Three months after the Rockefeller Commission released its report documenting abuses by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Three Days of the Condor was released 50 years ago this week, further heightening audiences’ fears about a secret government agency run amok.
The movie,
which starred Robert Redford, brought in $27 million in box-office
revenues on a budget of $20 million, cementing the actor’s status as the
premier leading man of the mid-1970s after it had been temporarily disrupted by
the underperforming The Great Gatsby.
The film was
an adaptation of the James Grady novel Six Days of the Condor. Though
there were numerous changes from page to screen (itemized in Allan MacInnis’s 2011 post from the “Alienated in Vancouver” blog), the most significant
might have been the time compression indicated by the title.
Peter
Yates, who worked with Redford three years before on The Hot Rock, was
originally set to direct. But he was replaced by Sydney Pollack, who had
collaborated with the star on The Way We Were and would make a total of
seven films with him.
Pollack’s “great
gift,” Redford said in a Time Magazine interview after his friend’s
death in 2008, was “to cover what could have been just sort of crass commercial
filmmaking with a whole artistic [approach] that was more abstracted and was
more hip and was more offbeat.”
In Pollack’s
filmography, the movie resembling this the most might be The Pelican Brief,
another slick thriller featuring the biggest box-office star of the time (Tom
Cruise) and the requisite love interest (Jeanne Tripplehorn).
Redford’s
character, Joe Turner, goes out to pick up lunch for his colleagues at the fictitious
American Literary Historical Society (a CIA cover), only to discover upon his
return that all his coworkers have been slaughtered. Following a planned
attempt to “come in from the cold” that nearly ends with his own assassination,
he goes on the run to save his life and ferret out the truth
Reflecting in some manner the film’s plot, the atmosphere on the set was “tense,” according to this recollection by photographer Terry O’Neill, “mainly because the film was very topical, New York City was a bleak place in 1974, the President [Nixon] had just resigned, and the former head of the CIA [Richard Helms] was supposedly on set talking to Robert Redford.”
That turned out to be
the case, as the actor was, with as little fanfare as possible, eliciting from
Helms inside tips about his former agency.
Redford’s
Turner is supposed to be bookish and slightly naïve as he pores over books
in his unsecured office.
But Redford
being Redford, he doesn’t look the slightest bit nerdy, an impression enhanced
by his stylishly casual apparel: flared denim, a gold and gray wool tie, and a
gray tweed herringbone jacket that fostered such a fashion trend that “all menswear
guys have tried to copy this jacket,” said French designer Nicolas Gabard, according
to Charles Teasdale’s retrospective on the film this month in The Financial
Times.
I guess
the filmmakers needed something to make it plausible that Faye Dunaway’s
Kathy would fall for this stranger who abducts her in his frantic attempt to
stay alive—not normal behavior for most women in similar circumstances.
But for
all that, the plot was taut and the conspiracy details not especially
far-fetched—especially so for 1970s audiences who were learning daily, through
the evening news, to distrust whatever the government was telling them.
Though Dunaway
did not experience with Redford or Pollack the animosity she had encountered
with Roman Polanski on Chinatown, her role was also hardly as complex or
extensive as in that classic neo-noir. Nor was she able to rehearse or
emotionally bond much with Redford, who was already busy with pre-production on
All the President’s Men.
That
adaptation of the Bob Woodward-Carl Bernstein bestseller about how they broke
the Watergate story was a real-life version of the “paranoid” or “conspiracy”
thriller genre that became so prominent in the Seventies.
Such
movies as The Parallax View, The Conversation, Klute, and Winter
Kills marked a sharp turn away from nail-biters from a few decades before, when—at
least on film—the U.S. government protected its citizens from foreign agents
infiltrating the U.S. (Additionally, two Godfather movies and Chinatown
evinced cynicism about Law and Order, American style.)
Now, with
revelations of Presidential deceit about Watergate and Vietnam—not to mention
the assassinations of the Kennedys and Martin Luther King Jr.—the American
government and private companies with access to high-tech equipment and secrets
were being depicted as nefarious.
Unlike
wartime and later “conspiracy” movies, Three Days of the Condor was
neither blithely optimistic nor pessimistic. Its “open” ending about Turner’s
fate was, however, deeply disquieting—in effect, leaving it up to the public to
defend against attacks on the liberty of institutions as much as on individuals, from whatever quarter.

No comments:
Post a Comment