Drums Along the Mohawk, which premiered 75 years ago this week
in Gloversville, N.Y., has never received the close scrutiny given two other
films by John Ford released during
this banner year for him, Stagecoach
and Young Mr. Lincoln. But, for
someone already regarded as a master of the moving image, it marked a distinct
advance: his first movie in Technicolor.
“It's no use talking to me about art, I make pictures
to pay the rent,” the Oscar-winning director disclaimed about his creative
aspirations. But, like an artist, this creator of “pictures” knew how to work
with the materials he had at hand—including, during production of Drums Along the Mohawk, a new film
process and a leading lady working way out of her comfort zone.
Ford didn’t spend much time covering a scene—actors
would enter, play it out and depart—but using composition he could insert all
kinds of subtleties, through depth, light and shadow, and careful camera
placement. He might not come up with a particular film process, but he was
always on the lookout for techniques that worked and knew how to employ them in
his own projects. So, for instance, after he saw how German filmmakers F.W.
Murnau and G.W. Pabst used shadow effectively, he borrowed from their
“Expressionist” style when making The
Informer, his thriller about the final days of a Dubliner with an uneasy
conscience.
The director was seeking something different for Drums Along the Mohawk. The film, based
on a bestselling Walter Edmonds novel, would focus not on one psychologically
isolated man but on a couple who would be at the vanguard of an entire group of
people. Like so many of Ford’s other movies, it was a western, all right, but one
occurring east of the Mississippi. It could have been a missing entry in James
Fenimore Cooper’s Leatherstocking Saga,
about how settlers in the New York interior coped with attacks by the British
and their Native-American allies during the Revolutionary War.
While not as masterful as what Ford later put
onscreen in such films as The Quiet Man
and The Searchers, the color scheme
worked out for Drums Along the Mohawk
earned Academy Award nominations for cinematographers Bert Glennon and Ray
Rennahan. But, on the set of the movie, before all this was apparent, there was
one important doubter: leading lady Claudette Colbert.
Then the highest-paid actress in Hollywood, Colbert
was a fish out of water on the movie’s remote Utah location. It did not possess
the comforts she had grown familiar with, and when she managed to secure one of
these for her own use—a bathtub—her crusty director ridiculed her in front of
the entire set.
Moreover, that set was about as testosterone-charged
as it could get in Hollywood. Over the years, members of the so-called
"Ford Stock Company" would include stunt men Terry Wilson, Chuck
Hayward, and Ben Johnson; directors of photography Winton Hoch and William
Clothier; prop man Lefty Hough; film editor Robert Parrish; art director Fran
Hotaling; assistant director Wingate Smith, who was also Ford's brother-in-law;
writers James Warner Bellah, Nunnally Johnson, John Lee Mahin, and Philip
Dunne; and actor (and Ford drinking buddy) Ward Bond.
Scan that list again. Not a woman in the bunch—rather like the army and naval crews so many of his movies would chronicle and celebrate.
Scan that list again. Not a woman in the bunch—rather like the army and naval crews so many of his movies would chronicle and celebrate.
As with most clashes, tensions between Colbert and
Ford arose because of their wildly varying personalities. The actress’ position in
Hollywood hinged, she believed, on her sassy good looks, so she insisted on
being photographed on what she saw as her left—better—side of her face.
This insistence could drive much more mild-mannered
men than Ford to distraction. (Twenty years later, relations between Colbert
and longtime friend Noel Coward had become so poisoned by this attitude that,
legend says, the dramatist confided to a friend that he would love “to wring
her little neck—if only I could find it!”) It didn’t help that Colbert was
skittish about how she would come off in Technicolor.
Ford was not one to indulge suggestions from an
actor. In the early 1950s, one unwary youngster, 22-year-old Robert Wagner,
was startled when the director struck him in the face for being so bold on the
set of What Price Glory?
By comparison, Colbert should have counted herself
lucky. Ford had fumed over Colbert’s attention to her dailies; then, he had
barely held his temper about her desire for a tub. But what put him over the
brink was the day she showed up on the set quite late.
As soon as she arrived, Ford went alone for
a walk with her. When she got back to the set, she was teary-eyed. Colbert told friends that Ford had read her the riot act over her lack of
professionalism.
