"As every past generation has had to disenthrall itself from an inheritance of truisms and stereotypes, so in our own time we must move on from the reassuring repetition of stale phrases to a new, difficult, but essential confrontation with reality. For the great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie—deliberate, contrived, and dishonest—but the myth—persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic. Too often we hold fast to the cliches of our forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." — President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963), Yale University Commencement Address, June 11, 1962
Though I understand the impulse perfectly, it’s too
bad that some people don’t recall more about John F. Kennedy than his
assassination 62 years ago today and the trauma it inflicted on this nation. That
goes as well for his deeply imperfect private life (which, as I noted in this prior blog post, on at least one occasion left him potentially subject to
manipulation by J. Edgar Hoover).
As constant and, yes, as reckless as Kennedy’s
philandering was, an awful lot of people today—including many whose evangelical
faith would once have scorned adulterers in high places—overlook a later occupant of the Oval Office with such a propensity as bad, if not worse. And
that later President has rarely if ever sounded the grace notes in public discourse
that Kennedy consistently did.
JFK belonged to an era when statesmen and politicians didn’t
communicate by cable TV or podcast soundbites, tweets, or memes. He addressed
audiences that paid relatively prolonged attention, with words that sought to reason
with, and, ultimately, persuade and even inspire them.
I wish more people wouldn’t blindly accept everything
they read on social media. The Internet allows you to go right to original,
primary sources—speeches, diaries, extended TV interviews, sometimes even court
transcripts, even more—to see what a politician said or wrote. And with a bit
more curiosity and digging, you can discover the context in which it was
expressed.
So it is with the speech I’m quoting from today. The
excerpt here has something to recommend (or dispute) about “a prefabricated set
of interpretations” or even whether such preconceptions are more dangerous
these days than lies.
But reading the context of the quote—the speech in
full—reveals that JFK was making larger points, about the size and distribution
of government, public fiscal policy, and public confidence in business and
America. The conditions that held sway when he discussed all of this might have
changed, but the issues endure. In fact, they go back to the creation of the
Constitution.
All of this is in keeping with the fact that JFK was
not afraid of public debate. Faced with challenges to his policies, he could
deflect rather than denigrate. Asked at a press conference about a Republican
National Committee resolution calling his administration a failure, for
instance, he chuckled, “I assume it passed unanimously.”
Notice that he didn’t say, “You’re a terrible person
and a terrible reporter,” as the current Oval Office occupant (hilariously
hailed as a great communicator by many in the media) told an ABC reporter in the last week. Nor
would JFK have chided a female Bloomberg News journalist, with two words that deserve their own corner in
infamy, “Quiet, Piggy.”
These exchanges sum up how much we lost in this
country since that terrible day in Dallas six decades ago: respect for
differences of opinion and basic Presidential dignity. On my worst days, I fear
that we may never recover them.

No comments:
Post a Comment