Jan. 5, 1781—Facing only token opposition, Royal troops in Virginia under their notorious new commander, Benedict Arnold, plundered and destroyed at will public buildings and private residences in Richmond, the recently designated capital of the commonwealth.
The attack was so unexpected that few troops were
available to stand in the way of the traitor who, for all his double-dealing,
continued to display the energy and skill that had once made him so valuable to
the Continental Army.
Having no clue until too late as to Arnold’s ultimate
destination, Governor Thomas Jefferson (pictured) tried in vain to instigate
a military counter-offensive and maintain civil authority in the small
community he had done so much to bring into being as the new seat of government
in Virginia, leading to charges of incompetence and even cowardice that dogged
him for the rest of his life.
Arnold's raid—as well as the larger five-month campaign he conducted in the interior—also had consequences for Jefferson’s personal
life. To avoid capture by the English, he sent his wife Martha and young
children packing for Tuckahoe, the plantation where he had spent much of his
childhood. That journey through the wilderness in the deepest heart of the winter
led to his five-week-old daughter Lucy catching a cold that worsened until she
died in mid-April.
Forty years ago, in a college seminar on the American
Presidency, our professor was fond of pointing out that for many Presidents,
their prior experiences as governor foreshadowed how they would act in the
White House. How, then, should we view Jefferson’s performance as an executive?
Unlike fellow Virginian George Washington, the “Sage
of Monticello” had no experience of physical combat. Unlikely as it might seem,
he had even less appetite for political combat. He left after two terms as both
governor and President exhausted from the struggle, with the braying of his
enemies ringing in his ears.
It is true that the powers of the Virginia governor
were weak, requiring consensus by an eight-man Council of State. It is also
true that any occupant of the office would be handicapped by the inability to
raise funds at that time.
On the positive side, Jefferson had enough popularity
to win a second term, and enough foresight to have drawn up, four years before,
enabling legislation to move the commonwealth’s capital away from Williamsburg—easily
accessible to invading troops attacking with a navy—to a more defensible
interior location in Richmond. Moreover, he took care to move arms and necessary
papers to safety.
But Jefferson lacked the personal charisma of predecessor
Patrick Henry, Washington’s hard-won recognition of the many ways that things
could go wrong in a military campaign—or the willingness to exercise the authority
of his office up to its constitutional limits. Thus, he did not receive word
until late that Arnold was pressing inland from the coast; did not notify
Washington in time that Continental troops were needed to repel the invaders; did
not guess correctly that Arnold would press towards Richmond rather than Petersburg;
and did not call out the militia in time to defend the capital.
(In the case of the militia, Jefferson—suspicious of
the threat posed by a standing army to republican government—remained, even
three decades later, deeply naïve about the ability of poorly trained soldiers,
signed up for limited service, to carry out significant military duties. His belief
that Canada could be captured as a result of “a mere matter of marching” turned
out to be spectacularly wrong, and the burning of Washington under his
successor, James Madison, echoed his own experiences with Richmond.)
Unable to capture Jefferson himself, the redcoats took
some of his slaves from the governor’s residence in Richmond. They then proceeded
to Portsmouth, establishing there a base from which they could continue to
launch raids in the countryside.
With Jefferson’s second term drawing to a close in early
summer and no successor in sight, the English reached the Monticello, the
mountain estate that he thought would be safe from English deprivation. Again
he was wrong, forcing him to gallop away so hurriedly that some mistook it for
cowardice.
Following an embarrassing inquiry into his conduct of
the defense of Richmond, the legislature adopted a resolution praising his “ability,
rectitude and integrity.” But critics began to complain about his lack of decisiveness
in directing the campaign—notably Major General Baron von Steuben, who had won
Washington’s gratitude and trust for intensively training Continental troops.
Steuben was indignant that Jefferson had not used his office to order
militiamen or even slaves to construct a fort at Hood’s Point.
Just a few weeks before his death in 1826, Jefferson
had been willing to sit down with a son of onetime critic Henry Lee to provide
documents justifying his role in the Richmond campaign. But the former President
was too exhausted by what proved to be his death struggle to respond at the necessary
length.
No comments:
Post a Comment