Colbert survived that encounter, though she also endured an additional tendency of the demanding director’s: subjecting actors
to harsh treatment in order to induce a desired reaction (one, Ford believed,
the actor was capable of delivering).
Colbert’s character, the newlywed Lana, would find herself on the physical and emotional brink as she tried to adjust to a life on the frontier nothing like her sheltered, aristocratic upbringing in Albany. As good—great, even—as the actress was, it is very likely that her level of realism in this role owes much to her extreme distress during production.
Colbert’s character, the newlywed Lana, would find herself on the physical and emotional brink as she tried to adjust to a life on the frontier nothing like her sheltered, aristocratic upbringing in Albany. As good—great, even—as the actress was, it is very likely that her level of realism in this role owes much to her extreme distress during production.
Why would actors put up with this torment? For one thing,
of course, the chance to shine in a prestige project that, in the hands of a
consummate craftsman, might provide the greatest moments of their career.
But—particularly in the case of the men on the
site—Ford created an after-hours environment where cast and crew could bond as
they never would elsewhere. Three decades after release of Drums Along the Mohawk, male lead Henry Fonda told director-critic Peter Bogdanovich about his first
location work with the director, in an interview collected in Who the Hell's in It: Portraits and Conversations:
“It was way up—nine, ten thousand feet altitude—in a
valley that was high above the cedar breaks….It wasn’t near any kind of civilization.
We were there three weeks. Which meant that you can get rock-happy, to use an
army expression. Nothing to do at night. So Ford set things up to do….[T]he
first day he had workmen and the crew get big logs and put these logs as seats,
all the way around in a big circle in which there would be a campfire. And
every night there was a campfire. Every night there was some different kind of
entertainment. I was made camp director.”
Participants would play accordion or guitar, sing
barbershop-quartet style, play cards, or other entertainment, usually ending
with a bugler playing taps from the woods.
“I never had more fun in my life than on locations with Ford,” Fonda
summed up. But that was always at night: “During the day it was making the
picture, you weren’t horsing around.”
Drums
Along the Mohawk was the second of three extraordinary
collaborations in a single calendar involving the actor and director, bookended
by Young Mr. Lincoln (in which Ford
persuaded a reluctant Fonda to accept the title role by arguing successfully
that he wouldn’t be playing an icon, but “a jack-leg lawyer in Springfield”)
and The Grapes of Wrath (netting
Fonda his first Best Actor Oscar nomination). From 1939 to 1948, they would
work together five times, in pieces of Americana of increasing subtlety and
mastery.
Their working relationship ended tragically in 1955,
because Ford acted even more egregiously toward Fonda than he had toward
Colbert. The director’s alcohol-fueled bullying had worsened over time. While
making Mr. Roberts, Fonda’s return to
the big screen after several years on Broadway, actor and director clashed over
Ford’s tinkering with the script. In an argument between the two, Fonda had
hardly finished his first sentence when Ford punched the actor in the jaw,
knocking him to the floor.
Fonda did not strike back against Ford, who was 10
years older, but any hope that they could finish the film together was over. Shortly
afterward, Ford left the picture, supposedly for reasons of health, replaced by
Mervyn LeRoy—a capable director, but hardly in his league as a craftsman.
How might the outcome of that film have turned out
if Fonda had known beforehand that the only reason he had gotten to play this
same role he had performed on Broadway was that Ford had told Warner Brothers
that he wouldn’t even consider anyone other than the actor? Perhaps he might
have been more diplomatic.
But as it happened, he did not learn the truth until
a dozen years later. Once he did, the two men began to speak again. But the
great, if cantankerous, director was now too sick to make another movie. There would
be no other collaborations between the two.
Drums
Along the Mohawk should not be overlooked amid their
other works. Even though, as historian Anthony F.C. Wallace complained in Past Imperfect: History According to the Movies, audiences learned little
about the actual facts of the battle alluded to in the film, Oriskany, the
movie remains one of the best works of cinema on the American Revolution. At
the close of the film, after the surrender at Yorktown is announced, Fonda’s
character, Gilbert Martin, turns to his wife and says that they have much work
to do. The comment stands just as well for nation-building as farming in a
remote—but now, because of peace, friendlier—wilderness.
1 comment:
If I didn't know better I would have sworn you were on the set. I missed this Colbert film somehow, but after reading this review I know all I need to know about it.
Post a Comment