan Museum of Art at the time;

*The Brandywine River Museum acknowledged that it knew of the paintings’ existence before it was revealed to the world and, in fact, had already displayed some from time to time;

* Wyeth’s sister, Carolyn, dismissed the speculation of an affair between her brother and his subject as “a bunch of crap.”

“What do you do with the girl next door?” novelist John Updike wrote in his review of the Wyeth show. That may be the operative question in this whole hullabaloo. In one sense, it may not have mattered whether or not the Wyeths were complicit in drumming up publicity for these paintings. What did matter was that life changed fundamentally for “the girl next door,” Helga.

In an interview with Monty Python member Michael Palin for the BBC program Michael Palin in Wyeth’s World that was broadcast over a year ago, Helga said Wyeth had promised that the paintings would not be displayed until after his death (which did not occur until 2009, 38 years after she first posed for him). Her answer as to why he broke his pledge was cryptic but suggestive: “I think he was caught in something to let it come out. It was his promise, but Mother Nature had other plans.”

While one rumor had it that a certain chill entered the relationship between Andrew and Betsy after the revelation of the paintings, what was indisputable was that, at least for a time, Helga became collateral damage. Constant press inquiries forced this neighbor to flee from this area of rural Pennsylvania where she had long lived.

It was all part of a larger cycle of paradoxical emotional fragility and nurturing for Helga, a native of Prussia who, as a child, had been imprisoned in Denmark with her family at the end of WWII. She had been educated in a Protestant convent for a few years, married, emigrated to Philadelphia, and, by 1970, was working as a nurse in Chadds Ford for Wyeth’s neighbor Karl Kuerner when she met the painter.

In one sense, Helga was right in telling Palin that sex had “nothing to do with” her relationship with Wyeth. The two met when each was at a crossroads, shadowed by death. Kuerner was terminally ill at the time that Helga was caring for him, while Wyeth had two years before lost Christina Olson, a friend and neighbor afflicted with polio who had been his favorite subject (including in perhaps his most famous painting, Christina’s World).

As a result of the paintings, Helga later said, according to Richard Meryman’s biography Andrew Wyeth: A Secret Life: "I became alive. It shows in the pictures. I became young overnight. I've never done anything more worthwhile." As for Wyeth, the collaboration with this muse gave him a more personal outlet than he may have felt he had in the past few years. Betsy was an extraordinarily shrewd business manager, but she also wanted her husband to continue to generate images in the style people associated him with—to turn out similar paintings “like pancakes,” in Helga’s phrase. In contrast, this intensely focused group of paintings offered at least some degree of creative freedom.
The media crush resulting from the Wyeths’ revelations of the paintings led Helga to flee Chadds Ford for awhile. In time, she returned, even becoming one of his chief caregivers before his death in 2009.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Quote of the Day (N.C. Wyeth, on Teddy Roosevelt)



“When you said, ‘Roosevelt for me!’ I jumped clear out of my chair! ….I am deeply moved by your decision and congratulate you. I’ve gotten so much inspiration from him that my admiration has grown into affection.—I am not worshipping him like a fool, but have based my belief in him upon constant reading of his speeches and writings for years back, and feel that he represents, on the whole, the kind of leader we need. A letter from him not long ago, in answer to a very brief appreciation of my own, convinced me of his value to me. I am stirred to stronger manhood every time I read it!”—N.C. Wyeth, letter of October 30, 1912 to friend and fellow artist Sidney Chase, from The Wyeths: The Letters of N. C. Wyeth, 1901-1945, edited by Betsy James Wyeth (1971)

When I was in elementary school, the illustrations of N.C. Wyeth lingered in my consciousness even more profoundly than the boys’ adventure books they accompanied: Treasure Island, Kidnapped, The Black Arrow, The Mysterious Island. Now, following a tour of his studio (as well as the one used by his even more famous son, Andrew Wyeth) and a viewing of his work exhibited at the Brandywine River Museum while I was on vacation last week, I’ve grown as fascinated with the artist as with his work. And one of the things that endears him to me is that he was a huge fan of the 26th U.S. President.

I’m not terribly surprised that N.C. Wyeth took so strongly to Theodore Roosevelt. After all, the illustrator and the President were both larger-than-life figures: men given to all kinds of fun and games with their children, ardent bibliophiles who especially loved history and adventure stories, bespectacled “dudes” from the East who went to the West for a few years in their 20s in short-lived attempts to make livings. Wyeth had not only received, as his letter indicates, a letter from T.R., but as far back as seven years before, he had attended the President’s inauguration in D.C.

Wyeth was likely to be especially excited on this day a century ago. For the first time since the attempt on his life earlier in the month in Milwaukee, T.R. would be speaking at Madison Square Garden in New York City. The words of the former President (now seeking a third term, as the Progressive Party candidate) reverberate as much now as they did then. Would that as many now were inspired by this call as the likes of N.C. Wyeth was then:

“We must not sit supine and helpless. We must not permit the brutal selfishness of arrogance and the brutal selfishness of envy each to run unchecked its evil course. If we do so, then some day smoldering hatred will suddenly kindle into a consuming flame, and either we or our children will be called upon to face a crisis as grim as any which this Republic has ever seen.”

(Photo of Theodore Roosevelt campaigning for President in 1912 from the New York Times photo archive; you half expect him to say, “If my hat’s not in the ring, it’s about to be!”)