"Hain't we got all the fools in town on our side? And ain't that a big enough majority in any town?"—American novelist and humorist Mark Twain (1835-1910), Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (1885)
Like few other American
writers, Mark Twain understood how susceptible Americans are to greed and
cruelty. In his “Duke and the Dauphin” chapters from Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, he satirized the con men who went the length
and breadth of the American heartland, along the mighty Mississippi, looking
for easy marks.
The “Dauphin” (i.e., the Bourbon
claimant—false, in this case—to the French throne) who states the above has been
amply justified to believe that their latest con will work. What he doesn’t
reckon with is the countervailing American propensity towards
violence—evidenced in Huck’s abuse at the hands of his drunken father, the
long-running Grangerford-Shepherdson feud, and the system of slavery that
endangers Huck’s friend Jim.
No matter people’s capacity for self-delusion,
they are frightening to behold when fleeced of their money. When one set of
townspeople realize this, they administer summary judgement, sending the two
grifters, “astraddle of a rail,” tarred and feathered.
In 21st-century America as much as
the antebellum era that Twain wrote about, con artists, whether phone scammers,
businessmen, politicians, or businessmen-turned-politicians, continue to prey, only
more broadly and with greater sophistication. That does not mean that
vengeance, when it comes, will not be as terrible as it was in Twain’s time.
(The image of the Duke and Dauphin accompanying
this post is one of Norman Rockwell’s illustrations for the Heritage Club’s
edition of Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.)
No comments:
Post a Comment