“Last Monday (July 31st) we were nearly surrounded by ice, which closed in the ship on all sides, scarcely leaving her the sea-room in which she floated. Our situation was somewhat dangerous, especially as we were compassed round by a very thick fog. We accordingly lay to, hoping that some change would take place in the atmosphere and weather.
“About two
o’clock the mist cleared away, and we beheld, stretched out in every direction,
vast and irregular plains of ice, which seemed to have no end. Some of my
comrades groaned, and my own mind began to grow watchful with anxious thoughts,
when a strange sight suddenly attracted our attention and diverted our
solicitude from our own situation. We perceived a low carriage, fixed on a
sledge and drawn by dogs, pass on towards the north, at the distance of half a
mile; a being which had the shape of a man, but apparently of gigantic stature,
sat in the sledge and guided the dogs. We watched the rapid progress of the
traveller with our telescopes until he was lost among the distant inequalities
of the ice.” — English
novelist Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley (1797–1851), Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus (1818)
A few
weeks ago I attended a lecture on Frankenstein that highlighted the
opening section of the novel, from which this passage is taken—a set of letters
from the explorer Robert Walton to his sister. His epic ambition—to discover
the North Pole, in an age when ice and extreme cold posed mortal danger—anticipates
that of Victor Frankenstein, a nearly frozen scientist he picks up in these
barren arctic wastes.
In the
grip of “the dark tyranny of despair,” Frankenstein warns against this quest
for the glory accruing to scientific discovery: “You seek for knowledge and
wisdom, as I once did; and I ardently hope that the gratification of your
wishes may not be a serpent to sting you, as mine has been.”
The “shape
of a man, but apparently of gigantic stature” is the rejected creation who has
brought Frankenstein untold misery. The glimpse that Walton’s crew has of him
here is elusive, to be filled in by the extended account that Frankenstein is
about to offer the explorer.
Walton’s
“frame story” (or, to use a term from one of my college English classes some
years ago about Henry James’ “Turn of the Screw,” an “envelope story”) was not
included in the classic 1931 adaptation of the novel starring Boris Karloff as
the monster. Despite its many faults, the 1994 remake (from which the accompanying image was taken), starring Robert DeNiro as
the Creature and Kenneth Branagh as Victor, did include this narrative device.
It will be
interesting to see if Guillermo del Toro’s version (in limited release next
week) will do likewise. I hope so, because it reinforces a lesson relevant to
our time: that heedless pursuit of scientific knowledge might produce
unexpected and unwelcome consequences.

No comments:
Post a Comment