Feb. 13, 1913— Avant-garde paintings
and sculptures, from Europe as well as on native shores, first hit the United
States with maximum impact in an exhibition mounted at New York’s 69th Regiment
Armory in midtown Manhattan.
Many cultural critics believe that the Armory show
did for art what Igor Stravinsky’s The
Rites of Spring and James Joyce’s Ulysses
did for literature: inaugurate an age of modernism that might have scandalized
many, but which could not be ignored.
It is a bit hard, at the distance of a century—and at
the end of an absolute revolution in American art—to convey the impact of the
exhibition, formally called the “International Exhibition of Modern Art.” The
streets around the building, on Lexington Avenue and 25th Street, were packed with double-parked cars, and porters
used megaphones in an attempt to tame the crowds.
Inside, onlookers found an equally unusual setting: 300 artists with 1,600 works represented, all mounted in an immense space that dispensed with the normal walls of museums or galleries in favor of screens covered in fireproof burlap, with each of the resulting 18 rooms decorated with pine branches and live potted trees.
Inside, onlookers found an equally unusual setting: 300 artists with 1,600 works represented, all mounted in an immense space that dispensed with the normal walls of museums or galleries in favor of screens covered in fireproof burlap, with each of the resulting 18 rooms decorated with pine branches and live potted trees.
The European part of the show, featuring painters
and sculptors such as Henri Matisse, Pablo Picasso, Pierre Renoir, Claude Monet, Paul Cezanne, and Marcel Duchamp, attracted the
most notoriety, even though the American rooms outnumbered those of the major
European contributors (France, Britain, Ireland, and Germany) by almost three
to one. Coming in for the lion’s share of attention were the foreigners, often
labeled “Cubist” even if their work had no relationship to that art form. In
particular, Gallery 1, where many of the foreigners’ works were displayed,
became a special source of jibes by both critics and the great mass of viewers.
Not everyone was enamored by what they saw. Theodore Roosevelt walked through the
show on March 4, giving the former President an excuse for not attending the
inauguration ceremony of the man who defeated his attempt at a third term,
Woodrow Wilson. As it happened, TR—far better versed in politics, history and
literature than in art—had as little use for much in the exhibition as he did
for the Democratic candidate for the Oval Office.
Some works—including a walking
nude, as well as an explicitly lesbian depiction by Jules Pascin—so affronted his
Victorian sensibilities that he simply avoided the room. In his review of the
exhibition the following month in the publication Outlook, he helped to
popularize a phrase that has come to be used in politics perhaps even more than
in popular culture: the “lunatic fringe.”
Roosevelt’s notion of proper sexuality, not to
mention damaged vision (courtesy of a boxing match in the White House that left
him blind in his right eye), did not make him an ideal observer of the Armory Show.
But one group of artists did appeal to him. They were not only American and little
influenced by Continental artistic norms, but their social realism and use of
gritty urban settings struck a chord in this politician who had accompanied
journalist-photographer Jacob Riis in documenting (and staring unflinchingly
at) dire slum conditions. This group of artists had become known as “The Eight”
for their collective participation in another show five years before. But they
are also known to history by another nickname, one that, like the Impressionists
and the Cubists, was originally meant to be pejorative. This was the “Ashcan School.”
The informal leader of this octet (consisting of Arthur
Davies, Robert Henri, William Glackens, Ernest Lawson, George Luks, Maurice Prendergast,
John Sloan and Everett Shinn) was Robert Henri, who had taught four of them. They took to heart his advice, “Forget
about art and paint pictures of what interests you in life.” They captured the
scene as it was lived in alleys, tenements, even taverns. It was a far cry from
the society portraits of John Singer Sargent (whose portrait of T.R. was
virtually the first thing seen by Wilson after the latter entered the White House),
but they now found a public more receptive to their work.
The group was instrumental in the formation of the
new professional coalition, the Association of American Painters and Sculptors,
which organized the Armory Show. The exhibition, after causing a stir in New
York, did so again when it moved on to Chicago and Boston.
In
time, the armory show became such a locus of modernity that some people made
erroneous claims of association with it. One of these was William Carlos Williams,
who wrote in his autobiography that he had attended the event. In actuality,
biographer Herbert Leibowitz has shown, the poet, writing nearly 40 years after
the fact, had confused it with another modernist exhibition. But such had
become its totemic power that the imagination had supplied the details that the
memory couldn’t.
No comments:
Post a Comment