skip to main |
skip to sidebar
“My very human
prediction: The spectacular costs associated with AI [i.e., unemployment,
shifts in insurance and retirement income] will force a debate on the sharing
of its profits. The wealthy and powerful who own the AI companies won’t like
that. But those who wished and failed to see the social media companies
declared a public utility 10 years ago, and who drew support from the populist
left and populist right—they would like that a lot. This will become one of the
great political battles of the late 2020s and beyond.”—Former Presidential
speechwriter and Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Peggy Noonan, “AI Is Here,
and a Quiet Havoc Has Begun,” The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 9-10, 2025

“Like other new and powerful technologies, quantum
computing [which uses quantum states of subatomic particles to store
information and solve complex problems faster than on classical computers] holds
enormous promise, and it also introduces significant new risks. In addition to
large-scale data theft, economic disruption, and intelligence breaches, quantum
computers could be used for malicious purposes such as stimulating and
synthesizing chemical weapons or optimizing the flight trajectories of a swarm
of drones. As with AI, the possibility of misuse or abuse raises critical
questions about who should control the technology and how to mitigate the threats.
Policymakers will need to determine how to maximize economic and societal gains
while minimizing the dangers. Finding the best ways to achieve this balance
will require a rigorous debate within civil society and an understanding by the
public of the technology’s potential gains and harms. There are multiple
futures for a world with quantum computers. The best one would see liberal
democracies leading both the technology's development and its collective
management. A worse one would have the United States and its international partners,
through inaction or insufficient actions, cede dominance of the new technology
to China and other autocratic countries.”— Charina Chou, James
Manyika, and Hartmut Neven, “The Race to Lead the Quantum Future,” Foreign
Affairs, January/February 2025 issue
“Much has been made of the supposed deglobalisation of
the world economy as physical supply chains have been unwound and reshoring of
manufacturing has become fashionable. But in the digital realm the opposite is
true: the global economy has become ever more interconnected. Mainly US and
Chinese software and digital services have been embedded in the operations of
millions of organizations and the daily lives of billions of individuals.
Globalisation may be slowing down, but e-globalisation is still accelerating.
It is essential that, as far as possible, its dangers are minimised.”— Innovation
editor and tech columnist John Thornhill, “Blue Screens of Death Need to Minimise
Risks From E-Globalisation,” The Financial Times, July 20-21, 2024