“You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set
you free, but you will never get to know the truth by reading the Alexandria Town Talk. You all read in that paper
that I am crazy. Ohyeah. Do I look any crazier than I ever did? I been accused
of saying the fella that owns that paper is a kept man. Maybe he ain't, but I'd
like to be kep' as good as he is. He married a rich woman. That's about the
best way I know to save yourself about ninety-eight years' hard
work.”—Louisiana Governor Earl Long (1895-1960), quoted in A.J. Liebling, The Earl of Louisiana (1961)
For the current state of elections, I blame mostly the
ad men and political consultants for Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. These
professionals didn’t have much to work with—a corrupt paranoid with an avid
interest in policy, and a likable former matinee idol with no interest in policy—and sold them to the American people like
bars of soap. Their advice, followed eagerly by their clients, was simple: Stick to the script. Stay on message.
Hearing this, Earl Long (1895-1960), as I think you can tell from the above quote, would have snorted in astonishment. Script? What
script? Message—isn’t
that something from Western Union?
Several years ago, in Politics Lost: How American Democracy Was Trivialized By People Who
Think You're Stupid, Time Magazine
writer Joe Klein recalled Bobby Kennedy’s extraordinary impromptu address, amid
the frenetic 1968 primary season, on the night of Martin Luther King Jr.’s
assassination, to a group of anguished
and angry African-American voters in Indiana. Kennedy spoke of his own
brother’s murder, then mentioned his “favorite poet,” Aeschylus, quoting powerful
lines about how “pain which cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, until
... in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom through the awful grace
of God.'"
It was an electrifying moment in American political theater, a pause amid searing
tragedy—created at least partly because a candidate was blissfully ignorant of
his listeners’ psychographics: “The audience hasn't been sliced and diced by
his pollsters, their prejudices and policy priorities cross-tabbed, their
favorite words discovered by carefully targeted focus groups,” writes Klein.
“Uncle Earl” Long embodied a long-past moment of
political theater, too, but in a comic vein: Aristophanes to Kennedy’s
Aeschylus. What he shared with the fated Presidential candidate was an
improvised performance. It was spoken, and then
some.
“It is difficult to report a speech by Uncle Earl
chronologically, listing the thoughts in order of appearance,” wrote The New Yorker’s A.J. Liebling. “They
chased one another on and off the stage like characters in a Shakespearean
battle scene, full of alarums and sorties.”
Liebling’s politics were distinctly liberal, and
certainly Long’s comparatively moderate civil-rights policies (no attempt to
break Jim Crow laws, but an expansion of employment and suffrage opportunities
for African-Americans) appealed to him. But even if that were not the case, one
suspects that his overriding affection for those on the raffish side of life
would have led him to hold a grudging affection for this politician.
This was, after all, not only the brother of “The
Kingfish,” Huey Long, but a man whose outrageous fling with stripper Blaze
Starr inspired the 1989 movie Blaze.
(Incidentally, if you really want an idea of what
Earl Long’s life and last campaign were like, you’ll stick with Liebling rather
than this movie. Liebling’s profile makes you feel what it was like in that
last campaign—one so hot that at one memorable moment, Long holds a bottle of
Coca-Cola up to his head to cool off. Director Ron Shelton seems far less
interested in telling Long’s story than Blaze’s, and he was certainly besotted
in the making of the film with female star Lolita Davidovich, whom he
eventually married.)
The chapter from which the “Quote of the Day” was
taken appeared in a book edited by Mordecai Richler, The Best of Modern Humor. It’s easy to see why Liebling’s account
made it into this 1983 anthology. To be sure, Liebling wrote some clever asides
about the politician.
But most of the chapter rolls along on the rhythms of
Long’s voice, a style virtually nonexistent among today’s blow-dried,
soundbite-hounded, risk-averse politicos. It’s at once colorful, earthy, raw,
and even in your face, as when Long confronts a Democratic heckler and gives it
to him with both barrels: “I knew your daddy, Camille Gravel, and he was a fine
man. But you trying to make yourself a big man, and you nothing but a little
puissant."
In my home Congressional district, we just went
through a primary in which the two candidates bombarded each other for weeks
with screaming mail order ads, high-decibel, sneering TV commercials, and nonstop
robocalls—all the way to 15 minutes before the polls closed, and all to
highlight virtually nonexistent differences between two veteran Democratic
liberal congressmen. By the time it was over, I was thoroughly disgusted by the
shameful spectacle.
I’m not saying I would have wanted to live in Long’s
time, mind you, but the political combat would have been less disembodied, more
hand to hand—and infinitely more entertaining.
Oh, one more thing about Long: After an incoherent speech against a bitter enemy, an unremitting racist, in the state legislature, Earl Long's wife, perhaps out of retaliation for his affair with Blaze Starr, committed her husband to a mental institution. In turn, he managed to check himself out and run in his last political campaign.
After all this time, it's hard to know the psychological disorder to which Earl Long was indebted. Whatever it was, however, he was still more sane than virtually the entire slate of GOP Presidential candidates this past year.
(Photo of Earl
Long, undated, in his office at the state capitol.)
Regarding the statement in the last paragraph of this piece, "it's hard to know the psychological disorder to which Earl Long was indebted." In actuality, Uncle Earl had no psychological disorder at all. It's a little-known fact, but Earl was taking large amounts of Dexedrine and mixing it with whiskey during those days when he was labeled as "crazy". That combination would, of course, certainly make him seem crazy, but after he stopped with the self-medication, he returned to his rather sane self again. I have this information verified by a recording of an interview my father conducted with Long's psychiatrist in the 1970s. It was also known within the Long family, some of whose descendants I have interviewed myself but can't reveal the sources because they are still living. As for the movie Blaze, what a load of nonsense! He could not have had sex with Blaze Starr because he couldn't get it up after prostate surgery for cancer that was a well-kept secret at the time. Plus, I'm pretty sure Dexedrine has a similar effect. As author Jack B. McGuire says in his book, Uncle Earl Deserved Better, "Earl could have played Paul Newman much better than Paul Newman played Earl." And yes, he would STILL make a much better candidate strung out on drugs and alcohol than any of the 2016 Republican Party clowns and illusionists.
ReplyDelete