More than a century after his death, Anton Chekhov continues to offer
beguiling vistas and unforeseen quicksand for unwary theater companies. The Cherry Orchard, the version staged by New York's Roundabout Theatre Co. which just
closed a week and a half ago at the American Airlines Theatre, is no exception. It can feel so contemporary in
depicting class divisions, the illusions by which people live their daily
lives, and their pain on feeling increasingly cut off from nature. But the
playwright’s close, unhurried attention to character can lead to a mistaken
desire to “juice” up the play, and its tragicomic balance can be easily upset.
The Roundabout production illustrated this to a
marked degree. Not knowing Russian, I can’t comment on the quality of the
translation by Stephen Karam (who provided the Roundabout with a prior triumph
with his own The Humans). But so much
of the rest of this production was uneven.
Chekhov’s final play, first staged the year of his death (1904), is a dramedy involving mortality and the
crisis of the old order, an aristocracy that we know is doomed. The stand-ins for this enervated class are Lyubov Ranevskaya, returning
to her provincial childhood home from abroad after the failure of a
relationship, and her older brother, Gaev. Both idle away their time in
nostalgia and melancholy about their better days growing up on the estate,
unable to address the massive debt that will lose them their home.
It was no fault of Diane Lane that this production did not take flight. The film
actress was alternately foolish and touching as a spendthrift aristocrat all
too bound up in memories of her home—many involving her dead son. John Glover,
as Gaev, made the most of a character that can feel maddeningly ineffectual to
audiences.
As Lopakhin, Harold Perrineau represented an example not so much of color-blind but
color-conscious casting. It was impossible to watch his parvenu developer, the
son of a serf, without thinking of this African-American actor coming to
prominence only about a half-century since the epic civil-rights legislation of
the Sixties. Perrineau made the most of his big scene, when Lopakhin, wild with
joy over how far he has come but still feeling an awkward fit among the landed
gentry he’s about to displace, gets drunk.
This drunk scene, though, also demonstrated some of the
problems in the overall conception by Simon Godwin, who, at the National Theatre, has become one of Britain’s leading
directors. The focus on Lopakhin’s awkwardness should have been enough to drive
this scene, but Godwin has blown up the action in a distracting manner, with a
large, loud party.
Meanwhile, Godwin made another choice, with the
conclusion, that veered in the opposite direction. As in the original play, the
beloved old retainer, Firs (played here by the appropriately beloved theater
legend, Joel Grey), is forgotten and
left to die alone in the abandoned house, a tragicomic symbol of his employer’s
ultimate carelessness.
But, in ending on a dying fall, this otherwise noisy Cherry Orchard missed the most significant sound effect in Chekhov’s stage directions: the sound of an ax, beginning its fatal work of destroying a forest—and an entire sociopolitical system that fails to see its own collapse.
But, in ending on a dying fall, this otherwise noisy Cherry Orchard missed the most significant sound effect in Chekhov’s stage directions: the sound of an ax, beginning its fatal work of destroying a forest—and an entire sociopolitical system that fails to see its own collapse.
No comments:
Post a Comment